Skip to main content

On Defining a De Minimis Risk Level for Carcinogens

  • Chapter
Book cover De Minimis Risk

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Risk Analysis ((CIRA,volume 2))

  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

Several attempts have been made to use the variation in the levels of natural background radiation to define an acceptable level risk for man-made radiation. The philosophical basis for such proposals is that since no correlations have been detected between variations in natural background radiation and adverse health effects, small additions to natural exposure should be acceptable. The difficulty lies in defining “small.” In 1978, Adler and Weinberg proposed using the standard deviation of background radiation levels as a method for establishing radiation exposure limits (Adler and Weinberg 1978). The Adler and Weinberg proposal results in the suggestion that a lifetime cancer risk of about 10−4 is de minimis.* The Adler and Weinberg de minimis risk level was based on the standard deviation of human exposure to background terrestrial and cosmic radiation. We propose to determine the risk levels associated with the standard deviation of human exposure to other radioactive and chemical carcinogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, H. I. and A. M. Weinberg, “An Approach to Setting Radiation Standards,” Health Physics 34: 719–720, (June 1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Air Resources Board and Department of Human Services, Report to the Scientific Review Panel on Benzene, (November 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogen, K. T. and A. S. Goldin, Population Exposure to External Natural Radiation Background in the United States 1960–2000,Environmental Protection Agency ORP/CSD 72–1 (August 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcinogen Assessment Group, “Relative Carcinogenic Potencies among 53 Chemicals Evaluated by the Carcinogen Assessment Group as Suspect Human Carcinogens,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (October 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Radiation Protection Bureau, “Section on Uranium from the Canadian Radiation Protection Bureau, Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality,” supporting documentation to Health and Welfare, Ottawa, Canada (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cothern, R. C., “Techniques for the Assessment of Carcinogenic Risk Due to Drinking Water Contaminants” CRC Critical Reviews in Press: 32, (October 17, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cothern, R. C., and W. L. Lappenbusch, “Occurrence of Uranium in Drinking Water in the U.S.,” Health Physics 45(1): 89–99, (July 1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cothern, R. C., W. L. Lappenbusch and J. A. Cotruvo, “Health Effect Guidance for Uranium in Drinking Water,” Health Physics 44(1): 377–384, (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cothern, R. C., W. L. Lappenbusch and J. Michel, “Drinking Water Contribution to Natural Background Radiation,” Health Physics 50(1): 33–47, (January 1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drury, J. S., S. Reynolds, P. T. Owen, R. H. Ross and J. T. Ensminger, “Uranium in the U.S. Surface, Ground, and Domestic Waters,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA–570/9–81–001 (1981). Environmental Protection Agency, “Notice of Proposed Maximum Contaminant Levels of Radioactivity,” U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register 40: 34324, (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency, “Formaldehyde Determination of Significant Risk,” Federal Register 49: 21870, (May 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. D., J. H. Harley, W. Jacobi, A. S. McLean, W. A. Mills and C. G. Stewart, “Estimate of Risk from Environmental Exposure to Radon-222 and its Decay Products,” Nature 290 (March 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn, A. R., R. B. Gammage, C. S. Dudney, B. E. Hingerty, D. D. Schuresko, D. C. Parzyck, D. R. Womack, S. A. Morris, R. R. Westley, D. A. White, and J. M. Schrimsher, An Indoor Air Quality Study of Forty East Tennessee Homes, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL-5965 (December 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, J. and W. S. Moore, “228Ra and226Ra content of groundwater in fall line aquifers,” Health Physics 38: 336–671, (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, The Effects on Populations of Exposures to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR-1 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, The Effects on Populations of Exposures to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR-3 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Radiation Protection, Evaluation of Occupational and Environmental Exposures to Radon and Radon Daughters in the United States, NCRP Report 78 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nero, A. V., “Indoor Concentrations of Radon 222 and Its Daughters: Sources, Range, and Environmental Influences,” Indoor Air and Human Health, ed. by R. B. Gammage and S. V. Kaye, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Mich., 43–67, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plant Operations, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG-0880, Rev. 1 (May 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Proposed Revision of 10 CFR Part 20, “Standard Protection Against Radiation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission SECY-85–147-Part 1 (April 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, D. T., Natural Radiation Exposure in the United States, Office of Radiation Programs, Environmental Protection Agency (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, R. W., “Indoor Radon Results in the United States,” Terradex Corporation (June 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, J. M., A. Thomas, J. Bailor, C. Keith, J. DeMarco, K. K. Kropp, G. G. Robeck, D. R. Seeger, C. J. Slocum, B. L. Smith and A. A. Stevens, “National Organics Reconnaissance Survey for Halogenated Organics,” Journal AWWA: 634— 652, (November 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, C. C., S. A. Richter, E.A.C. Crouch, R. Wilson, and E. Klema, “Cancer Risk Management”, Environmental Science and Technology 21:415–420, (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turekian, K. K. and L. H. Chen, “The Marine Geochemistry of Uranium Isotopes, 230Th and 231Pa, Activation Analysis,” Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry, ed. by A. O. Brunfelt and E. Steinnes, UNIVERSITETSPOR-LAGET, Oslo-Berger-Tromso (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Scientific Committee of the Effects of Atomic Radiation, “Ionizing Radiation: Sources and Biological Effects,” 19, U.N., New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. P., E. L. Etnier and L. M. McDowell-Boyer, Radium-226 in Drinking Water and Terrestrial Food Chains: A Review of Parameters and an Estimate of Potential Exposure and Dose, ORNL/TM-8597 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Travis, C.C., Richter, S.A. (1987). On Defining a De Minimis Risk Level for Carcinogens. In: Whipple, C. (eds) De Minimis Risk. Contemporary Issues in Risk Analysis, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5293-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5293-8_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5295-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5293-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics