Panel Discussions

Session 1. Understanding Brain Mechanisms and the Challenge of Artificial Intelligence Machines: An Interdisciplinary Approach Session 2. Sixth Generation Computers: A Sketch
  • Enrico Clementi
  • Steven Chin

Abstract

Editorial Comments: In the following we are reporting excerpts from roundtable discussions on the topics listed above. The moderator for these panel discussions was Berni Alder (Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A.), Unfortunately, only parts of these discussions are reported herein due to the fact that the participants were not always within range of the microphone used to record these proceedings. The editors of this volume wish to beg your forgiveness for not having foreseen this problem.

Keywords

Radar Soliton Oligomer Polypeptide Gallium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.B. Dennis, “Data Flow Supercomputers,” Computer, Nov. 1980, p. 480.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.B. Dennis and G.G. Rong, “Maximum Pipelining of Array Operations on Static Data Flow Machines,” Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Parallel Processing, Aug. 1984, p. 331.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.B. Ackerman, “Data Flow Languages,” Proc. of Nat. Comp. Conf., Vol. 48, 1979, p. 1087.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Agerwala and Arvind, “Data Flow Systems,” Computer, Vol. 15, No. 2, Feb. 1982, p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.D. Gajski, D.A. Padua, D.J. Kuck and R.H. Kuhn, “A Second Opinion on Data Flow Architecture and Languages,” Computer, Vol. 15, Feb. 1982, p. 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.R. Gurd, C.C. Kirkham and I. Watson, “The Manchester Prototype Dataflow Computer,” Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 28, Jan. 1985, p. 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.P.W. Bohm, J.R. Gurd and J. Seargent, “Hardware and Software Enhancement of the Manchester Dataflow Machine,” Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Parallel Processing, Aug. 1985, p. 420.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I.M. Patnaik, R. Govindarajan and N.S. Ramadoss, “Design and Performance Evaluation of EXMAN: An Extended MANchester Data Flow Computer,” Trans. Comp., Vol c-35, No. 3, March 1986, p. 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. Hartimo, K. Kronlof, O. Simula and J. Skytta, “DFSP: A Data Flow Signal Processor,” Trans. Comp., Vol. c-35, No. 1, Jan. 1986, p. 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V.P. Srini, “An Architectural Comparison of Dataflow Systems,” Computer, Vol. 18, No. 3., Mar. 1986, p. 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.W. Carlson and K. Hwang, “Algorithmic Performance of Dataflow Multiprocessors,” Computer, No. 18, Vol. 12, Dec. 1985, p. 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.L. Gaudiot, “Structure Handling in Data Flow Systems,” Trans. Comp., Vol c-35, No. 6, June 1986, p. 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H.T. Kung, “Why Systolic Architectures,” Computer, Vol. 15, No. 1, Jan. 1982.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.T. Kung and C.E. Leiserson, “Systolic Arrays (for VLSI),” in Proc. Sparse Matrix Symp. (SIAM), 1978, p. 256.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.Y. Kung, K.S. Arun, R.J. Gal-Ezer, and D.V. Bhaskar Rao, “Wavefront Array Processor: Language, Architecture and Applications,” Trans. Comp., Vol. C31, No. 11, Nov. 1982, p. 1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.Y. Kung, “On Supercomputing with Systolic/Wavefront Array Processors,” Proc. of the IEEE, Vol. 72, No. 7, July 1984.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.J. Li and B.W. Wah, “The Design of Optimal Systolic Arrays,” Trans. Comp., Vol. c34, No. 1, Jan. 1985, p. 66.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Leighton and C.E. Leiserson, “Wafer-Scale Integration of Systolic Arrays,” Trans. Comp., Vol. c34, No. 5, May 1985, p. 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D.I. Moldovan and J.A.B. Fortes, “Partitioning and Mapping Algorithms into Fixed Size Systolic Arrays,” Trans. Comp., Vol. c35, No. 1, Jan. 1986, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.(a)
    J.W. Goodman, Proceedings of the 1985 International Conference on Parallel Processing, IEEE Catalog No. 85CH2140-2, pp. 282, 334.Google Scholar
  21. (b).
    A. Huang, same as above, p. 290.Google Scholar
  22. 21.(a)
    D.O. Cowan and F.M. Wiggin, “The organic solid state,” in Chemical and Engineering News, July 21, 1986 issue, p. 27.Google Scholar
  23. (b).
    P. Chandhari, “Electronic and Magnetic Materials,” in Scientific American, October, 1986 issue, p. 136.Google Scholar
  24. (c).
    J.M. Rowell, “Photonic Materials,” in Scientific American, October, 1986 issue, p. 146.Google Scholar
  25. 22.(a)
    G. Del Re, J. Ladik, and G. Biczo, Phys. Rev., 155, 997 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. (b).
    J.M. Andre, L. Gouverneur, and G. Leroy, Int. J. Quant. Chem., 1, 427 and 451 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 23.
    J.L. Bredas and G.B. Street, Accts. of Chem. Res., 18, 309 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 24.
    A. Aviram and M.A. Ratner, Chem. Phys. Lett., 29, 277 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 25.
    A. Aviram, P.E. Seiden, and M.A. Ratner, in “Molecular Electronic Devices,” F.L. Carter, ed., Marcel Dekker, p. 5 (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Clementi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Steven Chin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.International Business Machines CorporationKingstonUSA
  2. 2.IBM CorporationKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations