Advertisement

Memory B Cells Generated in T Cell-Dependent Antibody Responses Colonise the Splenic Marginal Zone

  • Susan Oldfield
  • Liu Yong-Jun
  • Martin Beaman
  • C. M. MacLennan
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 237)

Abstract

The marginal zones are a major B cell compartment in both rat and human spleen. These B cells possess a distinct phenotype in that they express surface membrane IgM (slgM) with little surface membrane IgD (slgD). Although they do not recirculate as such, they are derived from recirculating precursors (1). They appear in normal numbers in congenitally athymic animals and much indirect evidence suggests they can be activated by thymus-independent type 2 (TI-2) antigens (2). However, experiments presented here indicate that some memory B cells generated during established T cell-dependent antibody responses colonise the marginal zones and take up the characteristic phenotype of marginal zone B cells. These cells have been revealed using a method developed by Claasen & Van Rooijen (3) in which haptenated enzymes are used to study the appearance of specific cells producing anti-hapten antibodies. These workers used this technique to identify antibody-secreting cells. However, during the course of the experiments reported it became clear that hapten-specific surface immunoglobulin can also be identified by this technique.

Keywords

Marginal Zone Human Spleen Post Immunisation Specific Plasma Cell Thoracic Duct Lymph 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D.S. Kumararatne, and I.C.M. MacLennan. Eur. J. Immunol. 11: 865 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.J.L. Lane, D. Gray, S. Oldfield, and I.C.M. MacLennan. Eur. J. Immunol. 16: 1569 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Claasen, and N. Van Rooijen. J. Histochem. and Cytochem. 33: 840 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Gray, D. Chassoux, I.C.M. MacLennan, and H. Bazin. Clin. exp. Immunol. 60: 70 (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O. Mäkelä, M. Kartinen, J.L.T. Pelkonen, and K. Karjalainen. J. Exp. Med. 148: 1645 (1978).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.K. Inman. J. Immunol. 114: 704 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W.L. Ford, in: “Handbook of Experimental Immunology”, D.M. Weir, ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, 3rd edition, Oxford (1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Hoffmann-Fezer, H. Rodt, M. Eulitz, S. Thierfelder. J. Immunol. Methods 13: 261 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Claasen, N. Kors, C.D. Dijkstra, and N. Van Rooijen. Immunol.J. Immunol. Methods 57: 399 (1985).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Benner, W. Hijmans, and J.J. Haaijman. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 46: 1 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F.G.M. Kroese, D. Opstelten, A.S. Wubbena, F.J. Deener, J. Ater, E.H. Schwander, L. de Leij, and P. Nieuwenhuis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 186: 81 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Nieuwenhius, and F.J. Keuning. Immunol. 26: 509 (1974).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Oldfield
    • 1
  • Liu Yong-Jun
    • 1
  • Martin Beaman
    • 1
  • C. M. MacLennan
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of ImmunologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations