Fundamental Processes of Atomic Dynamics pp 51-77 | Cite as

# A Unified View of Collisions and Spectra

## Abstract

The interaction of electrons in an atomic system has historically and traditionally been viewed as falling into two main categories, spectroscopy and collisions. Pedagogically as well, most textbooks in quantum mechanics make this division, devoting their initial discussion to bound state problems and turning in later chapters to scattering. This dichotomy is artificial. Over the past two decades, research in atomic physics has in fact shown the usefulness, even as a point of view, of giving up the division into two categories and seeing both kinds of processes as essentially related. Thereby, links are established between elastic and inelastic electron atom scattering on the one hand and processes involving radiation such as photo absorption and ionization on the other.

These links are specifically codified in what has come to be called Quantum Defect Theory. The effects of interactions at short range are separated from those arising at larger values of the radial distance r of an electron from the rest of the atom. The latter is usually motion in a standard field such as the Coulomb field and can be handled analytically. It is also this latter motion which alone is sensitive to the asymptotic kinetic energy of the electron, so that discrete and continuum states are distinguished only in this large-r behavior. The short range behavior involves multi-particle aspects of the problem, nonlocal (exchange) forces and other such complications but, on the other hand, is insensitive to energy so that it can be parameterized by a limited set of quantities common to both bound and scattering states. Also, since this part of the study is restricted to a finite volume, the numerical calculations can be kept to a modest size.

This set of lectures will be an introduction to the unified view of collisions and spectroscopy. Starting with a simple illustration in potential scattering, we will move on to electron-atom scattering in both single and many channel contexts. Key elements to be presented are quantum defect theory and the basic parameters of that theory, and the so-called method of frame transformations for linking alternative descriptions that are suitable for describing the small- and large-r behavior. Negative ions and neutral atoms with closed shells are used for illustrative purposes.

## Keywords

Outgoing Wave Coulomb Field Bound State Energy Fragmentation Channel Ionization Limit## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.F. S. Ham, in Solid State Physics edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull, eds., Academic, New York (1955), Vol. 1, p. 127.Google Scholar
- 2.M. J. Seaton, Rep. Prog. Phys. 46, 167 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.U. Fano, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65, 979 (1975);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3a.J. J. Wynne and J. A. Armstrong, Comm. At. Mol. Phys. 8, 155 (1979).Google Scholar
- 4.U. Fano and A. R. P. Rau, Atomic Collisions and Spectra, Academic, Orlando (1985).Google Scholar
- 5.C. H. Greene, A. R. P. Rau and U. Fano, Phys. Rev. A 24, 2441 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.C. H. Greene and Ch. Jungen, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 21., 51 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.V. A. Zilitis, Opt. Spectrosc. 43, 603 (1977);ADSGoogle Scholar
- 7a.W. R. Johnson and K. T. Cheng, J. Phys. B12, 863 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 8.L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, McGraw Hill, New York (1968), 3rd edition, p. 40.Google Scholar
- 9..ref. 8, p. 354.Google Scholar
- 10.L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, Pergamon, Oxford (1977), 3rd edition, p. 106.Google Scholar
- 11.E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 73, 1002 (1948).ADSzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.E. U. Condon and G. H. Shortley, The Theory of Atomic Spectra, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1951), Sec. 7
^{4}.Google Scholar - 13.E. U. Condon and G. H. Shortley, The Theory of Atomic Spectra, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1951) 12, Sec. 6
^{12}.Google Scholar - 14.A. R. P. Rau and U. Fano, Phys. Rev. A4, 1751 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 15.H. Hotop, T. A. Patterson and W. C. Lineberger, Phys. Rev. A8, 762 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
- 16.M. Abramowitz and T. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York (1965), chapter 14.Google Scholar
- 17.L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, McGraw Hill, New York (1968), 3rd edition, p. 40, Sec. 39.Google Scholar
- 17a.See also R. G. Newton, Scattering Theory of Waves and Particles, Springer-Verlag, New York (1982).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 18.U. Fano and J. W. Cooper, Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 441 (1968), Fig. 1.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.P. G. Burke and D. Robb, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 11, 144 (1975);Google Scholar
- 19a.U. Fano and C. M. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1573 (1973);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19b.C. M. Lee, Phys. Rev. A 10, 584 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.U. Fano, Phys. Rev. A 2, 353 (1970);MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20a.G. Herzberg and Ch. Jungen, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 41, 425 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.A. F. Starace, J. Phys. B 6, 76 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.K. T. Lu and U. Fano, Phys Rev. A 2, 81 (1970), and ref. 3.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.D. Dill, Phys. Rev. A 7, 1976 (1973);ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23a.J. A. R. Samson and J. L. Gardner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1327 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.K. T. Lu, Phys. Rev. A4, 579 (1971);ADSGoogle Scholar
- 24a.C M. Lee and K. T. Lu, Phys. Rev. A8, 1241 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar