Solubilization of the Fusicoccin Receptor and a Protein Kinase from Highly Purified Plasma Membrane from Oat Roots
Part of the
NATO ASI Series
book series (NSSA, volume 133)
Fusicoccin (FC), a diterpine glucoside Phytotoxin, that stimulates electrogenic H+ extrusion in higher plants binds specifically to a plant plasma membrane (PM) protein. A highly purified preparation of plasma membrane vesicles has been prepared from oat roots and used to study the FC-binding protein (receptor). In these right-side out vesicles the FC-binding site is protected from trypsin degradation, but disruption of the vesicle integrity with Triton X-100 or solubilization of the receptor renders it susceptible to trypsin degradation. The receptor has been successfully solubilized with octyl-glucoside (90% recovery) and can be assayed effectively by binding to glass-fiber filters coated with 1% polyethylinimine.
A Mg2+-dependent Ca2+-activated protein-kinase was solubilized from the PM vesicles through sonication. This shows that the kinase is a peripheral membrane protein. The soluble kinase has a sharp pH optimum at pH 7.
The enzyme that is thought to be activated by FC, the plasma membrane ATPase, was present in the PM vesicles with a very high specific activity (4 – 5 µmol/mg protein, min). We show evidence that the detergent activition of this enzyme is not simply due to breaking the vesicle integrity. A conformational change or removal of a regulatory subunit may cause stimulation of the H -ATPase and this may be of importance in our study of the mode of action of fusicoccin.
KeywordsElectron Spin Resonance ATPase Activity Electron Spin Resonance Measurement Peripheral Membrane Protein Plasma Membrane ATPase
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
E. Marre, Fusicoccin: a tool in plant physiology, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol
. 30: 273 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Aducci, R. Federico and A. Ballio, Interaction of a high molecular weight deriva te of fusicoccin with plant membranes, Phytoph. Medit.
19: 187 (1980).Google Scholar
P. Aducci, M. Coletta and M. Marre, An improved Scatchard analysis of fusicoccin-binding to maize coleoptile membranes. Plant Sci. Lett.
33: 187 (1984bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
T. Hunter and J.A. Cooper, Protein-tyrosine kinases, Ann. Rev. Biochem.
54: 897 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
L. Tognoli and R. Colombo, Protein phosphorylation in intact cultured sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus
) cells and its response to fusicoccin, Biochem. J.
235: 45 (1986).PubMedGoogle Scholar
A. Berti and H. Felle, Cytoplasmic pH of root hair cells of Sinapisalba
recorded by a pH-sensitive micro-electrode. Does fusicoccin stimulate the proton pump by cytoplasmic acidification ?, J. Exp. Bot.
36: 1142 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R.J. Reid, L.D. Field and M.G. Pitman, Effects of external pH, fusicoccin and butyrate on the cytoplasmic pH in barley root tips measured by P-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Planta
166: 341 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Pesci, S.M. Cocucci and G. Randazzo, Characterization of fusicoccin binding to receptor sites on cell membranes of maize coleoptile tis-sues, Plant Cell finv
. 2: 205 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Aducci, A. Ballio, L. Fiorucci and E. Simonetti, Inactivation of solubilized fusicoccin-binding sites by endogenous plant hydrolases, Planta
160: 422 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R.G. Stout and R.E. Cleland, Partial characterization of fusicoccin binding to receptor sites on oat root membranes. Plant Physiol.
66: 353 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Aducci, G. Crosetti, R. Federico and A. Ballio, Fusicoccin receptors. Evidence for endogenous ligand, Planta
148: 208 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K.D. Brown, P. Dicker and E. Rozengurt, Inhibition of epidermal growth factor binding to surface receptors by tumor promotors, Bioch. Bio-phys. Res. Comm.
86: 1037 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L.M.F. Leeb-Lundberg, S. Cotecchia, J.W. Lomasney, J.F. DeBernardis, R.J. Lefkowitz and M.G. Caron, Phorbol esters promote α1
--adrenergic receptor phosphorylation and receptor uncoupling from inositol phospholipid metabolism, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
82: 5651 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
C.H. Larsson, Plasma membranes, in: “New Series Vol. 1: Cell Components, p 85”, H.F. Linskens and J.F. Jackson, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
T.L. Lomax and R.J. Mehlhorn, Determination of osmotic volumes and pH gradients of plant membrane and lipid vesicles using ESR spectroscopy, Biochim.Biophys.Acta.
821: 106 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
M.M. Bradford, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye-binding, Anal. Biochem.
72: 248 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
H.R. Lötscher, C. De Jong and R.A. Capaldi, Interconversion of high and low adenosine tri-phosphatase activity forms of Escherichia coli
by the lauryldimethylamine oxide, Biochem.
23: 4140 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D.P. Blowers, A. Hetherington and A. Trewavas, Isolation of plasma-membrane-bound calcium/calmodulin-regulated protein kinase from pea using Western blotting, Planta
166: 208 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A.M. Hetherington and A. Trewavas, Activation of a pea membrane protein kinase by calcium ions, Planta
161: 409 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
B. Forbusch III, Characterization of right-side out membrane vesicles rich in (Na, K)-ATPase and isolated from dog kidney outer medulla, J. Biol. Chem.
257: 12768 (1982).Google Scholar
CS. King and J.A. Cooper, Effects of protein kinase C activation after epidermal growth factor binding on epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation, J. Biol. Chem.
261: 10073 (1986).PubMedGoogle Scholar
© Plenum Press, New York 1987