Advertisement

The Pius Principle and the Secure Reactor Concepts

  • Kåre Hannerz
Part of the Advances in Nuclear Science and Technology book series (ANST, volume 19)

Abstract

The purpose of introducing the SECURE reactor concepts is, simply stated, to surmount the present impediments to the rational use of nuclear energy in many countries.

Keywords

Fuel Assembly Steam Generator Primary System Boron Content Pool Water 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Perrow, “Normal accidents; Living with high risk technologies”, Basic Books, New York (1984).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Babala, A Fast Semi-Implicit Integration Method for Thermohydraulic Networks, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 47, 295–296, (1984).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Babala and K. Hannerz, Pressurized Water Reactor Core Protection by Primary System Thermohydraulics, Nucl. Sci. and Eng., 90, 400–410, (1985).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Hannerz, Applying PIUS to power generation: The SECURE-P LWR, Nuclear Eng. Internati., 41–46, December 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Hannerz, Adapting LWR to Future Needs: SECURE-P (PIUS), Nuclear Europe 12, p. 29–33, (1984).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. R. Gebart, P. H. Alfredsson, A. K. Johansson, and I.A.A. Lindblad, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. How to reduce mixing at a density interface. Paper accepted for presentation at the IUTAM symposium “Fluid Mechanics in the Spirit of G.I. Taylor”, Cambridge, England, 24–26 March, 1986.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. T. Landahl, W. R. Malkus, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., Fluctuation enhanced diffusion in a pipe containing stably stratified fluid. Fluid Dynamics Division, American Physical Society meeting, Tucsón, Arizona, November 1985.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. T. Järnstrëm, Experience of primary circuit water chemistry in Loviisa 1 NPP. Symposium on Water Chemistry of Nuclear Reactor Systems, Bournemouth, England (1980), p. 285–288.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anon., Diving makes a splash in the services market, Nucl. Eng. Internati. 14–15 (November, 1984 ).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. L. Hollis, Diving cuts repair costs, Nucl. Eng. Internatl. 25–26 July (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. M. Weinberg and I. Spiewak, Inherently Safe Reactors and a Second Nuclear Era, Science, 29 224, p. 1398–1401 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, Nuclear Power in an age of Uncertainty, (1984).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Wakabayashi, Tokyo University, et al., 12 papers on modified PIUS type reactor (ISER), presented at workshop on Inherently Safe Reactors of the Institute of Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, August 14–15, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kåre Hannerz
    • 1
  1. 1.AB ASEA-ATOMVästeråsSweden

Personalised recommendations