Peninsula Hospital Community Mental Health Center Quality Assurance System

  • Lorraine L. Luft
  • Donald E. Newman


The quality assurance system at Peninsula Hospital Community Mental Health Center has evolved over time in response to the particular characteristics and requirements, both internal and external, of this organization. Thus, the current mix of the components that comprise the quality assurance system has been added at different times to satisfy different needs. In quality assurance, as in service delivery, the administrative philosophy of the center includes ongoing evaluation and monitoring to determine how adequately each program is functioning, as well as to identify unmet needs. It is important to remember, therefore, that the range of quality assurance activities described in this chapter was not planned or implemented in one thrust; as the center has grown, as the financial climate has changed, and as external requirements have multiplied, the center’s quality assurance program has grown.


Quality Assurance Community Mental Health Audit Committee Peer Review Process Center Staff 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Derogatis, L. R. (1977). The psychopathology rating scale series: A brief description.Unpublished manuscript, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  2. Levy, A. (1974). Private peer review for fiscal control of publicly funded programs. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 25, 235–238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Luft, L. L. (1983). A clinical and fiscal evaluation of peer review for high-cost mental health patients. Unpublished dissertation, Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Luft, L. L., & Fakhouri, J. (1979). A model for a comparative cost-effectiveness evaluation of two mental health partial care programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2, 33–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Luft, L. L., & Newman, D. E. (1977). Therapists’ acceptance of peer review in a community mental health center. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28, 889–894.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Luft, L. L., Sampson, L. M., & Newman, D. E. (1976). Effects of peer review on outpatient psychotherapy: Therapist and patient followup survey. American Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 891–895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Luft, L. L., Smith, K., & Kace, M. (1978) Therapists’, patients’, and inpatient staff’s views of treatment modes and outcomes. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 29, 505–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Moos, R. (1974a). Community-oriented programs environment scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  9. Moos, R. (1974b). Ward atmosphere scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  10. Newman, D. E. (1974). Peer review: A California model. Psychiatric Annals, 4, 75–85.Google Scholar
  11. Newman, D. E., & Luft, L. L. (1974). The peer review process: Education versus control. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 1363–1366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. PAL-C Scale: Profile of adaptation of life clinical scale manual.(1978). Roanoke, VA: Institute for Program Evaluation.Google Scholar
  13. Vaughan, W. T., Newman, D. E., Levy, A., & Marty, S. (1973). The private practice of community psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 24–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorraine L. Luft
    • 1
  • Donald E. Newman
    • 1
  1. 1.Peninsula Hospital Community Mental Health CenterBurlingameUSA

Personalised recommendations