Media Treatment of Premenstrual Syndrome

  • Mary Brown Parlee


This topic was included in the Conference because, as the list of participants reflects, the phenomenon of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and scientific knowledge about it bear on a wide range of clinical, social, and legal issues. Media coverage is one means by which the science-based knowledge about PMS is conveyed to the general public and to those non-scientific professionals for whom it is relevant. Research on the mass communication and the media has traditionally been conducted by sociologists, none of whom as yet has focused on contemporary media treatments of PMS or of women’s reproductive functions more generally (e.g., Curran, Gurevitch, & Wollacott, 1979; Dexter & White, 1964). Because of the importance of the topic for PMS researchers, however, this paper attempts to bridge the gap between relatively technical scholarly treatments of the media by sociologists (see, for example, works cited in Gans, 1979) and the practical concerns of the working scientists dealing with the media. It draws, in part, on the author’s experience as a full-time writer and editor for a monthly magazine covering social science, as chair of the Public Information Committee of the American Psychological Association during the time the Association was developing and testing strategies for promoting responsible media coverage of psychological research, and as a researcher who has often interacted with media representatives covering PMS and/or menstrual cycle research. As Dr. Halbreich suggested in discussion at the Conference, media coverage of PMS may represent a useful model for analysis of the complex issues arising in media treatment of medical subjects more generally (Dick, 1954). Systematic research of this sort is needed to bridge solidly the gap to which this paper is addressed in a necessarily preliminary way.


Menstrual Cycle Media Coverage Premenstrual Syndrome Invisible College Menstrual Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abraham, S., M. Mira, D. McNeil, J. Vizzard, I. Fraser, and D. Llewellyn-Jones, 1985. Changes in mood and physical symptoms during the menstrual cycle. In: M. Y. Dawood, J. L. McGuire, and L. M. Demers (Eds.), Premenstrual Syndrome and Dysmenorrhea. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, MD, pp. 41–50.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association, 1981. Media Guide for Psychologists. Public Information Office, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Andersch, B. and 1. Milson, 1982. An epidemiological study of young women with dysmenorrhea. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 144: 655–660.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, P. and T. Luckman, 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. Doubleday and Co., Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks-Gunn, J. and D. N. Ruble, 1982. The development of menstrual-related beliefs and behaviors during early adolescence. Child Development 53: 1567–1577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks-Gunn, J. and D. N. Ruble, 1983. The experience of menarche from a developmental perspective. In: J. Brooks-Gunn and A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at Puberty: Biological and Psychosocial Perspectives. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 155–177.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, J., D. N. Ruble, and A. Clarke, 1977. College women’s attitudes and expectations concerning menstrual related changes. Psychosomatic Medicine 39: 288–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Caplow, T. and R. J. McGee, 1965. The Academic Marketplace. Doubleday and Co., Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
  9. Cassell, J., 1982. Does risk-benefit analysis apply to moral evaluation of social research? In: T. L. Beauchamp, R. R. Faden, R. J. Wallace, Jr., and L. Walters (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Social Science Research. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp. 144–162.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, A. and D. N. Ruble, 1978. Young adolescents’ beliefs concerning menstruation. Child Development 49: 201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crane, D., 1967. The gatekeepers of science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. The American Sociologist 2: 195–201.Google Scholar
  12. Crane, D., 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  13. Curran, J., M. Gurevitch, and J. Wollacott (Eds.), 1979. Mass Communication and Society. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Curtis, J. E. and J. W. Petras (Eds.), 1970. The Sociology of Knowledge: A Reader. Praeger Publishers, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  15. Dalton, K., 1982. Premenstrual tension: An overview. In: R. C. Friedman (Ed.), Behavior and the Menstrual Cycle. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp. 217–242.Google Scholar
  16. Dawood, M. Y., 1985. Overall approaches to the management of dysmenorrhea. In: M. Y. Dawood, J. L. McGuire, and L. M. Demers (Eds.), Premenstrual Syndrome and Dysmenorrhea. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, MD, pp. 177–201.Google Scholar
  17. Dexter, L. A. and D. M. White (Eds.), 1964. People, Society, and Mass Communication. The Free Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  18. Dick, W. E., 1954. Science and the press. Impact of Science on Society 5: 143–173.Google Scholar
  19. Enzensberger, H. M., 1974. The Consciousness Industry. Seabury Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  20. Gans, H. J., 1979. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Pantheon, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  21. Gitlin, T., 1983. Inside Prime Time. Pantheon, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  22. Halbreich, U., J. Endicott, and J. Nee, 1983. Premenstrual depressive changes: Value of differentiation. Archives of General Psychiatry 40: 535–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halbreich, U., J. Endicott, and S. Schacht, 1982. The diversity of premenstrual changes as reflected in the premenstrual assessment form. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 65: 46–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halmos, P. (Ed.), 1972. The sociology of science. The Sociological Review Monograph ,No. 18.Google Scholar
  25. Koeske, R. D. and G. F. Koeske, 1975. An attributional approach to moods and the menstrual cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31: 473–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laws, S., 1983. The sexual politics of pre-menstrual tension. Women’s Studies International Forum 6: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mannheim, K., 1936. Ideology and Utopia. [Translated from German by L. Wirth and E. Shils.] Harcourt Brace and Co., New York, NY.Google Scholar
  28. Mannheim, K., 1952. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Edited by P. Kecskemeti. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  29. Merton, R. K., 1942. Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1: 115–126.Google Scholar
  30. R. K. Merton, 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure (revised and enlarged edition). The Free Press, New York, NY, pp. 604–615.Google Scholar
  31. Merton, R. K., 1972. Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology 77: 9–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merton, R. K., 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  33. Paige, K. E., 1973. Women learn to sing the menstrual blues. Psychology Today 7: 41–46.Google Scholar
  34. Parlee, M. B., 1973. The premenstrual syndrome. Psychological Bulletin 80: 454–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parlee, M. B., 1974. Stereotypic beliefs about menstruation: A methodological note on the Moos Menstrual Distress Questionnaire and some new data. Psychosomatic Medicine 36: 229–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Parlee, M. B., 1981a. Appropriate control groups in feminist research. Psychological Women’s Quarterly 5: 637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parlee, M. B., 1981b. Gaps in behavioral research on the menstrual cycle. In: P. Komnenich, M. McSweeney, J. A. Noack, and S. N. Elder (Eds.), The Menstrual Cycle, Volume 2: Research and Implications for Women’s Health. Springer Publications, New York, NY, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
  38. Parlee, M. B., 1982a. New findings: Menstrual cycles and behavior. Ms. Magazine, October, pp. 126–128.Google Scholar
  39. Parlee, M. B., 1982b. The psychology of the menstrual cycle: Biological and psychological perspectives. In: R. C. Friedman (Ed.), Behavior and the Menstrual Cycle. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
  40. Parlee, M. B., 1982c. Changes in moods and activation levels during the menstrual cycle in experimentally naive subjects. Psychological Women’s Quarterly 7: 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodin, J., 1976. Menstruation, reattribution, and competence. Journal of Perspectives and Social Psychology 33: 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rubinow, D. R. and P. Roy-Byrne, 1984. Premenstrual syndromes: Overview from a methodologic perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry 141: 163–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubinow, D. R., P. Roy-Byrne, and M. C. Hoban, 1985. Menstrually related mood disorders: Methodological and conceptual issues. In: M. Y. Dawood, J. L. McGuire, and L. M. Demers (Eds.), Premenstrual Syndrome and Dysmenorrhea. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, MD, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
  44. Ruble, D. N. and J. Brooks-Gunn, 1979. Menstrual symptoms: A social cognitive analysis of perception of symptoms. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2: 171–194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scheff, T., 1974. The labeling theory of mental illness. American Sociological Review 39: 444–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sigelman, L., 1973. Reporting the news: An organizational analysis. American Journal of Sociology 79: 132–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steinem, G., 1978. If men could menstruate: A political fantasy. Ms. Magazine, October, p. 110.Google Scholar
  48. Sudman, S., 1976. Applied Sampling. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  49. Tuchman, G., 1972. Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology 77: 660–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tuchman, G., 1978. Making News. The Free Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  51. Waite, L. J., 1981. U.S. women at work. Population Bulletin 37: 3.Google Scholar
  52. Walkowitz, J., 1980. Prostitutes and Victorian Society: Women, Class, and the State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. White, D. M., 1950. The “gatekeeper:” A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly 27: 383–390.Google Scholar
  54. Widholm, O., 1985. Epidemiology of premenstrual tension syndrome and primary dysmenorrhea. In: M. Y. Dawood, J. L. McGuire, and L. M. Demers (Eds.), Premenstrual Syndrome and Dysmenorrhea. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, MD, pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
  55. Ylikorkala, O. and M. Y. Dawood, 1978. New concepts in dysmenorrhea. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 130: 833–847.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zuckerman, H. A. and R. K. Merton, 1971. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 9: 66–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Brown Parlee
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School and University CenterCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations