Skip to main content

Application of Enzyme Immunoassay in Veterinary Medicine: Serodiagnosis of Bovine Brucellosis

  • Chapter
Nonisotopic Immunoassay

Abstract

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) techniques have been applied in two principle areas of veterinary medicine; 1) antigen detection for direct demonstration of disease causing agents and 2) antibody detection for indirect or presumptive diagnosis of infection. EIA techniques have been chosen over other primary binding immunoassays (radio- and fluoro-) to replace many of the ‘conventional’ serological assays. EIA techniques offer many advantages; 1) the inherent dangers, waste disposal problems and limited shelf life associated with radioisotopes are not encountered; 2) whereas most fluoroimmunoassay techniques still require subjective or operator judgement, enzymic reactions (chromogenic) may be objectively quantitated with 96 well plate photometers; 3) although 96 well plate fluorimeters are now available, in general photometers are less expensive and far more flexible with respect to the range of chromogens which can be quantitated; 4) the 96 well plate format of EIA techniques has been the major focus for development of computer controlled, automated instrumentation and as a result of these technological advances, accuracy, precision and quality control has been greatly enhanced; 5) electronic data acquisition and processing of EIA results is now well established and supported by commercial or custom microcomputer software, is an important aspect of overall quality assurance in the diagnostic laboratory; 6) EIA techniques in general are faster and less expensive to perform and are technically less demanding than conventional assays such as serum neutralization and complement fixation; 7) EIA techniques, as primary binding assays, are not dependent on antibody specific functions which occur secondarily after binding to antigen (e. g. complement fixation, virus neutralization, bacterial agglutination, precipitation, etc.); 8) the immunological specificity and sensitivity of EIA techniques is adjustable through selection of appropriate antigens and detection reagents; 9) the use of monoclonal detection reagents in EIA techniques has greatly enhanced assay specificity and standardization and 10) the same EIA protocol and test sample may be used for simultaneous detection of antibody to a number of different diagnostic antigens from one or more infectious agents. For the reasons stated above and constant pressures to tailor diagnostic specificity and sensitivity to meet eradication, control and surveillance requirements for infectious diseases, EIA techniques have found wide application in veterinary medicine as applied to both food producing and companion animals. However, it is not our intention to review all of the applications of EIA techniques in veterinary medicine in this chapter, as an extensive bibliography has been recently published (Charan and Gautam, 1984).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. J. Baker and J. B. Wilson, Hypoferremia in mice and its application to the bioassay of endotoxin, J. Bacteriol. 90: 903–910 (1965).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. R. Bundle, M. A. J. Gidney, M. B. Perry, J. R. Duncan and J. W. Cherwonogrodzky, Serological confirmation of Bruceila abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0: 9 O-antigens by monoclonal antibodies, Infect. Immunity 46: 389–393 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. L. A. Canterro, J. E. Butler and J. W. Osborne, The adsorptive characteristics of proteins for polystyrene and their significance in solid-phase immunoassays, Analyt. Biochem. 105: 375–382 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Caroff, D. R. Bundle and M. B. Perry, Structure of the o-chain of the phenol-phase soluble cellular lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0: 9, Eur. J. Biochem. 139: 195–200 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Caroff, D. R. Bundle, M. B. Perry, J. W. Cherwonogrodzky and J. R. Duncan, Antigenic S-type lipopolysaccharide of Brucella abortus 1119-3, Infect. Immun. 46: 384–388 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Charan and O. P. Gautam, Applications of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in veterinary medicine: A bibliography, Vet. Res. Com. 8: 255–267 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. J. Corbel, Recent advances in the study of Brucella antigens and their serological cross-reactions, Vet. Bull. 55: 927–941 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Diaz, P. Garatea, L. M. Jones and I. Moriyon, Radial immunodiffusion test with a Brucella polysaccharide antigen for differentiating infected from vaccinated cattle, J. Clin. Microbiol. 10: 37–41 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. I. R. Dohoo, P. F. Wright, G. M. Ruckerbauer, B. S. Samagh, F. J. Robertson and L. B. Forbes, A comparison of five serological tests for bovine brucellosis. Can. J. Comp. Med. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. S. Galen and S. R. Gambino, 1975, Beyond normality: the predictive value and efficiency of medical diagnosis, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., pp. 167–221.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. M. Jones, D. T. Berman, E. Moreno, B. L. Devoe, M. J. Gilsdorf, M. J. Huber and P. Nicoletti, Evaluation of a radial immunodiffusion test with polysaccharide B antigen for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis, J. Clin. Microbiol. 12: 753–760 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Maggio (ed.), Enzyme immunoassay: principles and practices, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 1–295.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. K. Nakane and A. Kawaoi, Peroxidase-labelled antibody: a new method of conjugation, J. Histochem. Cytochem. 22: 1084–1091 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Nielsen, F. C. Heck, G. G. Wagner, J. Stiller, B. Rosenbaum, R. Pugh and E. Flores, Comparative assessment of antibody isotypes to Brucella abortus by primary and secondary binding assays, Prev. Vet. Med. 2: 197–204 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Nielsen and P. F. Wright, 1984, Enzyme immunoassay and its application to the detection of bovine antibody to Bovine abortus, Agriculture Canada/Animal Diseases Research Institute (publisher), Nepean, Ontario, pp. 1–121.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. W. Stemshorn, D. J. Buckley, G. St. Amour, C. S. Lin and J. R. Duncan, A computer-interfaced photometer and systematic spacing of duplicates to control within-plate enzyme-immnoassay variation, J. Immunol. Meth. 61: 367–375 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. P. F. Wright, W. A. Kelly and D. E. J. Gall, Application of a timing protocol to the reduction of inter-plate variability in the indirect enzyme immunoassay for detection of anti-Brucella antibody, J. Immunoassay 6: 189–205 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. P. F. Wright, D. E. J. Gall and W. A. Kelly, Effect of meniscus formation and duplicate sample placement configuration on the variability of measurement by three microtiter plate photometers, J. Immunol. Methods 81: 83–93 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wright, P.F., Nielsen, K.H. (1988). Application of Enzyme Immunoassay in Veterinary Medicine: Serodiagnosis of Bovine Brucellosis. In: Ngo, T.T. (eds) Nonisotopic Immunoassay. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5466-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5466-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5468-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5466-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics