The Arrogance of Intellectual Power

  • Sheldon W. Samuels
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 43)


Little more than a week ago, in Bologna, I attended the annual conference of Collegium Ramazzini. The highlight of the meeting is the Ramazzini Lecture, this year presented by Arthur Upton, formerly of this laboratory.


Acceptable Risk Lower Tier Intellectual Power Population Thinking Clear Thinking 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    E. Mayr, “The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance,” Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1982).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Wright, Genes as physiological agents: General considerations, Am. Naturalist, 79:289 (1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Nelson, A personal view of occupational cancer and its prevention, J. Epid and Comm. Hlth., 39:1 (1981).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. J. Fox, P. O. Goldblatt, and D. R. Jones, Social class mortality differentials, J. Epid. and Comm. Hlth. 39:1 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. J. Brightman, A. Rihm, and S. W. Samuels, Air pollution and health, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., 12:225 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. W. Samuels, and R. H. Adamson, Quantitative risk assessment, J. Natl. Cancer Instit., 74:945 (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Gewirth, Human rights and the workplace, in: “The Environment of the Workplace and Human Values,” S. W. Samuels, ed., Alan R. Liss, New York, (1986).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheldon W. Samuels
    • 1
  1. 1.Health, Safety and Environment, Industrial Union DepartmentAFL-CIOWashington, D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations