Advertisement

Visible Light Induced Killing and Mutation of Acriflavine Sensitized Chinese Hamster Cells

  • Tapan Ganguly
  • Sukhendu B. Bhattacharjee
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 124)

Abstract

The acridine dyes are perhaps the most well studied photosensitizers both in vivo and in vitro. Exhaustive in vivo studies with these dyes have been made only with bacteria and bacteriophages but not with mammalian cells. The photodynamic effects in mammalian cells have been investigated mainly with the drugs hematoporphyrin, furocoumarins like 8-methoxypsoralen and chlorpromazine (6, 2, 1). Basic information regarding the target of visible light induced damage as well as the mechanism by which this damage occurs in acriflavine sensitized mammalian cells is important due to the application of these dyes in photochemotherapy.

Keywords

Singlet Oxygen Sodium Azide Washed Cell Chinese Hamster Cell Streptomycin Sulphate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. J. Ashwood-Smith, A. T. Natarajan, and E. A. Poulton, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 69:189–197 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Ben-Hur, A. Prager, M. Green, and I. Rosenthal, Chem. Biol. Interact. 29:223–233 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. B. Bhattacharjee and B. Pal, Mutat. Res. 101:329–338 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Eagle, Science 130:432–437 (1959).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Ganguly and S. B. Bhattacharjee, Photochem. Photobiol. 38:65–69 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Gomer and D. M. Smith, Photochem. Photobiol. 32:341–348 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Greuner and M. P. Lockwood, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 90:460–465 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Ito, Photochem. Photobiol. 25:47–53 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Ito and K. Kobayashi, Photochem. Photobiol. 26:581–587 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Kobayashi and T. Ito, Photochem. Photobiol. 23:21–28 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Moan, E. O. Pattersen, and T. Christensen, Br. J. Cancer 39:398–407 (1979).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Piette, C. M. Calberg-Bacq, and A. Van de Vorst, Photochem. Photobiol. 26:377–382 (1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Pottier, R. Bonneau, and J. Houssot-Dubien, Photochem. Photobiol. 22:59–61 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Wagner, W. D. Taylor, A. Keith, and W. Snipes, Photochem. Photobiol. 32:771–779 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Wagner, A. Feldman, and W. Snipes, Photochem. Photobiol. 35:73–81 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tapan Ganguly
    • 1
  • Sukhendu B. Bhattacharjee
    • 1
  1. 1.Crystallography and Molecular Biology DivisionSaha Institute of Nuclear PhysicsCalcuttaIndia

Personalised recommendations