Advertisement

Phenotypic Variation within Genetically Homogeneous Populations: Responsiveness to Toxicants

  • George L. Wolff
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 43)

Abstract

Phenotypic variation in mammalian populations reflects not only genetic variability due to allelic and chromosomal differences but also the expressivity of genotypes. Expressivity is defined as the range of phenotypes expressed by a given genotype under any given set of environmental conditions or over a range of environmental conditions.1 This type of phenotypic variation and its possible physiological and molecular bases are the subject of this discussion. The strain-associated susceptibility to tissue-specific lesions, which also is reflected in the responsiveness to toxic insults, is an example of this type of variation. It is of practical relevance to risk assessment if only because sample sizes and dose levels in subchronic and chronic toxicity assays depend on the relative responsiveness of the inbred or F-1 hybrid test animal population used. This type of phenotypic variation is present in genetically heterogeneous populations but there it is inextricably confounded with the variation due to genetic differences. Therefore, its molecular and physiological components can only be defined in genetically homogeneous populations, e.g., inbred strains or their F-l hybrids. Once defined, however, they can be incorporated in the design of studies using genetically heterogeneous test animal populations.

Keywords

Background Genome Hepatocellular Adenoma Hybrid Mouse Toxic Insult Glandular Hyperplasia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. King and W.D. Stansfield, “A Dictionary of Genetics,” Oxford University Press, New York (1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.L. Wolff, Some genetic considerations for the design of better mammalian assay systems for the detection of chemical mutagens and carcinogens. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol., 1:79 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.P. Hummel, B.L. Coleman, and P.W. Lane, The influence of genetic background on expression of mutations at the diabetes locus in the mouse. I. C5 7BL/KsJ and C5 7BL/6J strains, Biochem. Genetics, 7:1 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.L. Coleman and K.P. Hummel, The influence of genetic background on the expression of the obese (ob) gene in the mouse, Diabetologia, 9:287 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G.L. Wolff, D.W. Roberts, and D.B. Galbraith, Prenatal determination of adult obesity, tumor susceptibility, and coat color pattern in viable yellow A vy /a mice: the yellow mouse syndrome, J. Hered., 77:151 (1986).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.W. Roberts, G.L. Wolff, and W.L. Campbell, Differential effects of the mottled yellow and pseudoagouti phenotypes on immunocompetence in A vy/a mice, Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 81:2152 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.B. Galbraith and G.L. Wolff, Aberrant regulation of the agouti pigment pattern in the viable yellow (A vy/a) mouse. J. Hered., 65:137 (1974).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.L. Greenman and R.R. Delongchamp, Interactive responses to diethylstilbestrol in C3Hmice, Fd. Chem. Toxicol., 24:931 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.L. Wolff, R.L. Morrissey, and J.J. Chen, Susceptible and resistant subgroups in genetically identical populations: response of mouse liver neoplasia and body weight to phenobarbital, Carcinogenesis, 7:1935 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.L. Wolff, R.L. Morrissey, and J.J. Chen, Amplified response to phénobarbital promotion of hepatotumorigenesis in obese yellow AVy/A (C3H x VY) F-l hybrid mice, Carcinogenesis, 7:1895 (1986).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G.L. Wolff, Influence of maternal phenotype on metabolic differentiation of agouti locus mutants in the mouse, Genetics, 88:529 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.W. Poole, Dermal-epidermal interactions and the action of alleles at the agouti locus in the mouse. II. The viable yellow (A) and mottled agouti (am) alleles. Dev. Biol., 80:495 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.L. Wolff and R.L. Morrissey, Increased responsiveness of lean pseudoagouti A vy /a female mice to lindane enhancement of lung and liver tumorigenesis, Proc. Am. Assn. Cancer. Res., 27:138 (1986).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • George L. Wolff
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Comparative Toxicology National Center for Toxicological Research Food and Drug AdministrationDepartment of Health and Human ServicesJeffersonUSA

Personalised recommendations