Advertisement

Endometrial Hyperplasia and Neoplasia

  • Alex Ferenczy
  • Christine Bergeron

Abstract

The pathogenesis of endometrial hyperplasia and its relationship to carcinoma have long been issues of concern to students of endometrial pathology (Hertig and Sommers, 1949; Hertig et al., 1949; Beutler et al., 1963; Gusberg and Kaplan, 1963; Vellios, 1972; Gusberg et al., 1974; Welch and Scully, 1977; Tavassoli and Kraus, 1978; Fox and Buckley, 1982; Ferenczy et al., 1983; Kurman et al., 1985; Ferenczy, 1988). More specifically, the morphological diagnosis, the potential for invasive carcinoma, and the appropriate treatment of hyperplastic endometria remain hotly debated and controversial subjects. Difficulties in obtaining consensus have resulted from several complex factors, both morphological and clinical. For example, histologically benign endometrial glands may present with worrisome architecture, mimicking malignancy, whereas glandular cells with a benign appearance or very subtle cytological modifications may demonstrate extensive invasive growth patterns of well-differentiated carcinoma.

Keywords

Endometrial Cancer Invasive Carcinoma Endometrial Carcinoma Endometrial Hyperplasia Endometrial Adenocarcinoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aausems, E. W. M. A., Van der Kamp, J. K., and Baak, J. P. A., 1985, Nuclear morphometry in the determination of the prognosis of marked atypical endometrial hyperplasia, Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 4: 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkin, N. B., 1976, Cytogenetic Aspects of Malignant Transformation, S. Karger, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Baak, J. P. A., and Oort, J., 1983, A Manual of Morphometry in Diagnostic Pathology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Baak, J. P. A., Kurver, P. H. J., Diegenbach, P. C., Delemarre, J. F. M., Brekelmans, E. C. M., and Nieuwlaat, J. E., 1981, Discrimination of hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium by quantitative microscopy-a feasibility study, Histopathology 5: 61–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, F. F., 1981, Recent concepts of initiation and promotion in carcinogenesis, Am. J. Pathol. 105: 3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeron, C., Ferenczy, A., and Shyamala, G., 1988a, Distribution of estrogen receptors in various cell types of normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic human endometrial tissues, Lab. Invest. 58: 338–344.Google Scholar
  7. Bergeron, C., Ferenczy, A., Toft, D. O., and Shyamala, G., 1988b, Immunocytochemical study of pro-gesterone receptors in hyperplastic and neoplastic endometrial tissues, Cancer. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Beutler, H. K., Dockerty, M. B., and Randall, L. M., 1963, Precancerous lesions of the endometrium, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 86: 433–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bokhman, J. V., 1981, Two pathogenic types of endometrial carcinoma, Gynecol. Oncol. 15: 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boronow, R. C., Morrow, C. P., and Creasman, W. T., 1984, Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: Clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study, Obstet. Gynecol. 63: 825–832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Budwit-Novotny, D. A., McCarty, K. S., Cox, E. B., Soper, J. T., Mutch, D. G., Creasman, W. T., Flowers, J. T., and McCarty, J. S., Jr., 1986, Immunohistochemical analyses of estrogen receptor in endometrial adenocarcinoma using a monoclonal antibody, Cancer Res. 46: 5419–5425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chamlian, D. L., and Taylor, H. B., 1970, Endometrial hyperplasia in young women, Obstet. Gynecol. 36: 659–665.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, J. H., Schrader, W. T., and O’Malley, B. W., 1985, Mechanisms of steroid hormone action, in: Textbook of Endocrinology ( J. D. Wilson, and D. W. Foster, eds.), W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  14. Colgan, T. J., Norris, H. J., Foster, W., Kurman, R. J., and Fox, C. H., 1983, Predicting the outcome of endometrial hyperplasia by quantitative analysis of nuclear features using a linear discriminant function, Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1: 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Couturier, J., Vielh, P., Salmon, R., and Dutrillaux, B., 1986, Trisomy and tetrasomy for long arm of chromosome 1 in near diploid human endometrial adenocarcinomas, Int. J. Cancer 38: 17–19.Google Scholar
  16. Cunha, G. R., Chung, L. W. K., Shannon, J. M., Taguchi, O., and Fujii, H., 1983, Hormone-induced morphogenesis and growth: Role of mesenchymal-epithelial interactions, Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 39: 559–598.Google Scholar
  17. Dallenbach, F. D., and Rudolph, H. E., 1974, Foam cells and estrogen activity of the human endometrium, Arch. Gyndkol. 217: 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deligdisch, L., and Cohen, C. J., 1985, Histologic correlates and virulence implications of endometrial carcinoma associated with adenomatous hyperplasia, Cancer 56: 1452–1455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dupont, W. D., and Page, D. L., 1985, Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease, N. Engl. J. Med. 312: 146–151.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eichner, E., and Abellera, M., 1971, Endometrial hyperplasia treated by progestagens, Obstet. Gynecol. 38: 739–741.Google Scholar
  21. Fechner, R. E., and Kaufman, R., 1974, Endometrial adenocarcinoma in Stein-Leventhal syndrome, Cancer 34: 444–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feichter, G. E., Hoffken, H., Heep, J., Haag, D., Heberling, D., Brandt, H., Rummel, H., and Goerttler, K., 352 1982, DNA-flow-cytometric measurements on the normal, atrophic, hyperplastic, and neoplastic human endometrium, Virchows Arch. [Pathol. Anat.] 398: 53–65.Google Scholar
  23. Fenoglio, C. M., Crum, C. P., and Ferenczy, A., 1982, Endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Are ultrastructural, biochemical and immunocytochemical studies useful in distinguishing between them? Pathol. Res. Pract. 174: 257–284.Google Scholar
  24. Ferenczy, A., 1983, Cytodynamics of endometrial hyperplasia and neoplasia, part II: In vitro DNA histo-autoradiography, Hum. Pathol. 14: 77–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferenczy, A., 1987, Anatomy and histology of the uterine corpus, in: Blaustein’s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract, ( R. J. Kurman, ed.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 141–157.Google Scholar
  26. Ferenczy, A., 1988, Endometrial hyperplasia and neoplasia: A two disease concept, in: Contemporary Issues in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol 3: Gynecology Oncology ( R. L. Berkowitz, C. Cohen, and N. G. Kale, eds.), Churchill Livingston, New York, pp. 197–213.Google Scholar
  27. Ferenczy, A., and Gelfand, M. M., 1984, Outpatient endometrial sampling with endocyte: Comparative study of its effectiveness with endometrial biopsy, Obstet. Gynecol. 63: 295–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferenczy, A., and Gelfand, M. M., 1986, Hyperplasia vs. neoplasia: Two tracks for the endometrium? Contemp. Ob/Gyn. 28: 79–96.Google Scholar
  29. Ferenczy, A., and Gelfand, M. M., 1988, The biologic significance of cytologic atypia in progestagen treated endometrial hyperplasia, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, (in press).Google Scholar
  30. Ferenczy, A., and Richart, R. M., 1974, Female Reproductive System: Dynamics of Scan and Transmission Electron Microscopy, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Ferenczy, A., Bertrand, G., and Gelfand, M. M., 1979, Proliferation kinetics of human endometrium during the normal menstrual cycle, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 133: 859–867.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ferenczy, A., Gelfand, M. M., and Tzipris, F., 1983, The cytodynamics of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. A review, Ann. Pathol. 3: 189–202.Google Scholar
  33. Fox, H., and Buckley, C. H., 1982, The endometrial hyperplasias and their relationship to endometrial neoplasia, Histopathology 6: 493–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freidlander, M. L., Taylor, I. W., Russell, P., Musgrove, E. A., Hedley, D. W., and Tattersall, M. H. N., 1983, Ploidy as a prognostic factor in ovarian cancer, Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fu, Y. S., Ferenczy, A., Huang, I., and Gelfand, M. M., 1988, Digital imaging analysis of normal, hyper-plastic and malignant endometrial cells, Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 10: 139–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gal, D., 1986, Hormonal therapy for lesions of the endometrium, Semin. Oncol. 13: 33–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Geisinger, K. R., Homesley, H. D., Morgan, T. M., Kute, T. E., and Marshall, R. B., 1986, Endometrial adenocarcinoma. A multiparameter clinicopathologic analysis including the DNA profile and the sex steroid hormone receptors, Cancer 58: 1518–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gibas, Z., and Rubin, S. C., 1987, Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of endometrium with simple karyotypic changes: A case report, Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 25: 21–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gleason, D. F., 1985, Atypical hyperplasia, benign hyperplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate, Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 9: 53–69.Google Scholar
  40. Gusberg, S. B., and Kaplan, A. L., 1963, Precursors of corpus cancer IV: Adenomatous hyperplasia or stage 0 carcinoma of the endometrium, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 87: 662–678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gusberg, S. B., Chen, S. J., and Cohen, C. J., 1974, Endometrial cancer: Factors influencing the choice of treatment, Gynecol. Oncol. 2: 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hertig, A. T., and Sommers, S. C., 1949, Genesis of endometrial carcinoma. I. Study of prior biopsies, Cancer 2: 946–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hertig, A. T., Sommers, S. C., and Bengloff, H., 1949, Genesis of endometrial carcinoma. III. Carcinoma in situ, Cancer 2: 964–971.Google Scholar
  44. Horwitz, R. I., and Feinstein, A. R., 1986, Estrogens and endometrial cancer. Responses to arguments and current status of an epidemiologic controversy, Am. J. Med. 81: 503–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hunter, T., 1985, Oncogenes and growth control, Trends Biochem. Sci. 10: 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Iversen, O. E., 1986, Flow cytometric deoxyribonucleic acid index: A prognostic factor in endometrial car-cinoma, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 155: 770–776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Jakobsen, A., 1984, Prognostic impact of ploidy level in carcinoma of the cervix, Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 7: 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Janne, O., Kauppila, A., Kontula, K., Syrjala, P., and Vihko, R., 1979, Female sex steroid receptors in normal, hyperplastic and carcinomatous endometrium. The relationship to serum steroid hormones and gonadotropins and changes during medroxyprogesterone acetate administration, Int. J. Cancer 24: 545–554.Google Scholar
  49. Katayama, K. P., and Jones, H. W., 1967, Chromosomes of atypical (adenomatous) hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 97: 978–983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. King, W. J., and Greene, G. L., 1984, Monoclonal antibodies localize oestrogen receptor in the nuclei of target cells, Nature 307: 745–747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Koss, L. G., Schreiber, K., Oberlander, S. G., Moukhtar, M., Levine, H. S., and Moussouris, H. F., 1981, Screening of asymptomatic women for endometrial cancer, Obstet. Gynecol. 57: 681–691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kratochwil, K., 1986, The stroma and the control of cell growth, J. Pathol. 149: 23–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kurman, R. J., and Norris, H. J., 1982, Evaluation of criteria for distinguishing atypical endometrial hyperplasia from well-differentiated carcinoma, Cancer 49: 2547–2559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kurman, R. J., Kaminski, P. T., and Norris, H. J., 1985, The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients, Cancer 56: 403–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leavitt, W. W., Chen, T. J., and Allen, T. C., 1977, Regulation of progesterone receptor formation by estrogen action, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 286: 210–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lucas, W. E., 1981, Estrogen-a cause of gynecologic cancer? Cancer 48: 451–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McBride, J. M., 1959, Pre-menopausal cystic hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma, J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp. 66: 288–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meissner, W. A., Sommers, S. C., and Sherman, G., 1957, Endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial carcinoma, and endometriosis produced experimentally by estrogen, Cancer 10: 500–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ober, W. B., 1971, Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: A pathologist’s view, in: Symposium on Endometrial Cancer ( M. G. Brush, R. W. Taylor, and D. C. Williams, eds.), William Heinemann, London, pp. 73–81.Google Scholar
  60. Oud, P. S., Reubsaet-Veldhuizen, J. A. M., Henderik, J. B. J., Pahlplatz, M. M. M., Hermkens, H. G., Tas, J., James, J., and Vooijs, G. P., 1986, DNA and nuclear protein measurement in isolated nuclei of human endometrium, Cytometry 7: 318–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roberts, D. K., Lavia, L. A., Freedman, R. S., Horbelt, D. V., and Busby-Walker, N., 1986, Nuclear and nucleolar areas: A quantitative assessment of endometrial neoplasia, Obstet. Gynecol. 68: 705–708.Google Scholar
  62. Sachs, H., Wamtach, E. V., and Wurthner, K., 1974, DNA content of normal, hyperplastic and malignant endometrium, determined cytophotometrically, Arch. Gynecol. 217: 349–365.Google Scholar
  63. Satyaswaroop, P. G., and Mortel, R., 1981, Endometrial carcinoma: An aberration of endometrial cell differentiation, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 140: 620–623.Google Scholar
  64. Shyamala, G., and Ferenczy, A., 1981, The effect of sodium molybdate on the cytoplasmic estrogen and progesterone receptors in human endometrial tissues, Diag. Obstet. Gynecol. 3: 277–282.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, D. C., Prentice, R., Thompson, D. J., and Herrmann, W. L., 1975, Association of exogenous estrogen and endometrial carcinoma, N. Engl. J. Med. 293: 1164–1167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stephenson, R. A., James, B. C., Gay, H., Fair, W. R., Whitmore, W. F., Jr., and Melamed, M. R., 1987, Flow cytometry of prostate cancer: Relationship of DNA content to survival, Cancer Res. 47: 2504–2509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sullivan, W. P., Beito, R. G., Proper, J., Krco, C. J., and Toft, D. O., 1986, Preparation of monoclonal antibodies to the avian progesterone receptor, Endocrinology 119: 1549–1557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tavassoli, F., and Kraus, F. T., 1978, Endometrial lesions in uteri resected for atypical endometrial hyperplasia, Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 70: 770–779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Trent, J. M., 1985, Cytogenetic and molecular biologic alterations in human breast cancer: A review, Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 5: 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Trent, J. M., and Davis, J. R., 1979, D-group chromosome abnormalities in endometrial cancer and hyperplasia, Lancet 2: 361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vellios, F., 1972, Endometrial hyperplasias, precursors of endometrial carcinoma, in: Pathology Annual ( S. C. Sommers, ed.), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 201–229.Google Scholar
  72. Wagner, D., Richart, R. M., and Turner, J. Y., 1967, Deoxribonucleic acid content of presumed precursors of endometrial carcinoma, Cancer 20: 2067–2077.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Welch, W. R., and Scully, R. E., 1977, Precancerous lesions of the endometrium, Hum. Pathol. 8: 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wentz, W. B., 1966, Treatment of persistent endometrial hyperplasia with progestagen, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 96: 999–1004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Winkler, B., Alvarez, S., Richart, R. M., and Crum, C. P., 1984, Pitfalls in the diagnosis of endometrial neoplasia, Obstet. Gynecol 64: 185–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Ferenczy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christine Bergeron
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PathologyMcGill University and The Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General HospitalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMcGill University and The Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General HospitalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations