Comprehensive Evaluation of Human Data

  • David G. Hoel
  • Philip J. Landrigan
Part of the Life Science Monographs book series (LSMO)


Several techniques can be used to perform a comprehensive evaluation of data from multiple studies. Assessment of the quality of information provided by each individual study is, of course, a prerequisite to using the collective approaches; however, it is the simultaneous evaluation of data from multiple, often apparently conflicting studies that constitutes the core of epidemiological risk assessment and forms the basis for the establishment of dose-response relationships between chemical exposure and human disease.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Axelson, O. 1980. Aspects of confounding and effect modification in the assessment of occupational cancer risk.J. Toxicol. Environ. Health6:1127–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beaumont, J. J., and N. J. Breslow. 1981. Power consideration in epidemiologic studies of vinyl chloride workers.Am. J. Epidemiol. 114:725–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Copeland, K. T., H. Checkoway, A. J. McMichael, and R. H. Holbrook. 1977. Bias due to misclassi-fication in the estimation of relative risk.Am. J. Epidemiol. 105:488–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Day, N. E., and C. C. Brown. 1980. Multistage models and primary prevention of cancer.J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 64:977–989.Google Scholar
  5. Doll, R., and A. B. Hill. 1956. Lung cancer and other causes of death in relation to smoking-A second report on the mortality of British doctors.Br. Med. J. 2:1071–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doll, R., M. P. Vessey, R. W. R. Beasley, A. R. Buckley, E. C. Fear, R. E. W. Fisher, E. J. Gammon, W. Gunn, G. O. Hughes, K. Lee, and B. Norman-Smith. 1972. Mortality of gasworkers: Final report of a prospective study.Br. J. Ind. Med. 29:394–406.Google Scholar
  7. Fralick, R. A. 1983. The role of epidemiology in defining an occupational carcinogen.Occup. Health Ontario4:2–16.Google Scholar
  8. Gehlbach, S. H. 1982.Interpreting the Medical Literature: A Clinician’s Guide. D.C. Health and Company, Lexington ,Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  9. Haenszel, W., and K. E. Täuber. 1964. Lung cancer mortality as related to residence and smoking histories. II. White females. J.Natl. Cancer Instl. 32:803–838.Google Scholar
  10. Hernberg, S. 1980. Evaluation of epidemiologic studies in assessing the long-term effects of occupational noxious agents.Scand. J. Work Environ. Health6:163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill, A. B. 1962.Statistical Methods in Clinical and Preventive Medicine. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, A. B. 1965. The environment and disease. Association or causation?Proc. R. Soc. Med. 58:295– 300.Google Scholar
  13. Hoel, D. G. 1985. The impact of occupational exposure patterns on quantitative risk estimation. InBanbury Report 19, Risk Quantitation and Regulatory Policy. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.Google Scholar
  14. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1982.Some Industrial Chemicals and Dyestuffs. IARC Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, Volume 29. Lyon.Google Scholar
  15. Kleinbaum, D. G., L. L. Kupper, and H. Morganstern. 1982. Epidemiologic research. Principles and quantitative methods. Chapter 2 inFundamentals of Epidemiologic Research. Lifetime Learning, Belmont, California.Google Scholar
  16. Lloyd, J. W. 1971. Long-term mortality of steelworkers. V. Respiratory cancer in coke plant workers.J. Occup. Med. 13:53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monson, R. R. 1980.Occupational Epidemiology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida 219 pp.Google Scholar
  18. National Research Council. 1983.Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. Pike, M. C., and B. E. Henderson. 1981. Epidemiology of polycyclic hydrocarbons: Quantifying the cancer risk from cigarette smoking and air pollution. Pp. 317–334 in H. V. Gelboin and P. O. P. Ts’o, eds.Polycyclic Hydrocarbons and Cancer,Volume 3. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Rinskey, R. A., R. D. Zumwalde, R. J. Waxweiler, W. E. Murray, Jr., P. J. Bierbaum, P. J. Landrigan, M. Terpilak, and C. Cox. 1981a. Cancer mortality at a naval nuclear shipyard.Lancet1:231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rinskey, R. A., R. J. Young, and A. B. Smith. 1981b. Leukemia in benzene workers.Am. J. Ind. Med. 2:217–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rothman, K. 1976. Causes.Am. J. Epidemiol. 104:587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Susser, M. 1973.Causal Thinking in the Health Sciences: Concepts and Strategies of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Susser, M. 1977. Judgment and causal inference: Criteria in epidemiologic studies.Am. J. Epidemiol. 105:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weinstein, I. B. 1981. Current concepts and controversies in chemical carcinogenesis.J. Supramol. Struct. Cell. Biochem. 17:99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weiss, N. S. 1981. Inferring causal relationships: Elaboration of the criterion of “dose-response.”Am. J. Epidemiol. 113:487–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zavon, M. R., W. Hoegg, and E. Bingham. 1973. Benzidine exposure as a cause of bladder tumors.Arch. Environ. Health27:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • David G. Hoel
    • 1
  • Philip J. Landrigan
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Biometry and Risk AssessmentNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesResearch Triangle ParkUSA
  2. 2.Division of Environmental and Occupational MedicineMt. Sinai Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations