The State of DNA Modification within and Flanking Maize Transposable Elements

  • Jeffrey L. Bennetzen
  • Willis E. Brown
  • Patricia S. Springer
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 47)


Modification of the Mu1-like transposable elements, primarily or exclusively 5-methylcytosine in the sequences 5′-CG-3′ and 5′-CNG-3′, is strongly correlated with the loss of Mutator activity. Chromosomal copies of Mu1-like elements and the maize retrotransposon Bs1 are fully digested by 5-methylcytosine-sensitive restriction enzymes in DNA from plants in which element transposition has been detected. In some cases, Mutator activity may be lost through a process not associated with Mu element modification. Under other circumstances, particularly inbreeding for the Mutator trait, Mu element modification and loss of Mutator activity are concurrent. When Mu element modification occurs, HinfI and MluI sites in and near the Mu1 terminal inverted repeats are often modified first. Modification at these HinfI sites is not seen in some lines that had lost Mutator activity one or more generations earlier, and are fully modified at sites within the Mu element. The Mu1-internal NotI and EcoRII sites are always and exclusively modified in any Mutator-derived line that has lost activity through a modification-associated process. Extensive modification within a Mu element does not lead to detected modification in flanking sequences.

In crosses between Mutator-loss plants with modified Mu elements and active Mutator plants with unmodified Mu elements, the progeny initially contain a mixture of modified and unmodified elements. During development of the plant, the ratio of modified to unmodified elements progressively increases. This gradual dominance of modified elements is approximately equivalent regardless of whether the Mutator-loss plant was the male or female parent.


Transposable Element Mutator Activity Cytosine Methylation Transpositional Activity MluI Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alleman, M., and M. Freeling (1986) The Mu transposable elements of maize: Evidence for transposition and copy number regulation during development. Genetics 112:107–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barker, R.F., D.V. Thompson, D.R. Talbot, J. Swanson, and J.L. Bennetzen (1984) Nucleotide sequence of the maize transposable element Mu1. Nucl. Acids Res. 12:5955–5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennetzen, J.L. (1984) Transposable element Mu1 is found in multiple copies only in Robertson’s Mutator maize lines. J. Molec. Appl. Genet. 2:519–524.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennetzen, J.L., J. Swanson, W.C. Taylor, and M. Freeling (1984) DNA insertion in the first intron of maize Adh1 affects message levels: Cloning of progenitor and mutant Adh1 alleles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 81:4125–4128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bennetzen, J.L. (1985) The regulation of Mutator function and Mu1 transposition. UCLA Symposium on Molecular and Cellular Biology 35:343–354.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bennetzen, J.L. (1987) Covalent DNA modification and the regulation of Mutator element transposition in maize. Molec. Gen. Genet. 208:45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bennetzen, J.L., R.P. Fracasso, D.W. Morris, D.S. Robertson, and M.J. Skogen-Hagenson (1987) Concomitant regulation of Mu1 transposition and Mutator activity in maize. Molec. Gen. Genet. 108:57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bennetzen, J.L., A. Cresse, W.E. Brown, and L. Lee (1987) Molecular cloning of maize genes by transposon tagging with Mutator. UCLA Symposium on Molecular and Cellular Biology 62:183–204.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bennetzen, J.L. (1988) Inactivation and reactivation of a Mutator-derived bronze mutable allele in maize (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bennetzen, J.L., R.P. Fracasso, D. Horvath, and C. Carter (1988) Variable presence and modification of sequences related to transposable element Mu1 in non-Mutator maize lines (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bennetzen, J.L., and K.S. Schrick (1988) Active, single copy maize genes are flanked by diverse highly repetitive DNA sequences (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bennetzen, J.L., and K.S. Schrick (1988) Low copy number and highly repetitive DNA sequences in Zea mays are organized in respective modified and unmodified domains (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brink, R.A. (1973) Paramutation. Ann. Rev. Genet. 7:129–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown, W.E., D.S. Robertson, and J.L. Bennetzen (1987) Molecular analysis of multiple Mutator-derived alleles of the bronze locus of maize (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chandler, V.L., and V. Walbot (1986) DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 83:1767–1771.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chandler, V.L., C. Rivin, and V. Walbot (1986) Stable non-Mutator stocks of maize have sequences homologous to the Mu1 transposable element. Genetics 114:1007–1021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chomet, P.S., S. Wessler, and S.L. Dellaporta (1987) Inactivation of the maize transposable element Activator (Ac) is associated with its DNA modification. EMBO J. 6:295–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cone, K.C., F.A. Burr, and B. Burr (1986) Molecular analysis of the maize anthocyanin regulatory locus C1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 83:9631–9635.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dellaporta, S.L., and P.S. Chomet (1985) The activation of maize controlling elements. In Genetic Flux in Plants, B. Hohn and E.S. Dennis, eds. Springer Verlag, Wien/New York, pp. 169–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Doerfler, W. (1983) DNA methylation and gene activity. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 52:93–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fedoroff, N.V., D.B. Furtek, and O.E. Nelson, Jr. (1984) Cloning of the bronze locus in maize by a simple and generalizable procedure using the transposable controlling element Activator (Ac). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 81:3825–3829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feinberg, A., and B. Vogelstein (1983) A technique for radio-labelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem. 132:6–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Furtek, D.B. (1986) Cloning and sequence analysis of the bronzel locus of maize: Location of a transposable element insertion and comparison of two wild-type alleles. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin at Madison.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Greenblatt, I.M. (1984) A chromosomal replication pattern deduced from pericarp phenotypes resulting from movements of the transposable element, Modulator, in maize. Genetics 108:471–485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gruenbaum, Y., T. Naveh-Many, H. Cedar, and A. Razin (1981) Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA. Nature 292:860–862.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hepburn, A.G., L.E. Clarke, L. Pearson, and J. White (1983) The role of cytosine methylation in the control of nopaline synthase gene expression in a plant tumor. J. Molec. Appl. Genet. 2:315–329.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jin, Y.K., and J.L. Bennetzen (1988) Structure and coding properties of Bs1, a maize retrovirus-like transposon (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Johns, M.A., J. Mottinger, and M. Freeling (1985) A low copy number, copia-like transposon in maize. EMBQ J. 4:1093–1102.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hake, S., and V. Walbot (1980) The genome of Zea mays, its organization and homology to related grasses. Chromosoma 79:251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kessler, C., P.S. Neumeier, and W. Wolf (1985) Recognition sequences of restriction endonucleases and methylases — A review. Gene 33:1–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kleckner, N. (1981) Transposable elements in prokaryotes. Ann. Rev. Genet. 15:341–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nevers, P., N.S. Shepherd, and H. Saedler (1986) Plant transposable elements. Adv. Bot. Res. 12:103–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nick, H., B. Bowen, R.J. Ferl, and W. Gilbert (1986) Detection of cytosine methylation in the maize alcohol dehydrogenase gene by genomic sequencing. Nature 319:243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    O’Reilly, C., N.S. Shepherd, A. Pereira, Z. Schwarz-Sommer, I. Bertram, D.S. Robertson, P.A. Peterson, and H. Saedler (1985) Molecular cloning of the al locus of Zea mays using the transposable elements En and Mu. EMBQ J. 4:877–882.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Riggs, A.D., and P.A. Jones (1983) 5-Methylcytosine, gene regulation, and cancer. Adv. Cancer Res. 40:1–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Robertson, D.S. (1978) Characterization of a mutator system in maize. Mutat. Res. 51:21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Robertson, D.S., and P.N. Mascia (1981) Tests of four controlling element systems of maize for mutator activity and their interaction with Mumutator. Mutat. Res. 84:283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Robertson, D.S. (1983) A possible dose-dependent inactivation of Mutator (Mu) in maize. Molec. Gen. Genet. 191:86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Robertson, D.S. (1986) Genetic studies of the loss of Mu mutator activity in maize. Genetics 113:765–773.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Robertson, D.S. (1986) Loss of Mu mutator activity when active Mu systems are transferred to inbred lines. In. Maize Genetics Cooperative Newsletter 60:10.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Robertson, D.S. (1987) Additional evidence on the correlation of somatic mutability and germinal mutator activity in Mu-induced aleurone mutants. In Maize Genetics Cooperative Newsletter 61:13–14.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schwartz, D., and E. Dennis (1986) Transposase activity of the Ac controlling element in maize is regulated by its degree of methylation. Molec. Gen. Genet. 205:476–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shapiro, H.S. (1976) Distribution of purines and pyrimidines in deoxyribonucleic acids. In CRC Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, G.D. Fasman, ed. CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio, pp. 241–283.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shure, M., S. Wessler, and N. Fedoroff (1983) Molecular identification and isolation of the Waxy locus in maize. Cell 35:225–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Taylor, L.P., and V. Walbot (1985) A deletion adjacent to the maize transposable element Mu-1 accompanies loss of Adh1 expression. EMBO J. 4:869–876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Taylor, L.P., V.L. Chandler, and V. Walbot (1986) Insertion of 1.4 kb and 1.7 kb Mu elements into the Bronze-1 gene of Zea mays. Maydica 31:31–46.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Van Slogteren, G.M.S., P.J.J. Hooykaas, and R.A. Schilperoort (1984) Silent T-DNA genes in plant lines transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens are activated by grafting and 5-azacytidine treatment. Plant Molec. Biol. 3:333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Walbot, V., V. Chandler, and L. Taylor (1985) Alterations in the Mutator transposable element family of Zea mays. UCLA Symposium on Molecular and Cellular Biology 35:333–342.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Walbot, V. (1986) Inheritance of Mutator activity in Zea mays as assayed by somatic instability of the bz2-mul allele. Genetics 114:1293–1312.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey L. Bennetzen
    • 1
  • Willis E. Brown
    • 1
  • Patricia S. Springer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations