Advertisement

Ergopsychometric Testing

Predicting and Actualizing Optimum Performance under Load
  • Giselher Guttmann
Part of the The Plenum Series on Stress and Coping book series (SSSO)

Abstract

The question of human performance in stressful situations has long been of interest to psychologists, and the literature abounds with data stemming from carefully planned empirical investigations. However, the limited prognostic power of the findings has always been recognized. Wherever one tries to predict performance under stress, for example in sports, the discrepancy between experimental and real-life situations becomes obvious, and great caution must be exercised in the predictions of actual performance and in the endeavor to select promising talent on the basis of studies carried out in the laboratory.

Keywords

Compensation Voltage Approach Motivation Load Situation Avoidance Motivation Successful Contestant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauer, H. & Lauber, W. (1979). Operant conditioning of brain steady potential shifts in man. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 4, 145–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, H., Steinringer, H., & Schock, P. (1980). A new highly sensitive DC-amplifier for steady biopotential recording. Archiv für Psychologie, 133, 333–337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, H., & Nirnberger, G. (1980). Paired-associate learning with feedback of DC potential shifts of the cerebral cortex. Archives of Psychology, 132, 237–239.Google Scholar
  4. Bauer, H., Guttmann, G., & Trimmel, M. (1983). The Brain-Triggered CNV. In F. Denoth (Ed.), 7th International Conference on Event Related Potentials of the Brain, (September 4–10, 1983, pp. 74–75). Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  5. Beiglböck, W. (1984). Ergopsychometrische Diagnostik in der Sportpsychologie. [Ergopsychometric diagnostics in sports psychology]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  6. Bischof, B. (1984). Psychologische und psychophysiologische Moderatorvariablen in der Belastungsdiagnostik. [Psychological and psychophysiological moderator variables in testing under load]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  7. Epstein, S. (1973). Versuch einer Theorie der Angst [An attempt towards a theory of anxiety]. In N. Birbaumer (Ed.), Neuropsychologie der Angst. [Neuropsychology of anxiety] (pp. 184–241). München-Berlin-Wien: Urban & Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
  8. Epstein S., & Fenz, W. D. (1962). Theory and experiment on the measurement of approach-avoidance conflict. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 97–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guttmann, G. (1982). Ergopsychometry—Testing under physical or psychological load. The German Journal of Psychology, 6, 141–144.Google Scholar
  10. Guttmann, G. (1984). Ergopsychometry. In R. J. Gorsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology, (pp. 446 & 447). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Guttmann, G., & Bauer, H. (1982). Learning and information processing in dependence on cortical DC-potentials. In M. Rosenzweig & R. Sinz (Eds.), Psychophysiology 1980, (pp. 141–149). Jena, Fischer und Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Guttmann, G. & Bauer, H. (1984). The brain trigger design: A powerful tool to investigate brain behavior relations. Annals New York Academy of Sciences, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Guttman, G. Bauer, H., & Trimmel, M. (1981). A computer-supported psychological and psychophysiological test-battery for aircraft-pilot selection. In K. Brändli (Ed.), Aviation Psychological Research. Reports of the 14th Conference for Aviation Psychology (pp. 45–70). Bürgenstock, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  14. Heitzlhofer, K. (1978). Der Appetenz-Aversions-Konfliktverlaufbeim Klettern. Eine Typenanalyse. [The approach—avoidance conflict in rock climbing] Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  15. Lackner, E. (1979). Experimentelle Untersuchung über den Einfluß psychischer und motorischer Fähigkeiten auf die Kletterleistung von Anfängern. [An experimental study of the influence of psychological and motor capabilities on the climbing performance of beginners.] Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  16. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Lazarus, R. S. (1977). Cognitive and coping processes in emotion. In A. Monat & R. S. Lazarus (Eds.) Stress and coping: An anthology (pp. 145–159). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Schwarzinger, G. (1980). Konfliktabhängige Situationsbewältigung und-verarbeitung. [Conflict—dependent coping]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  19. Ursin, H., Baade, E. & Levine, S. (Eds.) (1978). Psychobiology of stress: A study of coping men. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Weingarten, P. (1980). Leistungsverhalten jugendlicher Sportler unter Berücksichtigung der Ergopsychometrie. [The performance of young athletes based on ergopsychometry] Research report of the Austrian Ministry of Education, Vienna.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giselher Guttmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychologisches InstitutUniversität WienWienAustria

Personalised recommendations