The Use of Scanning Electron Microscopy in Bite Mark Analysis
The degree of correlation of a particular set of teeth with a certain bite mark is proportional to the number of characteristics common to both. However, individual characteristics are much more significant because they are less likely to occur purely by chance in a given population. Since the SEM can readily demonstrate individual characteristics when they are present, it can be an extremely useful tool for the forensic odontologist.
KeywordsIndividual Characteristic Class Characteristic Impression Material Bite Mark Stone Model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.J. W. Beckstead, R. D. Rawson and W. S. Giles, Review of bite mark evidence, Amer. Dental Assoc., 99: 70 (1979).Google Scholar
- 2.J. I. Ebert and H. R. Campbell, Jr., Discussion of “Photographic techniques of concern in metric bite mark analysis,” J. Forensic Sci., 30 (No. 3): 599 (1985).Google Scholar
- 3.R. F. Sognnaes, R. D. Rawson, B. M. Gratt, and N. B. T. Nguyen, Computer comparison of bitemark patterns in identical twins, Amer. Dental Assoc., 105: 449 (1982).Google Scholar
- 4.G. L. Vale, R. F. Sognnaes, G. N. Felando, T. T. Noguchi, Unusual three-dimensional bite mark evidence in a homicide case, J. Forensic Sci.. 21, (No. 3), 642 (1976).Google Scholar
- 5.R. F. Sognnaes, Forensic identifications aided by scanning electron microscopy of silicone-epoxy microreplicas of calcified and cornified structures, in: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America, Las Vegas, p. 678, 1975.Google Scholar
- 6.J. A. Cottone and M. S. Standish, “Outline of Forensic Dentistry,” Yearbook Medical Publishers, p. 118, 1982.Google Scholar
- 7.R. F. Sognnaes, Forensic bite mark measurements, Dental Survey, April p. 34, 1979.Google Scholar
- 8.T. J. David, Adjunctive use of Scanning electron microscopy in bite mark analysis: a three dimensional study, J. Forensic Sci. (in press)Google Scholar