Summary
A mathematical simulation of the human hearing mechanism, involving the non-linear effect of the middle ear, has been used to compute the risk of impairment for hearing produced by impulse noise. This model provides, therefore, a reference method which can be used for evaluating the loudness of any kind of acoustical noise. The results of impulse noise analysis obtained from different damage-risk criteria can then be compared with the results of the theoretical model, allowing for evaluation of the respective merits of these criteria.
The main conclusion of this study is that the A-weighted sound exposure level LAE appears to be the best damage-risk criterion for impulse noise. The spectral sensitivity of the human hearing mechanism might then be approximated by the A-weighting filter. These elements emphasize the possibility of using a unique damage-risk criterion applicable for any kind of noise, including continuous and fluctuating noises as well as industrial and gunfire impulse noises. This criterion would be applicable for the high peak pressure levels up to 170 dB, which can be experimentally encountered for gunfire. The damage level for a daily exposure of eight hours would be around 130 dB, corresponding to a steady state pressure level equal to 85 dB. This conclusion is in full agreement with the most recent results on impulse noise obtained by psychoacoustical experiments in the U.S., Germany, the Netherlands, and Japan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
G. R. Price, Loss of auditory sensitivity following exposure to spectrally narrow impulses, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66:456 (1979).
F. Pfander, “Das Knalltrauma,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1975).
E. O. Brigham, “The Fast Fourier Transform,” Prentice Hall, New York (1974).
J. L. Flanagan, “Speech Analysis, Synthesis and Perception,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1965).
W. D. Ward, Proposed damage-risk criterion for impulse noise (gunfire), Report of Working Group 57, National Academy of Sciences — National Research Council, Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA), Washington DC (1968).
G. F. Smoorenburg, Damage-risk criteria for impulse noise, in: “New Perpectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss,” R. Hamernik, D. Henderson and R. Salvi (eds), Raven Press, New York, (1982).
F. Pfander, H. Bongartz, H. Brinkmann and H. Kietz, Danger of auditory impairment from impulse noise: A comparative study of the CHABA damage-risk criteria and those of the Federal Republic of Germany, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:628 (1980).
G. O. Stevin, Spectral analysis of impulse noise for hearing conservation purposes, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1945 (1982).
W. S. Rhode, Observation of the vibration of the basilar membrane on squirrel monkeys using the Mossbauer technique, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:1218 (1971).
G. R. Price, “Practical application of basic research on impulse noise hazard,” U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory no 1/85 (1985).
D. W. Robinson, The spectral factor in noise-induced hearing loss: a case for retaining the A-weighting, J. of Sound and Vibr. 90:103 (1983).
S. Kuwano, S. Namba, Y. Nakajima, On the noisiness of steady state and intermittent noises, J. of Sound and Vibr. 72:87 (1980).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stevin, G.O. (1986). Mathematical Simulation of the Cochlear Mechanism Applied to Damage-Risk Criteria for Impulse Noise. In: Salvi, R.J., Henderson, D., Hamernik, R.P., Colletti, V. (eds) Basic and Applied Aspects of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. NATO ASI Series, vol 111. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5176-4_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5176-4_47
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5178-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5176-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive