Advertisement

Applying Operations Research Models to the Study of Complex Man-Machine Interfaces

  • Ronald J. Reiner
  • Ashok K. Tandon

Abstract

The research reported here is one phase of a programmatic effort at the Essex Corporation to expand the system designer’s ability to assess the efficiency of complex man-machine interfaces. The first effort was development of the Computer-Aided Performance and Reliability Assessment (CAPRA) model which predicts time-on-task (TOT) and probability of success (Ps) for relatively simple interfaces. This paper describes the extension of the earlier research into the domain of multiple operators working with concurrent interfaces. Under this effort, the Multiple Operator/Parallel System Interface Evaluation (MOPSIE) model was developed. It utilizes conventional operations research techniques to better quantify task complexity and assess the importance of operator skill and intelligence.

MOPSIE equates the skill of the operator to the efficiency with which he can process his workload using the proposed interface. By assessing the importance of efficiency on productivity, the model is projecting the importance of operator skill on productivity. The model enumerates the multitude of paths which an operator can follow in order to process a given workload in the context of a concurrent interface. Every possible path represents a certain level of efficiency which can be quantified in terms of overall productivity. By comparing the best cases to the worst within the path set, the model can demonstrate the importance of operator skill and intelligence.

Keywords

Idle Time Operator Skill Good Path Single Large Copier Operation Research Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, K. R., 1974, Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Gaver, P., and Thompson, G. L., 1973, Programming and Probability Models in Operations Research, Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Monterey, California.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Newell, A., and Card, S. K., 1985, The Prospects for Psychological Science in Human Computer Interaction, 1, (3), 1985.Google Scholar
  4. Rasmussen, J., 1980, “The Human as a Systems Component”, Human Interaction with Computers, Smith, H. T., and Green, T. R. G., eds., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  5. Reiner, R., 1986, Maintainability Prediction Using Sophisticated Task Simulation, Paper presented at the 13’th International Reliability Availability and Maintainability Conference for the Electric Power Industry, June 1986, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  6. Reiner, R., and Weiss, E. C., 1986, Quantitative Techniques for Assessing Complex Man-Machine Interfaces, Final Report submitted to Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio, Contract No. F33615–85-C0016.Google Scholar
  7. Wagner, H. M., 1975, Principles of Operations Research, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald J. Reiner
    • 1
  • Ashok K. Tandon
    • 1
  1. 1.Essex CorporationAlexandriaUSA

Personalised recommendations