Advertisement

The Response of Mammalian Cochlear Hair Cells to Acoustic Overstimulation

  • A. R. Cody
  • I. J. Russell
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 111)

Abstract

The distinct morphological division of the inner and outer hair cells (IHC, OHC) within the organ of Corti, and their respective innervation, suggest two separate roles for these receptors in normal auditory function. The IHCs receive a massive afferent innervation while the afferent innervation of the OHCs is comparatively sparse with a large number of efferent synapses on their basolateral surfaces [1,2]. This has contributed to speculation that there is a division of labour in the cochlea, with the IHCs playing a sensory role and the OHCs fulfilling a motor role, controlling the mechanical stimulus delivered to the IHCs. As primary receptors, the IHC and the OHC appear to be vulnerable links in the auditory pathway during acoustic overstimulation and therefore prime targets for the site and origin of noise-induced hearing losses (NIHL). We have attempted to substantiate this hypothesis in a series of experiments by recording directly from the IHCs and OHCs during conditions of acoustic overstimulation. The results suggest that functional differences in the behavior of these two cell groups to overstimulation may underlie the cellular basis for NIHL. These cellular changes probably account for the altered activity of the afferent fibers we have monitored in the spiral ganglion of the cochlea in previous studies, at least for temporary losses of auditory sensitivity and possibly, the more significant, permanent losses.

Keywords

Hair Cell Receptor Potential Outer Hair Cell Basilar Membrane Spiral Ganglion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Spoendlin, The innervation of the cochlear receptor, in: “Basic Mechanisms in Hearing,” A. Moller, ed., Academic Press, New York (1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. B. Warr, The olivocochlear bundle: its origins and terminations in the cat in: “Evoked Electrical Activity in the Auditory Nervous System,” R. F. Nauton and R. Fernandez, eds., Academic Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. J. Russell and P. M. Sellick, Intracellular studies of hair cells in the mammalian cochlea, J. Physiol., 284:261 (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. J. Russell and P. M. Sellick, Low frequency characteristics of intracellularly recorded receptor potentials in mammalian hair cells, J. Physiol., 338:179 (1983).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Robertson and G. A. Manley, Manipulation of frequency analysis in the cochlear ganglion of the guinea pig, J. Comp. Physiol., 91:363 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. R. Cody and I. J. Russell, Outer hair cells in the mammalian cochlea and noise-induced hearing loss, Nature, 313:662 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. K. Yates, A. R. Cody and B. M. Johnstone, Recovery of eighth nerve action potentials after exposure to short, intense pure tones: similarities with temporary threshold shift, Hearing Res., 12:305 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. M. Sellick, R. Patuzzi and B. M. Johnstone, Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mossbauer technique, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 72:131 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. J. Russell and E. M. Cowley, The influence of transient asphyxia on receptor potentials in inner hair cells in the guinea pig cochlea, Hearing Res., 11:373 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. R. Cody and B. M. Johnstone, Electrophysiological and morphological correlates in the guinea pig cochlea after exposure to “impulsive noise”, Scand. Audiol., Suppl. 12:121 (1980).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Robertson, A. R. Cody, G. Bredberg and B. M. Johnstone, Response properties of spiral ganglion neurons in cochleas damaged by direct mechanical trauma, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 67:1295 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Robertson and B. M. Johnstone, Aberrant tonotopic organization in the inner ear damaged by kanamycin, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 66:466 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. R. Cody and D. Robertson, Variability of noise-induced damage in the guinea pig cochlea: Electrophysiological and morphological correlates after strictly controlled exposures, Hearing Res., 9:55 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. R. Cody and B. M. Johnstone, Single auditory neuron response during acute acoustic trauma, Hearing Res., 3:3 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Robertson, Reversible structural abnormalities in the organ of Corti of guinea pigs with reversible hearing loss, Proc. Aust. Physiol. Pharmacol. Soc. 12:31P (1981).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. M. Sellick, R. Patuzzi and B. M. Johnstone, Modulation of responses of spiral ganglion cells in the guinea pig cochlea by low frequency sound, Hearing Res., 7:199 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    I. J. Russell and A. R. Cody, Transduction in cochlear hair cells, Mechanics of Hearing Workshop (in press).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. J. Neely and D. O. Kim, An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity, Hearing Res., 9:123 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. S. Rhode observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mossbauer technique, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 49:1218 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. M. Khanna and D. G. Leonard, Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea, Science, 215:305 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. C. Mountain, Changes in endolyphatic potential and crossed olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics, Science, 210:71 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. H. Siegal and D. O. Kim, Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical non-linearity, Hearing Res., 6:171 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. R. Cody and Johnstone, B. M., Temporary threshold shift modified by binaural acoustic stimulation, Hearing Res. 6:199 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. R. Cody, Temporary and permanent threshold shifts: An electro-physiological and histological study of the effects of acoustic overstimulation in the guinea pig, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Western Australia (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Cody
    • 1
  • I. J. Russell
    • 1
  1. 1.M. R. C. Neurophysiology, Group School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations