Advertisement

The Multiple Facets of Eve: The Place of Premenstrual Syndrome in the Taxonomy of Affective Behavior

  • Benson E. Ginsburg

Abstract

My interest in premenstrual syndrome (PMS) was, like Virginia Cassara’s (see her chapter, this volume), personally motivated. Where hers was a response to subjectively felt distress associated with the premenstrual phase of her cycle, mine, while also a reaction to such experiences, was necessarily observational. I have known a young woman undergoing troublesome periodic changes of mood who, once she had related these to her menstrual cycle, sought medical help and information with only limited success. One has only to see and know such a person, let alone to be one, in order to be convinced that the phenomenon we are here calling PMS is real, and that whatever psychological manifestations are involved, that it is also biologically based by virtue of its tight correlation with the hormonal events associated with the menstrual cycle. It would seem, therefore, a reasonable expectation to find clinical studies in which hormonal differences between women experiencing premenstrual psychological stress and women not seriously affected in this way would have been described, and, further, to find clinical practice taking advantage of these findings and providing diagnostic tests to identify the particular imbalance involved in each case, as well as the means to achieve a normal equilibrium with the expected amelioration of symptoms. Given the complexity of the hormonal systems involved in the menstrual cycle, it was also my expectation that there would be multiple etiologies, and that these would not necessarily be confined to the hormonal changes associated with the cycle, but would include neural and psychological events as well.

Keywords

Aggressive Behavior Menstrual Cycle Premenstrual Syndrome Premenstrual Symptom Affective Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Corson, S. A., E. O’L.Corson, R. E. Becker, B. E. Ginsburg, A. Trattner, R. L. Connor, L. A. Lucas, J. Panksepp, and J. P. Scott, 1980. Interaction of genetics and separation in canine hyperkinesis and in differential responses to amphetamine.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences 15: 5–11.Google Scholar
  2. Danforth, D. N. and J. R. Scott (Eds.), 1986.Obstetrics and Gynecology(fifth edition). J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  3. Fisher, A. E., 1955. The effects of differential early treatment on the social and exploratory behavior of puppies. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  4. Ginsburg, B. E., 1966. All mice are not created equal: Recent findings on genes and behavior.Social Service Review 40: 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ginsburg, B. E., 1979. The violent brain: Is it everyone’s brain ĭn:.C. R. Jeffery (Ed.),Biology and Crime. Sage Research Progress Series in Criminology, Volume 10. Sage Publications (in cooperation with the American Society of Criminology), Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 47–64.Google Scholar
  6. Ginsburg, B. E., 1983. Genetic factors in aggressive behavior.Psychoanalytic Inquiry 2: 49–71.Google Scholar
  7. Ginsburg, B. E., R. E. Becker, A. Trattner, and S. R. Bareggi, 1984. A genetic taxonomy of hyperkinesis in the dog.International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 2: 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ginsburg, B. E., L. C. Vigue, W. A. Larson, and S. C. Maxson, 1981. Y-Chromosome length in sublines of two mouse strains.Behavior Genetics 11: 359–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldsmith, L. T., 1986. Puberty, adolescence and the clinical aspects of normal menstruation. In: D. N. Danforth and J. R. Scott (Eds.),Obstetrics and Gynecology(fifth edition). J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA, Chapter 8.Google Scholar
  10. Kinch, R. A. and G. E. Robinson, 1985. Symposium: Premenstrual syndrome Current knowledge and new directions.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 30: 467–468.Google Scholar
  11. Mac Donald, K. B. and B. E. Ginsburg, 1981. Induction of normal prepubertal behavior in wolves with restricted rearing.Behavioral and Neural Biology 33: 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mackenzie, T. B., K. Wilcox, and H. Baron, 1986. Lifetime prevalence of psychiatric disorders in women with perimenstrual difficulties.Journal of Affective Disorders 10: 15–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin, N. G., K. S. Kendler, A. C. Heath, D. Handelsman, and L. J. Eaves, 1986. Genetic factors in use and side effects of oral contraceptives. Paper presented at the 16th annual meeting of the Behavior Genetics Association, Honolulu, HI, June.Google Scholar
  14. Maxson, S. C., B. E. Ginsburg, and A. Trattner, 1979. Interaction of Y-chromosomal and autosomal gene(s) in the development of intermale aggression in mice.Behavior Genetics 9: 219–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicol, S. E. and 1. I. Gottesman, 1983. Clues to the genetics and neurobiology of schizophrenia.American Scientist 71: 398–404.Google Scholar
  16. Norris, R. V. and C. Sullivan, 1983.PMS: Premenstrual Syndrome. Rawson Associates, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  17. Selmanoff, M. K. and B. E. Ginsburg, 1981. Genetic variability in aggression and endocrine function in inbred strains of mice. In: P. F. Brain and D. Benton (Eds.),MultidiscipUnary Approaches to Aggression Research. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp. 247-268. 402Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benson E. Ginsburg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Biobehavioral Sciences Graduate Degree Program, Department of PsychologyThe University of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryThe University of Connecticut Health CenterFarmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations