Bioactive Peptides at the Neuromuscular Junction of Insects

  • Michael O’Shea


In a symposium on neurosecretion it may seem inappropriate to discuss the physiology and pharmacology of the skeletal neuromuscular junction. It is becoming clear, however, that in both vertebrates and invertebrates active substances other than the primary neuromuscular transmitters can exert profound effects at the neuromuscular junction. Such substances may be secreted by the motoneurons themselves thereby acting as cotransmitters. They may also be secreted by specialized neuromodulatory neurons which innervate the muscle to regulate the actions of the classical motoneurons. Finally they may be humoral substances secreted at a distance and carried to the target muscle in the circulation. Thus the neuromuscular junction appears in some organisms, especially invertebrates, to be a site for the integration of various secreted chemical signals. Since it is also relatively accessible for physiological and biochemical studies, it can provide a model for understanding how multiple secreted products contribute to the control of physiological processes. In this brief essay I will describe how secreted peptides are involved in neuromuscular transmission in insects. There seem to be at least two known types of action, first as peptidergic cotransmitters and second as humoral peptides which may be released rather close to the target muscle or at a greater distance. Since more is known about peptidergic cotransmission, most of this paper will be devoted to this type of action.


Neuromuscular Junction Neuromuscular Transmission Neurosecretory Cell Thoracic Ganglion Inhibitory Motoneuron 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams M.E., and O’Shea, M., 1983, Peptide cotransmitter at a neuromuscular junction, Science, 221: 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, C.A., and O’Shea, M., 1982, Neuropeptide proctolin (H-Arg-Try-Leu-Pro-Thr-OH): Immunocytochemical mapping of neurons in the central nervous system of the cockroach, J. Como. Neurol., 207: 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, B.E., 1967, Neuromuscular transmitter substance in insect visceral muscle, Science, 155: 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, B.E., and Starratt, A.N., 1975, Isolation of proctolin, a myotropic peptide from Periolaneta americana, J. Insect Phvsiol.. 21: 1879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans, P.D.,1987, Modulation of neuromuscular transmission in the locust by FMRFamidelike peptides, Symposium “Modulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity in nervous systems”, Il Ciocco, Abst.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, P.D., and O’Shea, M., 1977, An octopaminergic neurone modulates neuromuscular transmission in the locust. Nature. Lond., 270: 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, P.D., and O’Shea, M., 1978, The identification of an octopaminergic neurone and the modulation of a myogenic rhythm in the locust, J. exp. Biol., 73: 235.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, P.D., and Myers, C.M., 1986, Peptidergic and aminergic modulation of insect skeletal muscle, J. exp. Biol., 124: 143.Google Scholar
  9. Hoyle, G., Dagan, D., Moberly, B., and Colquhoun, W., 1974, Dorsal unpaired median insect neurons make neurosecretory endings on skeletal muscle. J. exp. Zool., 187: 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. May, T.E., Brown, B.E., and Clements, A.N., 1979, Experimental studies upon a bundle of tonic fibres in the locust extensor tibialis muscle, J. Insect Phvsiol., 25: 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Orchard, I., 1987, Adipokinetic hormones - an update, J. Insect Phvsiol., 33: 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. O’Shea, M., and Evans, P.D., 1979, Potentiation of neuromuscular transmission by an octopaminergic neurone in the locust, J. exp. Biol., 79: 169.Google Scholar
  13. O’Shea, M., and Bishop, C.A., 1982, Neuropeptide proctolin associated with an identified skeletal motoneuron, J. Neurosci., 2: 1242.Google Scholar
  14. O’Shea, M., and Schaffer, M., 1985, Neuropeptide function: The invertebrate contribution, A. Rev. Neurosci., 8: 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. O’Shea, M., and Adams, M., 1986, Proctolin: From “gut factor” to model neuropeptide, in: “Advances in Insect Physiology”, Vol. 19, P.D. Evans, and V.B. Wigglesworth, eds., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  16. Piek, T., and Mantel, P., 1977, Myogenic contractions in locust muscle induced by proctolin and by wasp Philanthus triangulum venom, J. Insect Phvsiol., 23: 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pearson, K.G., and Iles, J.F., 1971, Innervation of coxal depressor muscle in cockroach, “Periplaneta americana”, J. exn. Biol., 54: 215.Google Scholar
  18. Starratt, A.N., and Brown, B.E., 1975, Structure of the penta-peptide proctolin, a proposed neurotransmitter in insects, Life Sci., 17: 1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Walther, C., Schiebe, M., and Voigt, K.H., 1984, Synaptic and non-synaptic effects of molluscan cardioexcitatory neuropeptides on locust skeletal muscle, Neurosc. Lett., 45: 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Walther, C., and Schiebe, M., 1987, FMR Famide-like peptides modulate neuromuscular transmission at locust skeletal muscle, Society for Experimental Biology, Basel, Abst.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael O’Shea
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Cell BiologyUniversity of London Royal Holloway and New Bedford CollegeEgham, SurreyEngland

Personalised recommendations