Should Premenstrual Syndrome Be a Legal Defense?
Before premenstrual syndrome (PMS) can be accepted as a basis for a legal defense, three conditions need to be fulfilled. First, the narrow definition must be recognized, understood, and followed. Second, it must be shown that treatment has diminished the occurrence of criminal acts. Third, effective treatment must be freely available and implemented with adequate supervision to ensure that criminal acts are not repeated during successive premenstra.
KeywordsLuteinizing Hormone Follicle Stimulate Hormone Luteal Phase Postnatal Depression Luteinizing Hormone Receptor
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dalton, K., 1955. Discussion on the Premenstrual Syndrome.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 60: 415–417.Google Scholar
- Dalton, K., 1982a. Legal implications of PMS.World Medicine,April 17, pp. 93–94.Google Scholar
- Dalton,K., 1982b. An overview premenstrual tension. In: R. Friedman (Ed.),Menstruation and Behaviour. Marcel Dekker, New York, Chapter 11.Google Scholar
- Dalton, K., 1984.Premenstrual Syndrome and Progesterone Therapy(second edition). Year Book Publishers, Chicago; and William Heinemann Medical Books, London.Google Scholar
- Dalton, K., 1985. Progesterone prophylaxis used successfully in Postnatal Depression.The Practitioner 229: 507–508.Google Scholar
- Dalton, M. E., 1984b. The diagnostic value of sex hormone binding globulin in women with premenstrual syndrome. Paper presented at the 15th International Congress of the International Society for Psychoneuroendocrinology, Vienna, June.Google Scholar
- Dalton, M. E., 1985. Nasal absorption of progesterone. Paper presented at the International Premenstrual Syndrome Symposium, Los Angeles, CA, June.Google Scholar
- Janiger, O., R. Riffenburgh, and R. Kersch, 1972. Cross cultural study of premenstrual symptoms.Psychosomaties 13: 226–235.Google Scholar