Risk Communication

  • Vincent T. Covello
  • Detlof von Winterfeldt
  • Paul Slovic
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Risk Analysis book series (CIRA, volume 3)


Risk communication takes place in a variety of forms, ranging from warning labels on consumer products to interactions among governmental officials, industry representatives, the media, and members of the public on such highly charged situations as Love Canal, ethylene dibromide (EDB) contamination of food, Three Mile Island, cigarette smoking, asbestos in school buildings, and Chernobyl. Experience has shown that risk communication efforts are a source of frustration for both risk communicators and for the intended recipients of the information. Government officials, industry representatives, and scientists note that laypeople frequently do not understand highly technical risk information and that individual biases and limitations may lead to distorted and inaccurate perceptions of many risk problems. Representatives of citizen groups and individual citizens are often equally frustrated, perceiving risk communicators and risk assessment experts to be uninterested in their concerns and unwilling to take immediate and direct actions to solve seemingly straightforward health, safety, and environmental problems. In this context, the media often plays the role of transmitter and translator of information between risk communicators and the public. But the media has been criticized for exaggerating risks and for emphasizing drama over scientific facts.


Conflict Resolution Risk Communication Seat Belt Joint Problem Individual Citizen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adler, R., and Pittle, R. D., 1984, Cajolery or command: Are education campaigns an adequate substitute for regulation?, Yale J. Reg. 1:159–193.Google Scholar
  2. Alcalay, R., 1983, The impact of mass communication in the health field, Social Sci. Med. 17:87–94.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, B., 1983, The Logic and Limits of Trust ,Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  4. Bingham, G., 1984, Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience ,The Conservation Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Bowonder, B., 1985, “Low Probability Event: A Case Study in Risk Assessment,” Unpublished paper presented at the workshop Risk Analysis in Developing Countries ,Hyderabad, India, Oct. 1985.Google Scholar
  6. Burger, E., 1984, Health Risks: The Challenge of Informing the Public ,The Media Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Busterud, J., 1980, Mediation: The state of the art, Environ. Pro. 2:34–39.Google Scholar
  8. Combs, B., and Slovic, P., 1979, Newspaper coverage of causes of death, Journalism Q. 56:837–843.Google Scholar
  9. Covello, V. T., 1983, The perception of technological risks: A literature review, Technol. Forecast. Social Change ,23:285–297.Google Scholar
  10. Covello, V. T., 1984, Uses of social and behavioral research on risk, Environ. Int. 10(June):541–545.Google Scholar
  11. Covello, V., von Winterfeldt, D., and Slovic, P., 1986, Communicating scientific information about health and environmental risks: Problems and opportunities from a social and behavioral perspective, in: Uncertainties in Risk Assessment and Risk Management (V. Covello, L. B. Lave, A. Moghissi, and V. R. R. Uppuluri, eds.), pp. 221–239, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Conrad, J. (ed.), 1980, Society, Technology, and Risk Assessment ,Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Cormick, G. W., 1980, The theory and practice of environmental mediation, Environ. Pro. 2:24–33.Google Scholar
  14. Coser, L. A., 1956, The Functions of Social Conflict. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Creighton, J. L., 1980, Public Involvement Manual: Involving the Public in Water and Power Resource Discussions. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. Cutter, S., and Barnes, K., 1982, Evacuation behavior and Three Mile Island, Disasters 6:116–124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Delli Priscoli, J., Creighton, J., and Dunning, C.M. (eds.), 1983, Public Involvement Techniques: A Reader of Ten Years Experience of the Institute for Water Resources ,U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, IWR Research Report 82-R1, May, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. Douglas, M., 1966, Purity and Danger ,Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A., 1982, Risk and Culture ,University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  19. Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S., 1985, Psychological theories of persuasion, in: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (L. Berkowitz, ed.), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Earle, T. C., 1984, “Risk Communication: A Marketing Approach,” Unpublished paper presented at the National Science Foundation/Environmental Protection Agency Workshop on Risk Perception and Risk Communication ,Long Beach, California, Dec. 1984.Google Scholar
  21. Earle, T. C., and Cvetkovich, G., 1983, Risk judgment and the communication of hazard information: Toward a new look in the study of risk perception, BH ARC (400/83/017), Battelle Human Affairs Research Centers, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  22. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1984, Risk-Assessment and Risk Management: Framework for Decision Making ,Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., Dec. 1984.Google Scholar
  23. Evans, S. H., and Clarke, P., 1983, When cancer patients fail to get well: Flaws in health communication, in: Communication Yearbook 7 (R. N. Bostrom, ed.), Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  24. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., and Combs, B., 1978, How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits, Pol. Sci. 8:127–152.Google Scholar
  25. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S., 1979, Weighing the risks, Environment 21:17–20, 32–38.Google Scholar
  26. Fischhoff, B., Watson, S., and Hope, C., 1984, Defining risk, Pol. Sci. 17:123–139.Google Scholar
  27. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research ,Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  28. Friedman, S. M., 1981, Blueprint for breakdown: Three Mile Island and the mass media before the accident, J. Commun. 31:85–96.Google Scholar
  29. Gibson, M. (ed.), 1985, To Breathe Freely: Risk, Consent, and Air ,Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  30. Green, C. H., 1980, Risk: Attitudes and beliefs, in: Behavior in Fires ,(D. V. Canter, ed.), Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  31. Greene, M., Perry, R. W., and Lindell, M. K., 1980, The March 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens: Citizens perceptions of volcano hazard, Disasters 2:49–66.Google Scholar
  32. Gross, J. L., and Rayner, S., 1983, Measuring Culture: A Paradigm for the Analysis of Social Organization, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Hodler, T. W., 1982, Residents’ preparedness and response to the Kalamazoo tornado, Disasters 2:44–49.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, B., and Covello, V. (eds.), 1987, The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk ,Reidel, Boston.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, E. J., and Tversky, A., 1983, Affect, generalization and the perception of risk, J. Person. Social Psychol. 45:20–31.Google Scholar
  36. Kasperson, R., and Kasperson, J., 1983, Determining the acceptability of risk: Ethical and policy issues, in: Risk: A Symposium (J. Rogers and D. Bates, eds.), pp. 133–155, The Royal Society of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  37. Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Kiesler, C A., Collins, B. E., and Miller, N., 1968, Attitude Change ,Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Kunreuther, H., Ginsberg, R., Miller, L., Sagi, P., Slovic, P., Borkan, B., and Katz, N., 1978, Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons ,Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Lagadec, P., 1982, Major Technological Disaster ,Pergamon, Oxford. Levine, A. G., 1982, Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People ,D. C. Heath, Lexington, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  41. Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., and Coombs, B., 1978, Judged frequency of lethal events, J. Exp. Psychol. [Hum. Learn.] 4:551-578.Google Scholar
  42. Lindell, M., Bolton, P. A., Perry, R. W., Stoetzel, G. A., Martin, J. B., and Flynn, C. B., 1985, Planning Concepts and Decision Criteria for Sheltering and Evacuation in a Nuclear Power Plant Emergency, Technical Report No. AIF/NESP-031, Batelle Human Affairs Research Centers, Seattle, Washington, June, 1985.Google Scholar
  43. Lindell, M., Perry, W., and Greene, M., 1983, Individual response to emergency preparedness planning near Mt. St. Helens, Disast. Man. (Jan.-March):5-ll.Google Scholar
  44. Lipset, S., and Schneider, W., 1983, The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor and Government in the Public Mind ,The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Lowrance, W., 1976, Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety ,Kaufman, Los Altos, California.Google Scholar
  46. Luce, D., and Raiffa, H., 1957, Games and Decisions ,Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Maccoby, N., Farquhar, J., Wood, P., and Alexander, J., 1977, Reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease: Effects of a community-based campaign on knowledge and behavior, J. Community Health 3:100– 114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Maccoby, N., and Solomon, D. S., 1981, Heart disease prevention: Community studies, in: Public Communica tion Campaigns ,(R. E. Rice and W. J. Paisley, eds.), Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  49. Mac-Lean, D. (ed.), 1986, Values at Risk ,Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  50. Mazur, A., 1973, Disputes between experts, Minerva 11:243–262. .Google Scholar
  51. Mazur, A., 1981, The Dynamics of Technical Controversy ,Communications Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  52. Mazur, A., 1980, Media coverage and public opinion on scientific controversies, J. Commun. Res. 31:106– 115.Google Scholar
  53. Media Institute, 1985, Chemical Risks: Fears, Facts, and the Media ,Media Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  54. Mileti, D., 1975, Natural Hazard Warning Systems in the U.S.: A Research Assessment ,Technical Report, Institute for Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  55. Mileti, D., Drabek, T., and Haas, E., 1975, Human Behavior in Extreme Environments ,University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
  56. Mc-Guire, W. J., 1985, Attitudes and attitude change, in: Handbook of Social Psychology (G. Lindzey and A. Aronson, eds.), Addison-Wiley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  57. McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., Jr., and Tversky, A., 1982, On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies, N. Engl. J. Med. 306:1259–1262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitchell, R. C, 1980, Public Opinion on Environmental Issues: Results of a National Public Opinion Survey, Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  59. Morris, L., Mazis, M., and Barofsky, I. (eds.), 1980, Product Labeling and Health Risks ,Banbury Report 6, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.Google Scholar
  60. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, 1978, Saccharin: Technical Assessment of Risks and Benefits. Committee for a Study on Saccharin and Food Safety Policy ,National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. (Second Ed.) Sage: Beverly Hills, 1984.)Google Scholar
  61. Nelkin, D., (ed.), 1978, Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions ,Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  62. Nilson, L. B., and Nilson, D. C., 1981, Resolving the “sooner vs. later” controversy surrounding the public announcement of earthquake predictions, Disasters 5:391–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. O’Hare, M., 1977, Not on my block you don’t: Facility siting and the strategic importance of compensation, Public Policy 197:25:407–458.Google Scholar
  64. O’Hare, M., 1987, Bargaining and negotiation for a conflict resolution, in: Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks (P. Kleindorfer and H. Kunreuther, eds.), pp. 178–198, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  65. Otway, H., Maurer, D., and Thomas, K., 1978, Nuclear power: The question of public acceptance, Futures 10:109–118.Google Scholar
  66. Otway, H. J., 1980, Risk perception: A psychological perspective, in: Technological Risk: Its Perspective and Handling in Europe ,(M. Dierkes, S. Edwards, and R. Coppock, eds.), Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain, Boston.Google Scholar
  67. Otway, H. J., and von Winterfeldt, D., 1982, Beyond acceptable risk: On the social acceptability of technologies, Policy Sci. 8:127–152.Google Scholar
  68. Pate-Cornell, M. E., Warning systems in risk management, Risk Anal. 6(2):223-234.Google Scholar
  69. Peltu, M., 1985, Risk communication: The role of the media, in: Risk and Regulation ,(H. Otway, ed.), Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  70. Perrow, C., 1984, Normal Accidents ,Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  71. Perry, R.W;Greene, M.R;Lindell M.K; 1980, Enhancing evacuation warning compliance: Suggestions for emergency planning, Disasters.4:433 – 449.Google Scholar
  72. Popper, F., 1985, The Environmentalists and the LULU (Local Unwanted Land Use), Environment (March).Google Scholar
  73. Quarantelli, E., and Dynes, R., 1977, Response to social crisis and disaster, Ann. Rev. Sociol. 3:23–49.Google Scholar
  74. Quarantelli, E. L., 1980, Evacuation Behavior and Problems: Findings and Implications from the Research Literature ,Department of Sociology, Disaster Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
  75. Raiffa, H., 1982, The Art and Science of Negotiation ,Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  76. Renn, O., 1981, Man, technology, and risk: A study on intuitive risk assessment and attitudes towards nuclear power, Report Jul-Spez 115, Julich, Nuclear Research Center.Google Scholar
  77. Rice, R. E., and Paisley, W. J. (eds.), 1981, Public Communication Campaigns ,Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  78. Robertson, L., 1976, The great seat belt campaign flop, J. Commun. 26:41–45.Google Scholar
  79. Robertson, L., Kelley, A., O’Neill, B., Wixom, C., Eiswirth, R., and Haddon, W., 1974, A controlled study of the effect of television messages on safety belt use, Am. J. Public Health 64:1071–1081.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Rogers, E. M., and Sood, R., 1981, “Mass media operations in a quick-onset natural disaster: Hurricane David in Dominica,” Working paper, Annenberg School of Communications, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  81. Rothman, S., 1982, Risk and nuclear power: Scientists, journalists, and the public, Public Op. 3:47–52.Google Scholar
  82. Ruckelshaus, W., 1984, Risk in a free society, Risk Anal. 4(3):157–163.Google Scholar
  83. Saarinen, T. (ed.), 1982, Perspectives on Increasing Hazard Awareness ,Institute of Behavioral Science, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  84. Sandman, P. M., and M. Paden, 1979, At Three Mile Island, Columbia Journalism Rev. 18(no. 2, July–Aug.):43–58.Google Scholar
  85. Sandman, P., 1973, Environmental advertising and social responsibility, in : Mass Media and the Environment (D. Rubin and D. Sachs, eds.), Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  86. Sharlin, H. I., 1985, EDB: A Case Study in the Communication of Health Risk ,Office of Policy Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  87. Shelanski, V., Sills, D., and Wolf, C., 1982, The Accident at Three Mile Island ,Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  88. Short, J., 1984, The social fabric of risk, Am. Sociol. Rev. (December).Google Scholar
  89. Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., and Fischhoff, B., 1979, Images of disaster: Perceptions and acceptance of risks from nuclear power, in: Energy Risk Management (G. Goodman and W. Rowe, eds.), Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  90. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S. 1980, Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk, in: Social Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? (R. Schwing and W. A. Albers, eds.), Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  91. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.), 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases ,pp. 464–489, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  92. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S., 1980, Informing people about risk, in: Product Labeling and Health Risks (L. Morris, M. Mazis, and I. Barofsky, eds.), Banbury Report 6, The Banbury Center, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.Google Scholar
  93. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S., 1981, Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications, in: The Assessment and Perception of Risk (F. Warner and D. H. Slater, eds.), The Royal Society, London.Google Scholar
  94. Squyres, W. D., 1980, Patient Education ,Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  95. Susskind, L. E., 1978, The Importance of Citizen Participation and Consensus-Building in the Land Use Planning Process ,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Architecture and Planning, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  96. Susskind, L. Richardson, Jr., and Hildebrand, K., 1978, Resolving Environmental Disputes: Approaches to Intervention, Negotiation, and Conflict Resolution ,Environmental Impact Assessment Project, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  97. Sutton, S. R., 1982, Fear arousing communications: A critical examination of theory and research, in: Social Psychology and Behavioral Medicine (J. R. Eiser, ed.), pp. 303–338, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  98. Tribe, L. H., Corrine, S., Shelling, T., and Voss, E. (eds.), 1976, When Values Conflict: Essays on Environmental Analysis. Discourse and Decision ,Ballinger, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  99. Turner, R. H., Nigg, J. M., Paz, D. H., and Young, B. S., 1981, Community Response to Earthquake Threat in Southern California ,Institute for Social Science Research, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  100. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science 211:235–271.Google Scholar
  101. Twentieth Century Fund, 1984, Science in the Streets ,Priority Press, New York.Google Scholar
  102. Vertinsky, I., and Vertinsky, P., 1982, Communicating environmental health assessment and other risk infor mation: Analysis of strategies, in: Risk: A Seminar Series (H. Kunreuther, ed.), pp. 421–482, IIASA-CP-82-S2, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  103. Vlek, C., and Stallen, D. J., 1981, Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large, Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 28:235–271.Google Scholar
  104. von Winterfeldt, D., John, R. S., and Borcherding, K., 1981, Cognitive components of risk ratings, Risk Anal. 1:277–287.Google Scholar
  105. von Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W., 1986, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research ,Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  106. Weinstein, N. D., 1984, Why it won’t happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility, Health Psychol. 3:431–457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Weinstein, N.D., 1979, Seeking reassuring or threatening information about environmental cancer, J. Behav. Med. 2:125–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Wellborn, S., 1979, The Potential of Mediation for Resolving Environmental Disputes Related to Energy Facilities ,American Management Systems, Inc., DOE/EV/10274-1, Dec. 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent T. Covello
    • 1
  • Detlof von Winterfeldt
    • 2
  • Paul Slovic
    • 3
  1. 1.Risk Assessment ProgramNational Science FoundationUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Safety and System ManagementUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Decision ResearchEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations