Effect of Cavities on Ultrasonic Attenuation and Velocity

  • Anmol S. Birring
  • J. J. Hanley


Cavitation, voids, or porosity in materials can initiate several types of failure mechanisms. One type is creep, which begins with cavitation and eventually leads to microcracking, cracking, crack coalescing, and ultimate failure. Failure from creep can be avoided if cavitation is detected early.

A theoretical investigation of nondestructive ultrasonic methods for detection of creep cavitation in steels was performed. Ultrasonic scattering theories available in the literature were converted into computer software and used to predict the effect of cavities on ultrasonic attenuation and velocity. From the results, we theoretically concluded that measurements of (1) absolute velocity and (2) velocity and attenuation variation with frequency have a strong potential to detect cavitation.

The study also looked at the effects of scattering from grain boundaries and from graphite and carbide inclusions in steels. Grain scattering affects attenuation and velocity, and methods were formulated to compensate for such effects. The scattering from inclusions is expected to be less than that from cavities, as cavities produce a higher impedance mismatch than inclusions. The study concludes that ultrasonic methods will be able to detect creep cavitation in carbon steels used for high-temperature applications.


Ultrasonic Wave Ultrasonic Velocity Cavity Size Ultrasonic Attenuation Impedance Mismatch 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. J. Cane, P. R. McCarty, and P. F. Aplin, Residual Life Assessment Methods, Progress Report on EPRI RP-2253–4, Palo Alto, CA, June (1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Truell, C. Elbaum, and B. B. Chick, in: “Ultrasonic Methods in Solid State Physics,” Academic Press, New York, (1969).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. M. Sayers and R. L. Smith, The Propagation of Ultrasound in Porous Media, Ultrasonics, 20:201–205 (September 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.M. Sayers, Ultrasonic Velocity Dispension in Porous Materials, Journal of Applied Physics, 14:413–420 (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.M. Sayers, Scattering of Ultrasound by Minority Phases in Poly-crystalline Metals, U.K. Atomic Energy Authority Final Report, AERE-R-11162 (January 1984).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Hirsekorn, The Scattering of Ultrasonic Waves by Polycrystals, Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 72:1021–1031 (September 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. P. Papadakis, The Inverse Problem in Material Characterization Through Ultrasonic Attenuation and Velocity Measurements, in: “Nondestructive Methods for Material Property Determination,” C. O. Ruud and R. E. Greed, eds., Plenum Press, New York (1984), pp. 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Goebbels, Structure Analysis by Scattered Ultrasound, in: “Research Techniques in Nondestructive Testing,” Vol. 4, R. S. Sharpe, ed., Academic Press, London, (1986).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anmol S. Birring
    • 1
  • J. J. Hanley
    • 1
  1. 1.Nondestructive Evaluation Science and Technology DivisionSouthwest Research InstituteSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations