Advertisement

Chromosome Break-Points, Somatic Mutation and Oncogene Activation: Some Comments

  • K. H. Chadwick
  • H. P. Leenhouts
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 124)

Abstract

In previous publications (3, 8) we have attempted to associate the DNA double strand break with the induction of malignancy by making use of the “somatic mutation ” theory of malignancy. In particular, we tried to align our ideas on chromosome aberrations with the then current ideas on the nature of malignancy which suggested that the factor governing malignancy behaved as a recessive gene. This idea had been developed from cell fusion experiments between malignant and non-malignant cells where it was found that the malignant factor was suppressed in the hybrids initially, but returned eventually with the loss of chromosomes from the hybrid cell (6) (see Figure 1). These results in mouse-mouse and mouse-human hybrids which were not very chromosome stable were supported by work with human-human hybrids which were much more chromosomally stable (12). When we developed these ideas we suggested that with the further development of the analysis of malignancy, we would probably have to revise our ideas, although we were convinced that radiation induced cancer and somatic mutation were directly related. However, at that time we did not anticipate the tremendous development in the investigation of the role of oncogenes in malignancy which has occurred during the past few years. In this paper we review the ideas we developed on the basis of the cell fusion-hybrid experiments and discuss some of the more recent developments in the molecular biology of malignancy with respect to the role of chromosome aberrations in the induction of malignancy.

Keywords

Chromosome Aberration Viral Oncogene Cellular Oncogene Hamster Embryo Cell Chromosome Banding Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. M. Bishop, Sci. Amer. 246:68–79 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Borek and E. J. Hall, Nature 243:450–453 (1973).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. H. Chadwick and H. P. Leenhouts, in: “The Molecular Theory of Radiation Biology,” Springer Verlag, Heidelberg (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. F. Doolittle, M. W. Hunkapiller, L. E. Hood, S. G. Devare, K. C. Robbins, S. A. Aaronson, and H. N. Antoniades, Science 221:275–277 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. H. Duesberg, Nature 304:219–226 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Harris, J. Natl. Cancer Inst 48:851–864 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Land, L. F. Parada, and R. A. Weinberg, Science 222:771–778 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. P. Leenhouts and K. H. Chadwick, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 33:357–370 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Mitelman, Nature 310:325–327 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. J. Slamon, J. B. deKernion, I. M. Verma, and M. J. Cline, Science 224:256–262 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. A. Spandidos and N. M. Wilkie, Nature 310:469–475 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. J. Stanbridge, Nature 260:17–20 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. J. Stanbridge, C. J. Der, C-J. Doersen, R. Y. Nishimi, D. M. Peehl, B. E. Weissman, and J. E. Wilkinson, Science 215:252–259 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. D. Waterfield, G. T. Scrace, N. Whittle, P. Stroobant, A. Johnson, A. Wasterson, B. Westermark, C-H. Heldin, J. S. Huang, and T. F. Denel, Nature 304:35–39 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. A. Weinberg, Scie. Amer. 249:102–117 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. J. Yunis, Science 221:227–236 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. H. Chadwick
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. P. Leenhouts
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.National Institute for Public Health and Environmental HygieneBilthovenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Association Euratom-ITALWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations