Abstract
Time is a luxury for a designer: only rarely does an architect have the time to become deeply involved with the users of a building. Yet, it is only by becoming immersed within a place (which takes time) that it is possible to create what we call “configurations of possibilities.”
We used every kind of space, every different environment available to us. The railing-bound area under the front porch, in which you could stand, though you had to stoop to get through the doorway, was the jail. We played in the bushes, too. Behind them, under them, we had names for each place. There were always “forts”. Fort This and Fort That. We dug six-inch deep moats around a couple of them and tried to keep them filled with water, to the despair of my father to whose lot it fell to pay the monthly bill. We wore the grass clean off the backyard, which we used for a baseball diamond and miscellaneous scrimmaging, allstar games, etc. It took years to grow back.
We played games in the apple tree behind the garage. In fact we each “owned” a tree, divided up by common consent, and had a “fort” beneath it. There was almost always a place you could go, depending on how you felt, depending on what you felt like doing. We used the grounds and every cranny of the house, including closets and the spaces under the stairs, thoroughly.
When I was nineteen, and a visionary would-be poet in the grand tradition of Rimbaud and John Keats, I announced boldly one night to a group of friends, while we stood in the middle of a street under the thrashing trees, that a place was not simply where two roads meet, but a configuration of possibilities
—Dennis Dooley, the ARC group, 1972
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, A., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., et al. A pattern language New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
Lady Allen of Hurtwood. Planning for play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968.
Architecture Research Construction. Behavioral change on Ward 8. Journal of Architectural Education, 1976, 29 (4), 26–29.
Bakos, M., Bozic, R., Chapin, D., & Neuman, S. Effects of environmental change on elderly residents’ behavior. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1980, 31 (1), 677–682.
Dattner, R. Design for play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974.
Erikson, Erik. Childhood and society (pp. 247–261). New York: W. W. Norton, 1963.
Hart, P. J. “Humanizing architects: Feeling vs. object. AIA Journal,1973, 59(1), 41–43. Holt, J. Children are sensitive to space. School Review,1974, 82(4), 667–70. (There are many other good articles in this issue on design with children.)
Maslow, A. H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 1943, 50, 370–396. Popper, K. R. The poverty of historicism. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.
Pound, E. ABC of reading (p. 28 ). New York: New Directions, 1960.
Prangnell, P. The friendly object. Harvard Educational Review, 1969, 39 (4), 36–41.
Rivlin, L. & Wolfe, M. Institutional settings in children’s lives. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.
Spivak, M. Institutional settings: An environmental design approach (pp. 35–52). New York: Human Sciences Press, 1984.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bakos, M., Bozic, R., Chapin, D. (1987). Children’s Spaces. In: Weinstein, C.S., David, T.G. (eds) Spaces for Children. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5227-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5227-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5229-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5227-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive