Skip to main content

Multiple Time Measures are Necessary to Reduce Uncertainty in Dose-Response Modeling: Time- and Dose-Mechanisms of the ED01 Study

  • Chapter
Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 4))

Abstract

Prompt cellular proliferation, resulting from toxic hyperplasia and/or normal tissue homeostasis, is required to complete carcinogenic initiation processes. Also, cell proliferation is required for carcinogenic potentiation. We have developed a mathematical model for tumorigenesis incorporating four dimensions: (1) dose, (2) exposure time, (3) sacrifice time, and (4) response. The model is based on the mechanism of compensatory cell proliferation. The fit was tested against data for tumors observed in 24, 192 BALB/C mice fed 2-AAF at concentrations of 0, 35, 45, 60, 75, 100, and 150 ppm to time-of-sacrifice at 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 24, and 33 months at the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR). Because this study was designed to measure a dose of 2-AAF needed to induce a 1% tumor rate, it has become commonly known as the ED01 study. The coefficients of the mathematical model were determined from the ED01 data and the model was then used to predict the time- and dose-development of tumors in a second NCTR study of mice fed 2-AAF at concentrations of 60, 75, 100, and 150 ppm for 9, 12, and 15 months, and then sacrificed at 18 and 24 months. Previous dose-response models have not described the ED01 study adequately. In contrast, this four-dimensional analysis fits the dose-response quite adequately (when timeon-feed is the same as time-to-sacrifice) and is also totally predictive (without any redetermination of numerical coefficients) for the feed-waitsacrifice protocol.

Research sponsored by the Office of Health and Environmental Research, U.S. Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC05-84 OR21400 with Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cohen, S.M., Muraski, G., Fukushima, S., and Greenfield, R.E. (1982), Cancer Res. 42, 65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Druckrey, H. 1967, UICC Monograph Series, Vol 7 Rene Truhaut, Ed., 60. Farber, E., 1980, In Toxic Injury of the Liver, Farber, E., Fisher, M., eds., New York: M. Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, D.G., Kaplan, N.L., Anderson, M.W., 1983. Science 219, 1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.D., 1984, “A Unifying Concept for Carcinogenic Risk Assessment: Comparison with Radiation-Induce Leukemia in Mice and Men” Health Physics 47 (4), 533–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.D., Griffin, G.D., Walsh, P.J., 1983, J. Theor, Biology 105, 35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Littlefield, N.A., Farmer, J.H., Gaylor, D.W., 1980, J. of Envir. Pathology and Toxicology, 3, 17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oyasu, R., Hirao, Y., Izumi, K., 1981, Cancer Res. 41, 478.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, R.G., Henneberry, M.O., Oyasu, R., Grayhack, J.T., 1980, Cancer Res. 40, 4524.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, W.L., Hunsicker, P.R., Raymer, G.D., Steele, M.H., Stelzner, K.F., Thompson, H.M., 1982, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 3589.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Society of Toxicology (SOT), ED Task Force, 1981, Fundamentals of Applied Toxicology, 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, T.D., Dudney, C.S., Walsh, P.J. (1987). Multiple Time Measures are Necessary to Reduce Uncertainty in Dose-Response Modeling: Time- and Dose-Mechanisms of the ED01 Study. In: Covello, V.T., Lave, L.B., Moghissi, A., Uppuluri, V.R.R. (eds) Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5319-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5317-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics