The Intracellular Distribution of Adenosine Triphosphate

  • Samuel B. Horowitz
  • David S. Miller
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 127)


Eukaryotic cells are not internally homogeneous, but are compartmentalized into cytoplasmic and nuclear ground substances and the numerous organelles embedded therein. Because of spatial heterogeneity, a comprehensive understanding of the cell's metabolism requires not only data on the rates of synthesis and utilization of adenosine triphosphate, but also a description of how ATP is distributed. Unfortunately, it is difficult to measure ATP concentrations regionally within cells, so that very little is known about its distribution. When considering its role in specific metabolic pathways, it is usual to accept ATP concentrations averaged over the entire cell (or tissue) volume as an adequate measure of local concentrations. This is equivalent to assuming that intracellular ATP is uniformly distributed. (Mitochondria, thought to have much lower ATP levels than the surrounding cytoplasm, are usually exempted from this assumption.) With the development of cryomicrodissection (Frank and Horowitz, 1978; Tluczek et al., 1984), it is now possible to measure ATP in regions of a single cell, the amphibian oocyte. We are beginning to develop some notion as to the assumption's validity and, when necessary, the reasons for its failure.


Nuclear Envelope Nuclear Concentration Diffusional Equilibrium Control Oocyte Cytoplasmic Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Erecinska, M. and Wilson, D.F., 1982, J. Membr. Biol., 70:1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Frank, M. and Horowitz, S.B., 1978 J. Cell. Sci., 19:127.Google Scholar
  3. Horowitz, S.B. and Miller, D.S., 1984, J. Cell. Biol., 99:172s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Horowitz, S.B. and Paine, P.L., 1974, Biophvs. J., 25:45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horowitz, S.B., Paine, P.L., Tluczek, L. and Reynhout, J.K., 1979, Biophvs. J., 25:33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lust, W.D., Feussner, G.K., Barbehehn, E.K. and Passoneau, J.V., 1981, Anal, Biochem., 110:258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Siebert, G. and Humphrey, G.B., 1965, Adv. Enzvmol., 239.Google Scholar
  8. Tluczek, L., Lau, Y.T. and Horowitz, S.B., 1984, Dev. Biol., 104:97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wallace, R., 1963, Biochem, Biophys. Acta, 74:495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel B. Horowitz
    • 1
  • David S. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and BiophysicsMichigan Cancer FoundationDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations