Advertisement

Discrete Mechanics

  • T. D. Lee
Part of the The Subnuclear Series book series (SUS, volume 21)

Abstract

At present, with QCD for the strong interaction, a unifying gauge theory for the electromagnetic and weak interactions, and the Einstein theory of gravitation (plus possible further unification of some or all of these interactions), we may feel that we have arrived at a closed system of physical laws. Nevertheless, the fact that any of the unifying gauge theoretical models requires about twenty parameters suggests that our understanding of these forces most likely remains phenomenological, far from fundamental. This uneasy feeling is reinforced by the enormous technical difficulty of quantizing gravity.

Keywords

Gauge Theory Wilson Loop Minkowski Space Light Cone Lorentz Transformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. H. Christ R. Friedberg and T. D. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B202, 89, B210, [FS6], 310, 337 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. D. Lee, Phys. Lett. 122B, 217 (1983); CU-TP-266 (to be published in the proceedings of the Shelter Island II Conference).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Friedberg and T. D. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B225 [FS9], 1 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. C. Ren, CU-TP-272 (Nucl. Phys.); R. Friedberg and H. C. Ren, CUTP-268 (Nucl. Phys.).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Itzykson, in Proceedings of the Trieste Workshop, eds. R. Lengo et al. (Singapore, World Scientific, 1983); E. J. Gardner, C. Itzykson and B. Derrida (J. Phys. A); C. Itzykson, “Fields on a Random Lattice,” Saclay DPh. G/SPT/83/148.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. C. Maxwell, in A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (New York, Dover Publications, 1954Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. R. Lundeen and F. M. Pipkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 232 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Feinberg (private communication); L. Bracci, G. Fiorentini, G. Mezzorani and P. Quarati, Phys. Lett. 133B, 231 (1983).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Adeva et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 967 (1982); Proceedings of the 1981 International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies, ed. W. Pfeil (Bonn, Physikalisches Institut, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. A. Fajardo et al, Phys. Rev. D24, 46 (1981)Google Scholar
  11. S. J. Lindenbaum, in Particle and Interaction Physics at High Energies (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas, Nucl. Phys. B206, 321 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    J. M. Ziman, Models of Disonder (New York, Cambridge University Press, 1979)Google Scholar
  14. J. L. Meijering, Philips Research Report 8, 270 (1953).Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D10, 2455 (1974).Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    M. Luscher, Nucl. Phys. B180 [FS2], 1 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    N. H. Christ, R. Friedberg and T. D. Lee (to be published).Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    S. Lindenbaum, this proceeding.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    N. H. Christ and A. E. Terrano, CU-TP-259 (Nuclear Methods and Instrumentation).Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    R. Friedberg, T. D. Lee and H. C. Ren (to be published).Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    T. Regge, Nuovo Cimento 19, 558 (1961). Our treatment is based extensively on Regge’s idea.Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    M. Rocek and R. M. Williams, Phys. Lett. 104B, 3. (1981), in Quantum Structure of Space and Time, eds. M. J. Duff and C. J. Isham (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    G. Feinberg, R. Friedberg, T. D. Lee and H. C. Ren (to be published).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. D. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations