Mutants of Arabidopsis Deficient in Fatty Acid Desaturation

  • C. R. Somerville
  • P. McCourt
  • L. Kunst
  • J. Browse

Abstract

The isolation of a series of mutants with defects in lipid metabolism was originally motivated by the concept that, in order to study the functional significance of lipid unsaturation, it would be very useful to have a collection of otherwise isogenic mutant lines which differ only with respect to the activity of specific desaturases. We chose the small crucifer Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) as the experimental organism because it has a number of traits which render it particularly well-suited for physiological genetics (Estelle and Somerville 1986).

Keywords

Glycerol Chlorophyll Oligomer Photosynthesis Histidine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Browse, J., McCourt, P., and Somerville, C.R., 1985, Science 227: 763–765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Browse, J., McCourt, P., and Somerville, C.R., 1986a, Anal. Biochem., 152: 141–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Browse, J., McCourt, P., and Somerville, C.R., 1986b, Plant Physiol., 81: 859–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browse, J., Warwick, N., Somerville, C.R., and Slack, C.R., 1986, Biochem. J., 235: 25–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubacq, J.P., Drapier, D., Tremolieres, A., and Kader, J.C., 1984, Plant Cell Physiol., 25: 1197–1204.Google Scholar
  6. Dubacq, J.P., and Tremolieres, A., 1983, Physiol. Veg., 2: 293–312.Google Scholar
  7. Estelle, M.A., and Somerville, C.R., 1986, Trends in Genet., 2: 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kader, J.C., Julienne, M., and Vergnolle, C., 1984, Eur. J. Biochem., 139: 411–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laskay, G., and Lehoczki, E., 1986, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 849: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leech, R.M., Walton, CA., and Baker, N.R., 1985, Planta 165: 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCourt, P., Browse, J., Watson, J., Arntzen, C.J., and Somerville, C.R., 1985, Plant Physiol., 78: 853–858.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCourt, P., Browse, J., and Somerville, C.R., 1986, Submitted.Google Scholar
  13. Natsoulis, G., Hilger, F., and Fink, G.R., 1986, Cell 46: 235–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Norman, H., and St. John, J.B., 1986, Plant Physiol., 81: 731–736.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roughan, P.G., and Slack, C.R., 1982, Ann. Rev. Plant. Physiol., 33: 97–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Remy, R., Tremolieres, A., Ambard-Bretteville, F., 1984, Photobiochem. Photobiophys., 7: 267–276.Google Scholar
  17. Remy, R., Tremolieres, A., Duval, J.C., Ambard-Bretteville, F., and Dubacq, J.P. FEBS Lett., 137: 271–275.Google Scholar
  18. Thomas, P.G., Dominy, P.J., Vigh, L., Mansourian, A.R., Quinn, P.J., and Williams, W.P., 1986, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 849: 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tremolieres, A., Dubacq, J.P., Ambard-Bretteville, F., and Remy, R., 1981, FEBS Lett., 130: 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. R. Somerville
    • 1
  • P. McCourt
    • 1
  • L. Kunst
    • 1
  • J. Browse
    • 2
  1. 1.MSU-DOE Plant Research LaboratoryMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Plant Physiology DivisionDSIRPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations