Advertisement

Solitude for the Multitudes

Managing Recreational Use in the Wilderness
  • George H. Stankey
Part of the Human Behavior and Environment book series (HUBE, volume 10)

Abstract

Wilderness evokes many impressions—pristine nature, spectacular scenery, wildlife in its natural habitat. And solitude. A solitary backpacker silhouetted along a mountain ridgeline exemplifies the image of wilderness as a setting of solitude, where one is alone in the midst of primitive natural conditions. The imagery is backed by law: the 1964 Wilderness Act, the legal foundation for the protection and management of wilderness, states that such areas will have “outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation.” Indeed, Lucas (1985) reports that 85% of the wilderness vis itors he surveyed rated “to experience solitude” as an important wilderness appeal.

Keywords

Outdoor Recreation Voluntary Attention Salient Motive Range Experiment Station Wilderness Quality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Absher, J. D., & Lee, R. G. (1981). Density as an incomplete cause of crowding in backcountry settings. Leisure Sciences 4 ,231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, P. J., McCool, S. F., & Manfredo, M. J. (1987). Evolving concepts and tools for rec reation user management in wilderness: A state-of-knowledge review. In R. C. Lucas (Ed.), Proceedings-National wilderness research conference: Issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions (USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. No. INT-220, pp. 320–346). Odgen, UT: Intermountain Research Station.Google Scholar
  4. Burch, W. R., Jr. (1981). The ecology of metaphor-spacing regularities for humans and other primates in urban and wildland habitats. Leisure Sciences, 4 ,213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burch, W. R., Jr. (1984). Much ado about nothing-some reflections on the wider and wilder implications of social carrying capacity. Leisure Sciences ,6, 487–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, R. N., Hendee, J. C., & Campbell, F. L. (1971). Values, behavior, and conflict in modern camping culture. Journal of Leisure Research ,3, 143–159.Google Scholar
  7. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Gramann, J. H. (1982). Toward a behavioral theory of crowding in outdoor recreation: An evaluation and synthesis of research. Leisure Sciences ,5, 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammitt, W. E. (1982). Cognitive dimensions of wilderness solitude. Environment and Behavior, 14 ,478–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammitt, W. E. (1983). Toward an ecological approach to perceived crowding in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences, 5 ,309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hendee, J. C., Clark, R. N., & Daily, T. E. (1977). Fishing and other recreation behavior at highmountain lakes in Washington State. (USDA Forest Service Research Note PNW-304). Portland, OR: Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  12. Hendee, J. C., Stankey, G. H., & Lucas, R. C. (1978). Wilderness management. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  13. Krumpe, E. E., & Brown, P. J. (1982). Redistributing backcountry use through information related to recreation experiences. Journal of Forestry, 80 ,360–362.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, R. G. (1977). Alone with others: The paradox of privacy in wilderness. Leisure Sciences, 1 ,3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lucas, R. C. (1964). Wilderness perception and use: The example of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. Natural Resources Journal ,3, 394–411.Google Scholar
  16. Lucas, R. C. (1973). Wilderness: A management framework. Journal of Soil and Water Conser vation, 28 ,150–154.Google Scholar
  17. Lucas, R. C. (1985). Visitor characteristics, attitudes, and use patterns in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex, 1970-82 (USDA Forest Service Research Paper No. INT-345). Ogden, UT: Intermountain Research Station.Google Scholar
  18. Manning, R. E. (1985). Crowding norms in backcountry settings: A review and synthesis. Journal of Leisure Research, 17 ,75–89.Google Scholar
  19. McCool, S. F. (1983). Wilderness quality and wilderness solitude: Are they related? In S. McCool (Ed.), The Bob Marshall Wilderness visitor study (pp. 40–61). Missoula, MT: University of Montana.Google Scholar
  20. Nash, R. (1982). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Nielsen, J. M., & Endo, R. (1977). Where have all the purists gone? An empirical examination of the displacement process hypothesis in wilderness recreation. Western Sociological Re view, 8 ,61–75.Google Scholar
  22. Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (1970). Freedom of choice and behavior in a physical setting. In H. M. Proshanksy, W. H. Ittelson, & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Envi ronmental psychology: Man and his physical setting (pp. 173–182). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  23. Roggenbuck, J. W., Watson, A. E., & Stankey, G. H. (1982). Wilderness management in the southern Appalachians. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 6 ,147–152.Google Scholar
  24. Schreyer, R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1978). The influence of experience expectations on crowding perceptions and social-psychological carrying capacities. Leisure Sciences, 1 ,373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shelby, B. (1980). Crowding models for backcountry recreation. Land Economics, 56 ,43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shelby, B. (1981). Encounter norms in backcountry settings: Studies of three rivers. Journal of Leisure Research, 6 ,433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreational settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Shelby, B., Heberlein, T. A., Vaske, J. J., & Alfano, G. (1983). Expectations, preferences, and feeling crowded in recreation activities. Leisure Sciences, 6 ,1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stankey, G. H. (1973). Visitor perception of wilderness recreation carrying capacity (USDA Forest Service Research Paper No. INT-142). Ogden, UT: Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  30. Stankey, G. H. (1980). A comparison of carrying capacity perceptions among visitors to two wilder nesses (USDA Forest Service Research Paper No. INT-242). Ogden, UT: Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  31. Stankey, G. H., & Lucas, R. C. (1986). Shifting trends in backcountry and wilderness use. Paper presented to the First National Symposium on Social Science and Resource Management, Corvallis, OR, June.Google Scholar
  32. Stankey, G. H., & McCool, S. F. (1984). Carrying capacity in recreational settings: Evolution, appraisal, and application. Leisure Sciences, 6 ,453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stankey, G. H., & Schreyer, R. (1987). Attitudes toward wilderness and factors affecting visitor behavior: A state-of-knowledge review. In R. C. Lucas (Ed.), Proceedings-National wil derness research conference: Issues, state-of-knowledge, future directions (USDA Forest Service General Tech. Rep. No. INT-220, pp. 246–293). Ogden, UT: Intermountain Research Station.Google Scholar
  34. Stokols, D. (1972). On the distinction between density and crowding: Some implications for future research. Psychological Review, 79 ,275–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stokols, D., Rall, M., Pinner, B., & Schopler, J. (1973). Physical, social, and personal determinants on the perception of crowding. Environment and Behavior ,5, 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Twight, B. W., Smith, K. L., & Wissinger, G. H. (1981). Privacy and camping: Closeness to the self vs. closeness to others. Leisure Sciences, 4 ,427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vaske, J. J., Graefe, A. R., & Dempster, A. (1982). Social and environmental influences on perceived crowding. In Proceedings of the Wilderness Psychology Group Conference (pp. 211– 227). Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University.Google Scholar
  38. Wagar, J. A. (1964). The carrying capacity of wildlands for recreation (Forest Science Monograph No. 7). Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters.Google Scholar
  39. West, P. C. (1981). Perceived crowding and attitudes toward limiting use in backcountry recreation areas. Leisure Sciences ,4, 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  41. Womble, P., &Studebaker, S. (1981). Crowding in a national park campground. Environment and Behavior, 13 ,557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • George H. Stankey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Leisure StudiesKuring-gai College of Advanced EducationLindfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations