Skip to main content

Diffusion of Software Engineering Methods

  • Chapter
  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

The success of software engineering as a discipline depends not only on our ability to come up with creative and innovation methods for addressing the problems of software development, but, also on our ability to effectively diffuse these innovations into practice. In order to succeed well in the latter role, we need to have a good understanding of the process of diffusing innovations in general, and how they apply in the context of diffusion of software engineering methods. This paper attempts to provide that understanding using Rogers’ framework for diffusion of innovations.

Roger’s framework is used to show that even though diffusion is a complex process it can be studied systematically, and successful diffusion can be facilitated by consciously planning a diffusion process that takes into account the underlying factors and issues. The attributes of innovations and communication aspects of innovations are identified as factors of special importance as they have significant impact on diffusion, and are, also, within the purview of the software engineering community. These ideas are developed and illustrated in the context of diffusion of program design methodologies. Using the understanding gained through these, a set of guidelines and recommendations are developed for successfully diffusing software engineering innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beal, G. M., Meehan, P., 1978, “The Role of Communication in Knowledge Production, Dissemination, and Utilization”, Research Committee on Mass Communications, 9th World Congress of Sociology, International Sociological Association, Uppsala, Sweden, September 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson et al., 1964, “A Study in Fertility Control”, Scientific American, 210, pp. 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolognani, M., and Corti, E., 1983, “Technology Transfer Processes in Software Development”, Proceedings of MELECON ‘83, Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, May 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. L., 1965, Adoption of Educational Innovations, Center for Educational Administration, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, D. R., 1984, “Tutorial Notes on Program Design Methodologies”, ACM Professional Development Seminars, December 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, A., 1973, A Study of the Attributes of Educational Innovations as Factors in Diffusion, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, K., 1985, “Factors Influencing Technology Transfer”, SIGCHI Bulletin, 12, (2), October 1985, pp. 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliegel, F. C., and Kivlin, J. E., 1966(a), “Attributes of Innovations as Factors in Diffus ion”, American Journal of Sociology, 72, pp. 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliegel, F. C., and Kivlin, J. E., 1966(b), “Farmers’ Perceptions of Farm Practice Attributes”, Rural Sociology, 31, pp. 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, P., 1983, “Software Engineering: Strategies for Technology Transfer”, Proceedings of International Computing Symposium on Applications Systems Development, Stutgartt, FDR, March 1983, pp. 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office, 1980, Wider Use of Better Computer Software Technology Can Improve Management Control and Reduce Costs, FGMSD-80–38, U. S. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.G.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayen, F. L., 1977, “An Investigation of the Application of Top-Down Design and Programming in Organizations”, Proceedings of AIDS National Meeting, Abstract, Chicago, Illinois, November 1977, p. 617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, R. E., 1977, Perceptions of an Innovation: Syracuse University Project Advance, Ph.D. Thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, J. B., 1977, “Are New Programming Techniques Used?”, Datamation, 23, (7), December 1977, pp. 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE Computer Society Press, 1983, IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Software Engineering Technology Transfer, April 25–27, 1983, IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl, E. R., 1970, “An Information Network for the Agricultural Sciences”, Agricultural Science Review,8, December 1970, pp. 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, M. J., 1980, “Considerations in the Transfer of Software Engineering Technology”, AFIPS Conference Proceedings: 1980 National Computer Conference, Arlington, VA, pp. 683–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redwine, S. T., 1983, “Some Suggested Policies to Aid Technology Transfer for the DoD Software Initiative”, IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Software Engineering Technology Transfer, April 25–27, 1983, pp. 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redwine, S. T., and Riddle, W. E., 1985, “Software Technology Maturation”, The Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Software Engineering, August 28–30, 1985, pp. 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., 1962, Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., and Kincaid, L., 1981, Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., 1983, “Bibliography of Diffusion Literature”, Diffusions of Innovations, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. M., 1966, Characteristics of Farm Innovations Associated With the Rate of Adoption, Agricultural Extension Education Report 14, Guelph, Ontario, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, J. H., and Lehman, J. H., 1979, The Results of a Survey on Management Techniques and Procedures Used in Software Development Projects in U.S. Aerospace Industry, Volume II, TR 79–54, Sacramento Air Logistics Center, McClelland AFB, California (Paper presented to the Research Committee on Mass Communication, 9th World Congress of Sociology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, C. R., Jr., 1977, “The Role of the Professional in Feeding Mankind”, The Proceedings of The 1976 World Food Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R. R., “Technology Transfer Takes 62 Years” IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Software Engineering Technology Transfer, April 25–27, 1983, pp. 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raghavan, S.A., Chand, D.R. (1987). Diffusion of Software Engineering Methods. In: Zunde, P., Agrawal, J.C. (eds) Empirical Foundations of Information and Software Science IV. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5472-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5472-7_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5474-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5472-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics