Diencephalic Surgery for the Relief of Pain

  • Donlin M. Long
Part of the Contemporary Perspectives in Neurosurgery book series (COPENEU)


Diencephalic surgery for the purpose of relieving pain has a long history and has not been an unqualified success over this time.1,2 There are several reasons for this. Stereotactic surgery, before CT and MRI, depended upon anatomical localization first by intraventricular air study and later by positive contrast. Large ventricles could be confounding, particularly if the third ventricle was wide. The anatomy defined by this technique, while satisfactory in a practical sense, was often obscured by many things (lack of ventricular filling, poor definition of commissures, thalamic assymetry). As a result, much of the localization and many of the results reported are difficult to interpret now because it is very hard to know exactly where electrodes were and where the lesions were. Lesions tended to be large; they were frequently placed somewhat arbitrarily without very good anatomical delineation. Furthermore, the pain pathway was not well understood, so thalamic lesion making did not have much chance of success. Most of the literature on diencephalic surgery and pain dating from the 1950s and 1960s is, therefore, very difficult to interpret. The lesions were made in a wide variety of places, the most common targets being the centrum medianum, the para-fascicular nucleus surrounding it, and specific thalamic sensory nuclei. The relevant papers are difficult to review. Most do not prove the localization of the lesion because the patients survived and histological specimens were not available. The size of the lesion is hard to determine given the rather crude lesion-making techniques of the time, and the criteria for the success of pain relief were indefinite at best. In fact, records show that the average follow-up duration for stereotactic pain surgery at that time was 3 months, so it was impossible to determine whether there was any long-term effect upon pain. Only a small amount of destructive thalamic surgery has persisted into this era. What we now know about the pain pathway might make a rebirth more fruitful, but most have stayed with stimulation rather than attempting to go back to destructive lesions. Some of the ideas presented in this volume may cause surgeons to rethink that position.


Catheter Lithium Morphine Neurol Naloxone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Long DM: Surgical therapy of chronic pain. Neurosurgery 1980; 6 (3): 317–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pool JL: Psychosurgery in elderly people. J Am Geriatr Soc 1956; 2: 456–465.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basbaum AI, Fields HL: Endogenous pain control mechanisms: Review and hypothesis. Ann Neurol 1978; 4: 451–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Willis WD Jr (ed): Pain and Headache, Gildenberg PL (series ed), vol 8: The Pain System: The Neural Basis of Nociceptive Transmission in the Mammalian Nervous System. New York, Karger, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baskin DS, Mehler WR, Hosobuchi Y, et al: Autopsy analysis of the safety, efficacy and cartography of electrical stimulation of the central gray in humans. Brain Res 1986; 371: 231–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boivie J, Meyerson BA: A correlative anatomical and clinical study of pain suppression by deep brain stimulation. Pain 1982; 13: 113–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adams JE, Hosobuchi Y, Fields HL: Stimulation of the internal capsule for relief of chronic pain. J Neurosurg 1974; 41: 740–744.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fields HL, Adams JE: Pain after cortical injury relieved by electrical stimulation of the internal capsule. Brain 1974; 97: 169–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hosobuchi Y, Adams JE, Rutkin B: Chronic thalamic and internal capsule stimulation for the control of central pain. Surg Neurol 1975; 4: 91–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hosobuchi Y, Adams JE, Linchitz R: Pain relief by electrical stimulation of the central gray matter in humans and its reversal by Naloxone. Science 1977; 197: 183–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hosobuchi Y, Rossier J, Bloom FE, et al: Stimulation of human periaqueductal gray for pain relief increases immunoreactive 3-endorphin in ventricular fluid. Science 1979; 203: 279–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hosobuchi Y: Subcortical electrical stimulation for control of intractable pain in humans. Report of 122 cases (1970–1984). J Neurosurg 1986; 64: 543–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazars G, Roge R, Mazars Y: Results of the stimulation of the spinothalamic fasciculus and their bearing on the physiopathology of pain. Rev Neurol 1960; 103: 136–138.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mazars GJ: Intermittent stimulation of nucleus ventralis posterolateralis for intractable pain. Surg Neurol 1975; 4: 93–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    North RB, Fowler KM: Computer-controlled, patient-interactive, multichannel, implanted neurological stimulators. Appl Neurophysiol 1987; 50: 39–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reynolds DV: Surgery in the rat during electrical analgesia induced by focal brain stimulation. Science 1969; 164: 444–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Richardson DE, Akil H: Pain reduction by electrical stimulation in man (part I). J Neurosurg 1977; 47: 178–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Siegfried J: Monopolar electrical stimulation of nucleus ventroposteromedialis thalami for postherpetic facial pain. Appl Neurophysiol 1982; 45: 179–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Long D, Hagfors N: Electrical stimulation in the nervous system: The current status of electrical stimulation of the nervous system for relief of pain. Pain 1975; 1: 109–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Young RF, Kroening R, Fulton W, et al: Electrical stimulation of the brain in treatment of chronic pain: experience over 5 years. J Neurosurg 1985; 62: 389–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Young RF, Brechner T: Electrical stimulation of the brain for relief of intractable pain due to cancer. Cancer 1986; 57: 1266–1272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Adams JE: Naloxone reversal of analgesia produced by brain stimulation in the human. Pain 1976; 2: 161–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Akil H, Richardson DE, Hughes J: Enkephalin-like material elevated in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid of pain patients after analgesic focal stimulation. Science 1978; 201: 463–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amano K, Kitamura K, Kawamura H: Alterations of immunoreactive 13-endorphin in the third ventricular fluid in response to electrical stimulation of the human periaqueductal gray matter. Appl Neurophysiol 1980; 43: 150–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fessier RG, Brown FD, Rachlin JR: Elevated 3-endorphin in cerebrospinal fluid after electrical brain stimulation: Artifact of contrast infusion. Science 1984; 224: 1017–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kuhar M, Pert C, Snyder S: Regional distribution of opiate receptor binding in monkey and human brain. Brain 1973; 245: 447.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liebeskind JC, Guilbaud G, Besson JM, et al: Analgesia from electrical stimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter in the cat. Behavioral observations and inhibitory effects on spinal cord interneurons. Brain Res 1973; 40: 441–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mayer DJ, Hayes RL: Stimulation-produced analgesia: Development of tolerance and cross-tolerance to morphine. Science 1975; 188: 941–943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pert CB, Snyder SH: Opiate receptor: Demonstration in nervous tissue. Science 1973; 179: 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abram S, Reynolds A, Cusick J: Failure of Naloxone to reverse analgesia from transcutaneous electrical stimulation in patients with chronic pain. Anesth Analg (Cleveland) 1981; 60 (2): 81–84.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chapman C, Benedetti C: Analgesia following transcutaneous electrical stimulation and its partial reversal by a narcotic antagonist. Life Sci 1977; 21: 1645–1648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dionne RA, Muller GP, Youbng RF, et al: Contrast medium causes the apparent increase in 3-endorphin levels in human cerebrospinal fluid following brain stimulation. Pain 1980; 20: 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Freeman TB, Campbell JN, Long DM: Naloxone does not affect pain relief induced by electrical stimulation in man. Pain 1983; 17: 189–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sjolund B, Erikson M: The influence of Naloxone on analgesia produced by peripheral condition stimulation. Brain Res 1979; 173: 295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Woolf CJ, Mitchell D, Myers RA, et al: Failure of Naloxone to reverse peripheral transcutaneous electro-analgesia in patients suffering from acute traumas. S Afr Med J 1978; 53: 179–180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mayer DJ, Wolfe TL, Akil H, et al: Analgesia from electrical stimulation in the brainstem of the rat. Science 1971; 174: 1351–1354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mayer DJ, Liebeskind JC: Pain reduction by focal electrical stimulation of the brain: An anatomical and behavioral analysis. Brain Res 1974; 68: 73–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mayer DJ, Price DD: Central nervous system mechanisms of analgesia. Pain 1976; 2: 379–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ranck J: Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review. Brain Res 1975; 98: 417–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stillings D: A survey of the history of electrical stimulation for pain to 1900. Med Instrum (Baltimore) 1975; 9 (6): 255–259.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Plotkin R: Results in 60 cases of deep brain stimulation for chronic intractable pain. Appl Neurophysiol 1982; 45: 173–178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Long DM, Erickson D, Campbell J, et al: Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nerves for pain control. Appl Neurophysiol 1981; 44: 207–217.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donlin M. Long
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations