Long-Term Operation of Multichain Power Systems
It has a nonlinear objective function of the discharge and the head which itself is a function of the storage.
The production-energy function of the hydroplant is a nonseparable function of the discharge and the head.
There are linear constraints on both the state (storage or the head) and decision (release) variables.
It is a stochastic problem with respect to the river flows and demand for electricity.
KeywordsPower System Water Resource Research Operating Policy Water Resource System Local Feedback
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.1.Ackoff, R. L., Progress in Operations Research, Vol. 1, John Wiley, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
- 4.2.Amir, R., “Optimal Operation of a Multi-reservoir Water Supply System,” Report No. EEP-24, Progress in Engineering and Economic Planning, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1967.Google Scholar
- 4.6.Arunkumar, S., and Yeh, W. W-G., “Probabilistic Models in the Design and Operation of a Multi-purpose Reservoir System,” Contribution No. 144, California Water Resources Center, University of Calif., Davis, December 1973.Google Scholar
- 4.12.Beard, L. B., “Hydrologic Simulation in Water-Yield Analysis,” Technical Paper No. 10, Hydrolics Engineering Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California, 1964.Google Scholar
- 4.13.Beard, L. R., “Status of Water Resources Systems Analysis,” paper presented at Seminar on Hydrological Aspects of Project Planning, Hydrolics Engineering Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California, March 1972,Google Scholar
- 4.14.Beard, L. R., Weiss, A. C, and Austin, T. A., “Alternative Approaches to Water Resource System Simulation,” Technical Paper 32, Hydrolics Engineering Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, California, 1972.Google Scholar
- 4.15.Bechard, D., et al, “The Ottawa River Regulation Modeling System (ORRMS),” in Proceedings of International Symposium on Real-Time Operation of Hydrosystems, Vol. 1, pp. 179–198, University of Waterloo, Ontario, 1981.Google Scholar
- 4.17.Becker, L., Yeh, W. W-G., Fults, D., and Sparks, D., “Operations Models for the Central Valley Project,” Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management Division of the American Society of Civil Engineers 102(WR1), 101–115 (1976).Google Scholar
- 4.20.Berholtz, B., and Graham, L. J., “Hydrothermal Economic Scheduling, I, Solution by Incremental Dynamic Programming,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems 50, 921–932 (1960).Google Scholar
- 4.23.Bower, T. A., Hufschmidt, M. M., and Reedy, W. W., “Operating procedures: Their Role in Design of Water Resources Systems by Simulation Analysis,” in Design of Water Resources Systems, edited by A. Maass, pp. 444–460, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1962.Google Scholar
- 4.25.Christensen, G. S., and Soliman, S. A., “On the Application of Functional Analysis to the Optimization of the Production of Hydroelectric Power,” IEEE/PES, /JPGC 660–6, Portland, Oregon, October 19–23, 1986.Google Scholar
- 4.27.Turgeon, A., “Optimal Operation of a Multireservoir Hydro-Steam Power System,” in Large Scale Engineering Applications, edited by M. Singh and A. Titli, pp. 540–555, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.Google Scholar
- 4.29.Turgeon, A., “Optimal Short-Term Scheduling of Hydroplants in Series—A Review,” paper presented at Proceedings, International Symposium on Real-Time Operation of Hydrosystems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, June 1981.Google Scholar
- 4.39.Papageorgiou, M., and Mayr, R., “Optimal Real-Time Control of Combined Sewer Networks,” in IFAC Conference on System Analysis Applied to Water and Related Land Resources, pp. 17–22, Pergamon, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
- 4.41.Sage, A. P., Optimum System Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1968.Google Scholar