Advertisement

Interaction of Trophoblastic Vesicles with Bovine Embryos Developing in Vitro

  • Yves Heyman
  • Yves Ménézo

Abstract

In many species, in vitro culture of fertilized embryos does not lead to normal cleavage and development as observed in vivo. When cultured in vitro, mouse eggs from outbred strains are blocked at the 2-cell stage unless they are transferred back into oviducts (Whittingham and Biggers, 1967). Hamster eggs also become blocked at this stage (Whittingham and Bavister, 1974) [see also Chapter 11 (Ed.)]. Most early bovine embryos (1- to 8-cell stage) arrest their development in vitro at the 8- to 12-cell stage (Thibault, 1966), in spite of a variety of culture media and conditions tested by several authors (reviewed by Wright and Bondioli, 1981).

Keywords

Corpus Luteum Coculture System Internal Fluid Bovine Embryo Morula Stage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, R.L., and Wright, R.W., 1984, In vitro development of porcine embryos in coculture with endometrial cell monolayers or culture supernatants, J. Anim. Sci. 59: 1657–1661.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Betteridge, K.J., Eaglesome, M.D., Randall, G.C.B., and Mitchell, D., 1980, Collection, description and transfer of embryos from cattle 10-16 days after oestrus, J. Reprod. Fertil. 59: 205–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boland, M., 1984, Use of the rabbit oviduct as a screening tool for the viability of mammalian eggs, Theriogenology 21: 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buznikov, G.A., Sakharova, A.V., Manukhin, B.N., and Markova, L.N., 1972, The role of neurohumours in early embryogenesis. IV. fluorimetric and histochemical study of serotonin in cleaving eggs and larvae of sea urchins, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 27: 339–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Camous, S., Heyman, Y., and Ménézo, Y., 1984, In vitro cleavage of cow embryos and further survival assessment in vivo, Proceedings 10th Int. Congress on Anim. Reprod. and Artificial Insemination, Urbana, Vol. II, brief communication no. 221.Google Scholar
  6. Camous, S., Heyman, Y., Meziou, W., and Ménézo, Y., 1984, Cleavage beyond the block stage and survival after transfer of early bovine embryos cultured with trophoblastic vesicles, J. Reprod. Fertil. 72: 479–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, D.L., and Day, B.N., 1978, Cleavage and blastocyst formation by pig eggs in vitro, J. Anim. Sci. 46: 1042–1053.Google Scholar
  8. Glass, L.E., and Hanson, J.E., 1975, Transfer and localisation of maternal serum antigens by mouse preimplantation embryos and oviductal epithelium, Differentiation 4: 15–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heyman, Y., Camous, S., Fèvre, J., Meziou, W., and Martal, J., 1984, Maintenance of the corpus luteum after uterine transfer of trophoblastic vesicles to cyclic cows and sheep, J. Reprod. Fertil. 70: 533–540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hobbs, J.G., and Kaye, P.L., 1985, Glycine transport in mouse eggs and preimplantation embryos, J. Reprod. Fertil. 74: 77–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ilgreen, E.B., 1981, On the control of trophoblastic giant-cell transformation in the mouse: homotypic cellular interactions and polyploidy, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 62: 183–202.Google Scholar
  12. Kane, M.T., 1985, A low molecular weight extract of bovine serum albumin stimulates rabbit blastocyst cell division and expansion in vitro, J. Reprod. Fertil. 73: 147–150.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuzan, F., and Wright, R., 1982, Observations on the development of bovine morulae on various cellular and non-cellular substrata, J. Anim. Sci. 54: 811–816.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindner, G.M., and Wright, R.W., Jr., 1983, Bovine embryo morphology and evaluation, Theriogenology 20: 407–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martal, J., Camous, S., Fèvre, J., Charlier, M., and Heyman, Y., 1984, Specificity of embryonic signals maintaining corpus luteum in early pregnancy in ruminants, Proceedings 10th Int. Congress on Anim. Reprod. and Artificial Insemination, Urbana, Vol. III, brief communication no. 510.Google Scholar
  16. Ménézo, Y., 1976, Milieu synthétique pour la survie et la maturation des gamètes et pour la culture de l’oeuf fécondé, C.R. Acad. Sci. D Paris 282: 1967–1970.Google Scholar
  17. Ménézo, Y., Renard, J.P., Delobel, B., and Pageaux, J.F., 1982, Kinetic study of fatty acid composition of Day 7 to Day 14 cow embryos, Biol. Reprod. 26: 787–790.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ménézo, Y., Testard, J., Perrone, D., 1984, Serum is not necessary in human in vitro fertilization, early embryo culture, and transfer, Fertil. Steril. 42: 750–755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller, J.G.O., and Schultz, G.A., 1983, Properties of amino-acid transport in rabbit preimplantation embryos, J. Exp. Zool. 228: 511–525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muggleton-Harris, A., Whittingham, D.G., and Wilson, L., 1982, Cytoplasmic control of preimplantation development in vitro in the mouse, Nature (London) 299: 460–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Northey, D.L., and French, L.R., 1980, Effect of embryo removal and intrauterine infusion of embryonic homogenates on the lifespan of the bovine corpus luteum, J. Reprod. Fertil. 12: 539–550.Google Scholar
  22. Plante, C., Bousquet, D., Guay, P., Goff, A.K., and King., W.A., 1985, Luteotrophic factor secreted by bovine embryonic tissue, Theriogenology 23: 217 (abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Renard, J.P., du Mesnil du Buisson, F., Wintenberger-Torrès, S., and Ménézo, Y., 1976, In vitro culture of cow embryos from Day 6 and Day 7, in: Egg Transfer in Cattle (L.E.A. Rowson, ed.), Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp. 159–164.Google Scholar
  24. Seidel, G.E., Jr., 1977, Short maintenance and culture of embryos, in: Embryo Transfer in Farm Animals: A Review of Techniques and Applications (K.J. Betteridge, ed.), Canada Dept. of Agriculture, Monograph 16, pp 20-24.Google Scholar
  25. Soto, A.M., and Sonnenschein, C., 1984, Mechanism of estrogen action on cellular proliferation: evidence for indirect and negative control on cloned breast tumor cells, Biophys. Biochem. Res. Commun. 122: 1097–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soto, A.M., and Sonnenschein, C., 1985, The role of estrogens on the proliferation of human breast tumor cells (MCF7), J. Steroid Biochem. 23: 87–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tervit, H.R., Whittingham, D.G., and Rowson, L.E.A., 1972, Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova, J. Reprod. Fertil. 30: 493–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thatcher, W., Knickerbocker, J., Bartol, F., Bazer, F., Roberts, M., and Drost, M., 1985, Maternal recognition of pregnancy in relation to the survival of transferred embryos: Endocrine aspects, Theriogenology 23: 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thibault, C., 1966, La culture in vitro de l’oeuf de vache, Ann. Biol. Anim. Bioch. Biophys. 6: 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Villalon, M., Ortiz, M.E., Aguayo, C., Munoz, J., and Croxatto, H.B., 1982, Differential transport of fertilized and unfertilized ova in the rat, Biol. Reprod. 26: 337–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Whittingham, D.G., and Bavister, B.D., 1974, Development of hamster eggs fertilized in vitro or in vivo, J. Reprod. Fertil. 38: 489–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Whittingham, D.G., and Biggers, J.D., 1967, Fallopian tube and early cleavage in the mouse, Nature (London) 213: 942–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wright, R.W., Jr., and Bondioli, K.R., 1981, Aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo culture in domestic animals, J. Anim. Sci. 53: 702–729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wright, R.W., Anderson, G.B., Cupps, P.T., and Drost, M., 1976, Blastocyst expansion and hatching of bovine ova cultured in vitro, J. Anim. Sci. 43: 170–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yves Heyman
    • 1
  • Yves Ménézo
    • 2
  1. 1.Station de Physiologie AnimaleI.N.R.A.Jouy-en-JosasFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire de BiologieI.N.S.A.Villeurbanne CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations