Variability in Anthropometric Traits in Twins and Their Families

  • Linda A. Corey
  • Lindon J. Eaves
  • Walter E. Nance
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 43)


Studies of twins and their families can provide important insight into the nature of the factors responsible for observed phenotypic variation in anthropometric traits as well as for differences in risk for multifactorial disorders. Classical twin studies afford an incisive means for determining whether or not genetic factors contribute to observed differences in the occurrence of a trait or disorder. The kinships of twins are particularly valuable for differentiating between genetic, environmental and maternal effects and the causes of sex differences in gene expression because of the unusually large number of informative genetic and environmental relationships that are contained within each extended pedigree. This approach is especially productive when dealing with traits, such as blood pressure, which could be influenced by a number of different factors. While there has been general agreement that genetic differences are responsible for at least some of the observed variation in normal blood pressure, there is less consensus as to the relative magnitude of this effect. Thus in different studies genetic factors have been both implicated in (Moll et al., 1983; Morton et al., 1980; Annest et al., 1979; Ewell et al., 1978), and absolved of (Iselius et al., 1983; Harburg et al., 1977; Chakraborty et al., 1977) being the primary causal determinant of variation in blood pressure.


Diastolic Blood Pressure Maternal Effect Dominance Effect Additive Genetic Effect Family Resemblance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Annest, J. L., Sing, C. F., Biron, P., and Mongeau, J. G., 1979, Familial aggregation of blood pressure and weight in families. II. Estimation of the relative contributions of genetic and common environmental factors to blood pressure correlations between family members, Am. J. Epidemiol., 110:492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chakraborty, R., Schull, W. J., Harburg, E., Schork, M. A., and Roeper, P., 1977, Heredity, stress and blood pressure, a family set method. V. Heritability estimates, J. Chron. Dis., 30:683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christian, J. C., and Kang, K. W., 1977, Maternal influence on plasma cholesterol variation, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 20:462.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, P. F., and Polonsky, I., 1965, Numerical interpolation, differientia-tion and integration. in: “Handbook of Mathematical Functions,” M. Abramowitz, and I. A. Stegan, eds., Dover Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Eaves, L. J., 1977, Inferring the causes of human variation, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A, 140:324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eaves, L. J., and Last, K. A., 1980, Assessing empathy in twins through their mutual perception of social attitudes, J. Pers. Ind. Diff., 1:174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eaves, L. J., 1982, Utility of twins. in: “Genetic Basis of Epilepsies,” V. E. Anderson, W. A. Hauser, J. K. Penry, and C. F. Sing, eds., Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Ewell, L. W., Nance, W. E., Corey, L. A., Boughman, J. A., and Winter, P. M., 1978, Blood pressure studies on monozygotic twins and their families. in “Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, Vol. 24C”, W. E. Nance, G. Allen, and P. Parisi, eds., Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  9. Haley, C. S., Jinks, J. L., and Last, K. A., 1981, The monozygotic twin half-sib method for analysing maternal effects and sex linkage in humans, Heredity, 46:227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harburg, E., Erfurt, J. C., Schull, W. J., Schork, M. A., and Colman, R., 1977, Heredity, stress and blood pressure, a family set method. I. Study aims and sample flow, J. Chron. Dis., 30:625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Havlik, R. J., Garrison, R. J., Feinleib, M., Kannel, W. B., Castelli, W. P., and McNamara, P. M., 1979, Blood pressure aggregation in families, Am. J. Epidemiol., 110:304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Iselius, L., Morton, N. E., and Rao, D. C., 1983, Family resemblance for blood pressure, Hum. Hered., 33:277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lange, K. L., Westlake, J., and Spence, M. A., 1976, Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method, Ann. Hum. Genet., 39:485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mather, K., Jinks, J. L., 1982, “Biometrical Genetics”, 3rd Edition, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  15. Moll, P. P., Harburg, E., Burns, T. L., Schork, M. A., and Ozgoren, F., 1983, Heredity, stress and blood pressure, a family set approach: the Detroit Project revisited, J. Chron. Dis., 36:317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morton, N. E., Gulbrandsen, C. L., Rao, D. C., Rhoads, G. G., and Kagan, A., 1980, Determinants of blood pressure in Japanese-American families, Hum. Genet., 53:261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nance, W. E., and Corey, L. A., 1976, Genetic models for the analysis of data from families of identical twins, Genetics, 83:811.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Numerical Algorithms Group, 1982, “NAG Library,” Numerical Algorithms Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Rose, R. J., Miller, J. Z., Grim, C. E., and Christian, J. C., 1979, Aggregation of blood pressure in the families of identical twins, Am. J. Epidemiol., 109:503.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda A. Corey
    • 1
  • Lindon J. Eaves
    • 1
  • Walter E. Nance
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical College of VirginiaVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations