Advertisement

Tradeoffs Between Stream Regulation and Point Source Treatments in Cost-Effective Water Quality Management

  • Gary E. Hauser
  • Richard J. Ruane

Abstract

In some heavily developed areas, treatment of municipal and industrial wastewaters to desired effluent standards still does not allow stream water quality criteria to be met. If the water resource in these areas is developed with upstream reservoirs capable of streamflow regulation, a number of management alternatives may be available in addition to more stringent controls on point source waste discharges. This paper addresses the significant role that unsteady water quality models can play in evaluating tradeoffs between improvement strategies involving stream flow regulation and point sources effluent control.

Keywords

Improvement Strategy Water Quality Model Waste Load South Fork North Fork 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ford, D. E., Thornton, K. W., Lessem, A. S., Wlosinki, J. H. and Norton, J. L. 1981. “CE-QUAL-R1: A Numerical One-Dimensional Model of Reservoir Water Quality — User’s Manual”, Environmental Laboratory, USAE Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.Google Scholar
  2. Gulliver, J. S. and Stefan, H. G. 1984. Stream Productivity Analysis with DORM-II, Parameter Estimation and Sensitivity. Water Research, 18 (12). New York, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Hauser, G. E. and Ruane, R. J. 1985. Model Exploration of Holston River Water Quality Improvement Strategies. Report No. WR28-1-590-109, TVA Water Systems Development and Water Quality Branches, Norris, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  4. Industrial Economics, Inc. 1984a. Case Studies on the Trading of Effluent Loads — Dillon Reservoir. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. IEC Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. Industrial Economics, Inc. 1984b. Exploratory Study of Improving Dissolved Oxygen Concentrations in the Holston River Near Kingsport, Tennessee. Prepared for Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  6. Jobson, H. E. 1980. Temperature and Solute Transport Simulation in Streamflow Using a Lagrangian Reference Frame. USGS Water Resources Investigations 81-2, National Space Technical Laboratories, NSTL Station, Mississippi.Google Scholar
  7. Raschke, R. L., Hall, S., Cavinder, T., Koenig, M., Frey, P., Howard, H., Shultz, D., Hicks, D., Murphy, P. and Barnwell, T. 1978. Holston River Study. EPA 904/9-78-019, EPA Surveillance and Analysis Division, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary E. Hauser
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard J. Ruane
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Water Systems Development BranchTennessee Valley AuthorityNorrisUSA
  2. 2.Water Quality BranchTennessee Valley AuthorityChattanoogaUSA

Personalised recommendations