Introduction: Molecular Basis of Genomic Stability and Change

  • Robert H. Haynes
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 39)


In 1952, just before publication of the epochal work of Watson and Crick on the DNA double helix, H.J. Muller argued that mutation is the result of “some biochemical disorganization in which processes normally tending to hold mutation frequencies in check are to some extent interfered with” (8). This prescient statement crisply summarizes our contemporary picture (Fig. 1) of the molecular basis of genetic stability and change (5). There are great and persistent pressures on genomes to erode as a result of the physicochemical “decay” of DNA structure under normal physiological conditions, and to mutate as a result of replication errors and attack on DNA by endogenous and exogenous mutagens. Were it not for the existence of a complex array of biochemical and other mechanisms that counteract the natural tendency for DNA to mutate and disintegrate, cells could not survive, even under “normal” conditions, and genomes could not have evolved beyond a few hundred nucleotides in length (3, 9). As indicated in Fig. 1, the potential mutation rate per nucleotide (PMR) that would be associated with nonenzymatic, purely template-directed poljrmerization (3) of nucleic acids is very high (~10−2), whereas observed residual mutation rates (RMRs) are very low (~10−9). In this context, it is interesting to note that the most skillful human keypunch operators make about one mistake per 5,000 symbols copied.


Genetic Stability Mutagen Burden Replicative Fidelity Persistent Pressure Mutagen Burden High 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ames, B.N. (1983) Dietary carcinogens and anticarcinogens. Science 221:1256–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dancoff, S.M., and H. Quastler (1953) The information content and error rate in living things. In Information Theory in Biology, H. Quastler, ed. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 263–273.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eigen, M., and P. Schuster (1979) The Hypercycle, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanawalt, P.C., P.K. Cooper, A.K. Ganesan, and C.A. Smith (1979) DNA repair in bacteria and mammalian cells. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 48:783–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haynes, R.H. (1985) Molecular mechanisms in genetic stability and change: Role of deoxyribonucleotide pool balance. In Genetic Conse-quences of Nucleotide Pool Imbalance, F. de Serres, ed. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haynes, R.H., and B.A. Kunz (1981) DNA repair and mutagenesis in yeast. In Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Life Cycle and Inheritance, J.N. Strathern, E.W. Jones, and J.R. Broach, Eds. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp. 371–414.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loeb, L.A., and T.A. Kunkel (1982) Fidelity of DNA synthesis. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 52:429–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muller, H.J. (1954) The nature of the genetic effects produced by ra-diation. In Radiation Biology, Vol. I, A. Hollaender, ed. McGraw- Hill Publishing Co., New York, p. 417.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tice, R.R., and R.B. Setlow (1985) Repair and replication in aging or-ganisms and cells. In Handbook of the Biology of Aging, 2nd ed., C.E. Finch and E.L. Schneider, eds. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, pp. 173–224.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. Haynes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations