A Link between Training and Practice
  • Paul D. Nelson
  • Patricia J. Aletky


Accreditation implies quality in education, training, and professional service. It is both a process and a status by which institutions or programs are publicly recognized as having met certain criteria or standards of performance. The Council on Postsecondary Accreditation, whose function is to promulgate principles of practice in accreditation and facilitate high-quality of service among postsecondary education accrediting agencies, refers in its definition of accreditation to a recognition of institutions and programs for the level of performance, integrity, and quality that entitles them to the confidence invested in them by the educational community and the public they serve (Council on Postsecondary Accreditation, 1985). Thus public accountability is at the heart of accreditation. Although it is a voluntary, nongovernmental process as practiced in the United States, accreditation has assumed a quasi-public nature in the evaluation of education and training as well as professional service functions. It is a process founded on institutional or program self-study, peer evaluation, and adherence to valid published standards.


American Psychological Association Psychological Service Accreditation Process Public Accountability Professional Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Association of Correctional Psychologists. (1980). Standards for psychology services in adult jails and in prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 7 (1), 81–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. (1977). Standards for providers of psychological services. American Psychologist, 32 (6), 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association (1979). Criteria for accreditation of doctoral training programs and internships in professional psychology. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association. (1981a). Ethical principles of psychologists. American Psychologist, 36 (6), 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American Psychological Association. (1981b). Specialty guidelines for the delivery of services. American Psychologist, 36 (6), 640–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. APA Committee on Legislation. (1967). A model for state legislation affecting for practice of psychology 1967. American Psychologist, 22 (12), 1095–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. APA Committee on Training in Clinical Psychology. (1947). Recommended graduate training programs in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 2, 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. APA Committee on Training in Clinical Psychology. (1949). Doctoral training programs in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 4, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Council on Postsecondary Accreditation. (1985). The balance wheel for accreditation. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  10. Garni, K., Gelwick, B., Lamb, D., McKinley, D., Schoenberg, B., Simono, R., Smith, J. E., Wierson, P., & Wrenn, R. (1982). Accreditation guidelines for university and college counseling services. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1–6.Google Scholar
  11. Goodstein, L. D., & Ross, S. (1966). Accreditation of graduate programs in psychology: An analysis. American Psychologist, 21, 218–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals. (1984). Accreditation manual for hospitals. Chicago: Author.Google Scholar
  13. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals. (1985). Consolidated standards manual for child, adolescent, and adult psychiatric, alcoholism, and drug abuse facilities. Chicago: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Kells, H. R. (1983). The accreditors. Washington, DC: Council on Postsecondary Accreditation.Google Scholar
  15. Kissick, W. L., & Grubb, C. T. (1984). Perspectives on specialized accreditation in health services administration. The Journal of Health Administration Education, 2 (4), 419–429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Merton, R. K. (1969). The functions of the professional association. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 26, 636–641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Millard, R. M. (1983a). Evolution of accrediting standards. Accreditation, Council on Postsecondary Accreditation Newsletters, 8, 2.Google Scholar
  18. Millard, R. M. (1983b). The accrediting association: Ensuring the quality of programs and institutions. Change, May/June, 33–36.Google Scholar
  19. Petersen, D. G. (1979). Accrediting standards and guidelines: A current profile. Washington, DC: Council on Postsecondary Accreditation.Google Scholar
  20. Sanford, F. H. (1951). Annual report of the executive secretary: 1951. American Psychologist, 6, 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scott, R. A. (1983). The state commission: Who controls the process? Change, May/June, 33–37.Google Scholar
  22. Sears, R. R. (1947). Clinical training facilities: 1947. A report from the Committee on Graduate and Professional Training. American Psychologist, 2, 199–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stapp, J., Fulcher, R., & Wicherski, M. (1984). The employment of 1981 and 1982 doctorate recipients in psychology. American Psychologist 39 (12), 1408–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. U.S. Code Ann. (1986) 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. Code Ann. (1986) 42 U.S.C. § 1395x (r).Google Scholar
  26. VandenBos, G., & Stapp, J. (1983). Service providers in psychology: Results of the 1982 APA human resources survey. American Psychologist, 38 (12), 1330–1352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Young, K. E. (1983). Prologue: The changing scope of accreditation. In K. E. Young, C. M. Chambers, H. R. Keils, and Associates (Eds.), Understanding accreditation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul D. Nelson
    • 1
  • Patricia J. Aletky
    • 1
  1. 1.American Psychological AssociationUSA

Personalised recommendations