Assessment of Flushing Flow Recommendations in a Steep, Rough, Regulated Tributary

  • T. A. Wesche
  • V. R. Hasfurther
  • W. A. Hubert
  • Q. D. Skinner


Alteration of stream flow regime and sediment loading from water development activities can result in both short- and long-term changes in channel morphology and conveyance capacity. Subsequently, the condition of the aquatic habitat can be affected. In recent years, much research and development effort has been directed toward the determination of suitable instream flows to maintain fisheries habitat in regulated streams (Stalnaker & Arnette 1976; Wesche & Rechard 1980). However, there are several facets of the instream flow problem which have not been adequately investigated, one involving the recommendation of flushing flows to simulate the peak runoff hydrograph characteristics of most unregulated streams (Reiser et al. 1985).


Study Reach Bedload Transport Spring Runoff Runoff Hydrograph North Fork 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banner Associates, Inc. 1976. Report on proposed expansion of Cheyenne’s Little Snake Diversion Facilities. First section of the general report and reconnaissance report on Hog Park Reservoir enlargement. Prepared for the City of Cheyenne, Wyoming, Board of Public utilities.Google Scholar
  2. Binns, N. A. 1977. Present status of indigenous populations of cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki), in southwest Wyoming. Fisheries Technical Bull. No. 2, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, T. J. and Somers, W. P. 1969. Discharge measurements at gaging stations. Book 3, Chapter A8 of Techniques of Water Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Environmental Research & Technology, Inc. 1980. Flushing flow discharge evaluation for 18 streams in the Medicine Bow National Forest. Report prepared for the City of Cheyenne, Wyoming, Board of Public Utilities.Google Scholar
  5. Eustis, A. B. and Hillen, R. H. 1954. Stream sediment removal by controlled reservoir releases. Prog.-Fish Cult., 16(1): 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lotspeich, F. B. and Everest, F. H. 1981. A new method for reporting and interpreting textural composition of spawning gravel. Research Note PNW-369; Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
  7. McNeil, W. J. and Ahnell, W. H. 1964. Success of pink salmon spawning relative to size of spawning bed materials. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report — Fish No. 469. 15 p.Google Scholar
  8. Platts, W. S., Megahan, W. F. and Minshall, G. W. 1983. Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-138, Intermountain Forest and Range Experimentation Station, Ogden, Utah.Google Scholar
  9. Reiser, D. W., Ramey, M. P. and Lambert, T. R. 1985. Review of flushing flow requirements in regulated streams. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., San Ramon, California. 97 pp. + App.Google Scholar
  10. Reiser, D. W. and Wesche, T. A. 1977. Determination of physical and hydraulic preferences of brown and brook trout in the selection of spawning locations. Water Resources Series No. 64. Water Resources Research Institute, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming.Google Scholar
  11. Rosgen, D. 1982. A procedure and rationale for securing favorable conditions of water flows on national forest system lands in northern Wyoming. Draft manuscript. Region 2, U.S. Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
  12. Stalnaker, C. B. and Arnette, J. L. (Eds.) 1976. Methodologies for the determination of stream resource flow requirements: An assessment. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Western Water Allocation, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  13. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1981. Final environmental impact statement on Cheyenne Stage II water diversion proposal. Rocky Mt. Region, Lakewood, Colorado. 235 pp. + App.Google Scholar
  14. Wesche, T. A. and Rechard, P. A. 1980. A summary of instream flow methods for fisheries and related research needs. Eisenhower consortium bulletin No. 9. U.S. Government Printing Office: 1980-0-679-417/509, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Wesche, T. A., Reiser, D. W., Wichers, W. and Wichers, D. 1977. Fishery resources and instream flow recommendations for streams to be impacted by Cheyenne’s proposed Phase II development. Report to Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. A. Wesche
    • 1
  • V. R. Hasfurther
    • 1
  • W. A. Hubert
    • 2
  • Q. D. Skinner
    • 3
  1. 1.Wyoming Water Research CenterUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Department of Zoology and PhysiologyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  3. 3.Range Management DivisionUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations