A View of the Need and Technologies for in-Process Materials Property Evaluation

  • Clay Olaf Rudd
  • Chandra Vikram


The productivity of industry from basic production of raw metallic shapes through fabrication of components and manufacture of multi-component structures would be greatly enhanced by constant and thorough interrogation of the relevant properties of the material. However, even though great strides have been made in interrogation technologies, for example, nondestructive detection of cracks and voids in components, sparse practical progress has been made in nondestructive interrogation for material property measurement. Advancements in this field will be of great benefit, but the lack of broadly multi-disciplinary and multi-technique research has been lacking. Further, the need and possibilities of success of broader approaches seem ripe for exploitation. This paper is concerned with the need and application of techniques for nondestructive, in-process measurement of metallic properties. The investigation has reviewed a broad spectrum of interrogating energies, means to apply them, the effect of the energy on the propagating media (metallic component), and the effect of various types of metallic media on the propagating energy. Several systems consisting of a combination of technologies have been identified as promising and one concept of teamed techniques will be described.


Feed Stock Acoustic Planar Wave Nondestructive Detection Nondestructive Characterization Stainless Steel Strip 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    AMS, Metals Handbook, Vol. 2, 9th Ed., p. 258, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Papadakis, E.P., “The Inverse Problem in Materials Characterization through Ultrasonic Attenuation and Velocity Measurements,” Nondestructive Methods for Material Property Determination, C.O. Ruud and R.E. Green, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mignogna, R.B., A.V. Clark, B.R. Rath, and C.L. Vold, “Effects of Rolled Plate Thickness on Anisotropy with Application to Acoustic Stress Measurement,” Nondestructive Methods for Material Property Determination, C.O. Ruud and R.E. Green, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ledbetter, H.M., N.J. Frederick, and M.W. Austin, “Elastic Constant Variability in Stainless-Steel 304,” J. Appl. Phy. 51, 305–309, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ruud, C.O. and R.E. Green, Eds., Nondestructive Methods for Material Property Determination, Plenum Press, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ruud, C.O. and C. Vikram, “Morphological Investigation of Fundamental Methods for In-Process Materials Evaluation for Productivity Improvement,” Proceeding of the 12th Conf. on Prod. R. and D., Nat. Science Foundation, Pub. by Soc. of Manf. Engr., 1 SME Dr., Dearborn, MI, pp. 345–352, May 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCauley, J.M., “The Role of Characterization in Emerging High Performance Ceramic Materials,” AMMRL TR 84–49, Army Mat. and Mech. Res. Cntr., Watertown, MA, Dec. 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clay Olaf Rudd
    • 1
  • Chandra Vikram
    • 1
  1. 1.The Material Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations