Advertisement

Nephelometric Inhibition Immunoassay for Small Molecules

  • Chan S. Oh
  • James C. Sternberg

Abstract

The use of nephelometry, and especially rate nephelometry (Tiffany, Parella, Johnson and Burtis, 1974), for the measurement of specific serum proteins has become very well established. In nephelometric methods, the marked increases in light scattering which occur as a consequence of the immunochemical reaction between polyvalent antigens (such as proteins) and their antibodies is utilized. Thus, while solutions of protein molecules scatter only a small to moderate amount of visible light, their reactions with their specific antisera lead to the formation of crosslinked three dimensional immuno complexes large enough to scatter a significantly increased amount of light, and, eventually, to precipitate. In rate nephelometry, the rate of increase of light scattering during the course of this reaction is utilized to provide a measure of the protein concentration.

Keywords

Rate Signal Antibody Dilution Antibody Molecule High Rate Signal Immunochemical Reaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Green, N. M., 1965. A Spectrophotometric Assay for Avidin and Biotin Based on Binding of Dyes by Avidin. Biochemistry, 94: 23C.Google Scholar
  2. Green, N. M., Konieczny, L., Toms, E. J., and Valentine R. C., 1971, The Use of Bifunctional Biotinyl Compounds to Determine the Arrangement of Subunits in Avidin, Biochemistry, 125: 781–791.Google Scholar
  3. Heidelberger, M. and Kendall, F. E., 1935. A Quantitive Study and a Theory of the Reaction Mechanism, J. Experimental Medicine, 61: 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Oi, V. T., Vuong, T. M., Hardy, R., Reidler, J., Dangl, J. Herzenberg, L. A. and Stryer, L., 1984, Correlation Between Segmental Flexibility and Effector Function of Antibodies, Nature, 307: 136–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Riccom, H., Masson, P. L., Vaerman, J. P. and Heremans, J. F., 1972. An Automated Nephelometric Inhibition Immunoassay (NIIA) for Haptens, 9–11, in J. D. Hamm (ed)., Automated Immunoprecipitin Reactions. Technicon Instruments, Terrytown, N.Y.Google Scholar
  6. Sittampalam, G., and Wilson, G. S., 1984. Experimental Observations of Transient Light Scattering Complexes Formed During Immunoprecipitin Reactions, Anal. Chem. 56: 2170–76.Google Scholar
  7. Sternberg, J. C., 1977. A Rate Nephelometer for Measuring Specific Proteins by Immunoprecipitin Reactions. Clin. Chem. 23: 1456–64.Google Scholar
  8. Sternberg, J. C., 1986. Rate Nephelometry, in “Manual of Clinical Laboratory Immunology” Rose, N. R. Freidman, H., and Fahey, J. L., eds., American Society for Microbiology, 33-39.Google Scholar
  9. Tiffany, T. Q., Parella, J. M., Johnson, W. F. and Burtis, C. A. 1974 Specific Protein Analysis by Light Scatter Measurement with Miniature Centrifugal Fast Analyzer. Clin. Chem., 20: 1055.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Valentine, R. C., and Green, N. M., 1967. Electron Microscopy of an Antibody-Hapten Complex. J. of. Molec. Biol. 27 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chan S. Oh
    • 1
  • James C. Sternberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Research Department, Diagnostic Systems GroupBeckman Instruments, Inc.BreaUSA

Personalised recommendations