Advertisement

Hormone-Dependent and Hormone-Independent Conformational Transitions of the Estrogen Receptor

  • Jeffrey C. Hansen
  • Jack Gorski
Part of the Serono Symposia, USA book series (SERONOSYMP)

Abstract

From a chemical perspective, steroid hormones are simple molecules. Yet from a biological perspective, steroid hormones are complex molecules that are capable of coordinating and regulating a diverse number of biological processes. At the cellular level, the crucial links between the chemically simple and biologically complex nature of steroid hormones are specific receptor proteins that bind steroids with very high affinity, and are found exclusively in cells that respond to hormone. In effect, steroid hormone receptors are macromolecular information transducers in that they couple broad biological input, i.e., the cumulative information that leads to synthesis of a steroid molecule, to dramatic cellular response. Since cellular responses are strictly dependent on the interaction of hormone and receptor, it has been of considerable interest to biochemists and molecular biologists to define the molecular mechanisms involved in hormone-dependent modulation of steroid receptor activity. In addition, the emerging evidence that steroid receptors are also intimately involved in many diseases has provided additional impetus to understand better the mechanism of steroid receptor action in target cells.

Keywords

Estrogen Receptor Partition Coefficient Glucocorticoid Receptor Steroid Receptor Hormone Binding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jensen EV, DeSombre ER. Estrogen-receptor activation. Science 1973; 182: 126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gorski J, Gannon F. Current models of steroid hormone action: a critique. Annu Rev Physiol 1976; 38: 425–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grody WW, Schrader WT, O’Malley BW. Activation, transformation, and subunit structure of steroid hormone receptors. Endocr Rev 1982; 3: 141–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andreasen PA. Aqueous two-phase partitioning for the study of steroid receptor activation. In: Litwack G, ed. Biochemical actions of hormones. New York: Academic Press, 1987: 181–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamamoto K, Alberts BM. In vitro conversion of estradiol receptor protein to its nuclear form. Dependence on hormone and DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1972; 69: 2105–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamamoto KR. Characterization of the 4S and 5S forms of the estradiol receptor protein and their interaction with deoxyribonucleic acid. J Biol Chem 1974; 249: 7068.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jensen EV, Suzuki T, Kawashima T, Stumpf WE, Jungblut PW, DeSombre ER. A two-step mechanism for the interaction of estradiol with rat uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1968; 59: 632–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atger M, Milgrom E. Mechanism and kinetics of the thermal activation of glucocorticoid hormone-receptor complex. J Biol Chem 1976; 251: 4758–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joab I, Radanyi C, Renoir M, et al. Common non-hormone binding component in non-transformed chick oviduct receptors of four steroid hormones. Nature 1984; 308: 850–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Catelli MG, Binart N, Jung-Testas I, et al. The common 90-kd protein component of non-transformed ‘8S’ steroid receptors is a heat-shock protein. EMBO J 1985; 4: 3131–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sanchez ER, Toft DO, Schlesinger MJ, Pratt WB. Evidence that the 90-kDa phosphoprotein associated with the untransformed L-cell glucocorticoid receptor is a murine heat shock protein. J Biol Chem 1985; 280: 12398–401.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sherman MR, Stevens J. Structure of mammalian steroid receptors: evolving concepts and methodological developments. Annu Rev Physiol 1984; 46: 83–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansen JC, Gorski J. Conformational and electrostatic properties of unoccupied and liganded estrogen receptors determined by aqueous two-phase partitioning. Biochemistry 1985; 24: 6078–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Albertsson PA. Partition between polymer phases. J Chromatogr 1978; 159: 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Albertsson PA. Interaction between biomolecules studied by phase partition. Methods Biochem Anal 1983; 29: 1–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Albertsson PA. Partition of cell particles and macromolecules. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krust A, Green S, Argos P, et al. The chicken oestrogen receptor sequence: homology with v-erbA and the human oestrogen and glucocorticoid receptors. EMBO J 1986; 5: 891–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hollenberg SM, Weinberger C, Ong ES, et al. Primary structure and expression of a functional human glucocorticoid receptor cDNA. Nature 1985; 318: 635–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miesfeld R, Rusconi S, Godowski PJ, et al. Genetic complementation of a glucocorticoid receptor deficiency by expression of cloned receptor cDNA. Cell 1986; 46: 389–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jeltsch JM, Krozowski Z, Quirin-Stricker C, et al. Cloning of the chicken progesterone receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83: 5424–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andreasen PA. Conversions of the glucocorticoid receptor complex of rat thymocyte cytosol, studied by partition in an aqueous dextranpolyethylene glycol two-phase system. Biochim Biophys Acta 1978; 540: 484–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andreasen PA, Mainwaring WIP. Aqueous two-phase partition studies of the glucocorticoíd receptor. Activation and pH-dependent changes of rat liver glucocorticoid-receptor complex in partly purified preparations. Biochim Biophys Acta 1980; 631: 334–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andreasen PA. A specific adenine nucleotide effect on the rat liver glucocorticoid receptor, demonstrated by aqueous two-phase partitioning. Biochim Biophys Acta 1981; 676: 205–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andreasen PA, Gehring U. Activation and partial proteolysis of variant glucocorticoid receptors, studied by two-phase partitioning. Eur J Biochem 1981; 120: 443–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Andreasen PA. Changes in net charge of glucocorticoíd receptors by activation, and evidence for a biphasic activation kinetics. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1982; 28: 563–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Andreasen PA. Aqueous two-phase partition studies of glucocorticoid receptors exposed to limited trypsinization. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1983; 30: 229–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Andreasen PA, Junker K. Specific effects of monovalent cations and of adenine nucleotides on glucocorticoid receptor activation, as studied by aqueous two-phase partitioning. In: Moudgil VK, ed. Molecular mechanism of steroid hormone action. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1985: 199–224.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hansen JC, Gorski J. Conformational transitions of the estrogen receptor monomer. J Biol Chem 1986; 261: 13990–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johansson G. Partition of proteins and micro-organisms in aqueous biphasic systems. Mol Cell Biochem 1974; 4: 169–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brooks DE, Sharp KA, Bamberger S, Tamblyn CH, Seaman GVF, Walter H. Electrostatic and electrokinetic potentials in two polymer aqueous phase systems. J Colloid & Interface Sci 1984; 102: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Albertsson PA, Sasakawa S, Walker H. Cross partition and isoelectric points of proteins. Nature 1970; 228: 1329–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hansen JC. Characterization of the conformational transitions of the estrogen receptor monomer by partition in aqueous two-phase systems [Dissertation]. University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1986.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Axelsson C-G, Shanbhag VP. Histone-hydrocarbon interaction. Partition of histones in aqueous two-phase systems containing poly ethylene glycol)-bound hydrocarbons. Eur J Biochem 1976; 71: 419–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pinaev G, Tartakovsky A, Shanbhag VP, Johansson G, Backman L. Hydrophobic surface properties of myosin in solution as studied by partition in aqueous two-phase systems: effects of ionic strength, pH and temperature. Mol Cell Biochem 1982; 48: 65–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Johansson G, Shanbhag VP. Affinity partitioning, of proteins in aqueous two-phase systems containing polymer-bound fatty acids. I. Effect of polyethylene glycol palmitate on the partition of human serum albumin and a-lactalbumin. J Chromatogr 1984; 284: 63–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kopperschlager G, Johansson G. Affinity partitioning with polymer-bound cibacron blue F3G-A for rapid, large-scale purification of phosphofructokinase from baker’s yeast. Anal Biochem 1982; 124: 1 1724.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kopperschlager G, Lorenz G, Usbeck E. Application of affinity partitioning in an aqueous two-phase system to the investigation of triazine dye-enzyme interactions. J Chromatogr 1983; 259: 97–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Johansson G, Kopperschlager G, Albertsson P-A. Affinity partitioning of phosphofructokinase from baker’s yeast using polymer-bound cibacron blue F3G-A. Eur J Biochem 1983; 131: 589–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Miller CD, Hansen JC, Gorski J. Characterization of a potential (poly)nucleotide binding domain of the estrogen receptor by aqueous two-phase affinity partitioning [Abstract]. In: Endocrine Society program abstracts, 69th annual meeting, Indianapolis, June, 1987: 62.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moudgil VK, Vandenheede L, Hurd C, Eliezer N, Lombardo G. In vitro modulation of rat liver glucocorticoíd receptor by urea. J Biol Chem 1987; 262: 5180–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Moudgil VK, Hurd C. Transformation of calf uterine progesterone receptor: analysis of the process when receptor is bound to progesterone and RU38486. Biochemistry 1987; 26: 4994–5001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Green S, Chambon P. Oestradiol induction of a glucocorticoid-responsive gene by a chimaeric receptor. Nature 1987; 325: 75–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Godowski PJ, Rusconi S, Miesfeld R, Yamamoto KR. Glucocorticoid receptor mutants that are constitutive activators of transcriptional enhancement. Nature 1987; 325: 365–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hollenberg SM, Giguere V, Segui P, Evans RM. Colocalization of DNA-binding and transcriptional activation functions in the human glucocorticoid receptor. Cell 1987: 49: 39–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hansen JC, Gorski J. A kinetic analysis of the temperature-dependent transition of the estrogen receptor monomer (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Notides AC, Hamilton DE, Auer HE. A kinetic analysis of the estrogen receptor transformation. J Biol Chem 1975; 250: 3945–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bailly A, LeFevre B, Savouret J-F, Milgrom E. Activation and changes in sedimentation properties of receptors. J Biol Chem 1980; 255: 2729–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Muller R, Traish AM, Wotiz HH. Estrogen receptor activation precedes transformation. J Biol Chem 1983; 258: 9227–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sakai D, Gorski J. Estrogen receptor transformation to a high-affinity state without subunit-subunit interactions. Biochemistry 1984; 23: 3541–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Muller RE, Traish AM, Hirota T, Bercel E, Wotiz HH. Conversion of estrogen receptor from a state with low affinity for estradiol into a state of higher affinity does not require 4S to 5S dimerization. Endocrinology 1985; 116: 337–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Redeuilh G, Secco C, Mester J, Saulieu E-E. Transformation of the 8–9 S molybdate-stabilized estrogen receptor from low-affinity to high-affinity state without dissociation into subunits. J Biol Chem 1987; 262: 5530–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey C. Hansen
    • 1
  • Jack Gorski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations