Insects in the Forest Environment

  • Alan A. Berryman
Part of the Population Ecology: Theory and Application book series (POPE)


We have seen that insects are a diverse and highly successful group of organisms that have evolved sophisticated morphological and behavioral adaptations for feeding on all parts of forest trees and for surviving the hazards of their environments. Trees, on the other hand, have not remained passive spectators to these assaults, having evolved equally complex defenses against insect attack. In order to understand the interactions between trees and insects, therefore, we need to spend some time studying the defensive strategies of forest trees.


Stand Density Bark Beetle Negative Feedback Loop Forest Environment Static Defense 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Selected Readings

  1. Baker, F. S., 1950, Principles of Silviculture, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, I. T., and Schultz, J. C., 1983, Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: Evidence for communication between plants, Science 221:277–279. (defense communication)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berryman, A. A., 1972, Resistance of conifers to invasion by bark beetle-fungus associations, BioScience 22:598–602. (induced and static defenses)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berryman, A. A., 1981, Population Systems: A General introduction, Plenum Press, New York. Berryman, A. A., Stenseth, N. C., and Wollkind, D. J., 1984, Metastability of forest ecosystems infested by bark beetles, Res. Pop. Ecol. 26:13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (metastable forest-insect systems) Carter, C. I., and Nichols, J. F. A., 1985, Some resistance features of trees that influence the establishment and development of aphid colonies, Z. Angew. Entomol. 99:64–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowling, E. B., and Horsfall, J. G., 1980, How plants defend themselves, in: Plant DiseaseAn Advanced Treatise, Vol. 5 (J. G. Horsfall and E. B. Cowling, eds.), Academic Press, New York, (general overview of defense against disease)Google Scholar
  7. Feeny, P., 1976, Plant apparency and chemical defense, Recent Adv. Phytochem. 10:1–40. (theory of plant defense)Google Scholar
  8. Furniss, R. L., and Carolin, V. M., 1977, Western forest insects, U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication No. 1339.Google Scholar
  9. Hanover, J. W., 1975, Physiology of tree resistance to insects, Annu. Rev. Entom. 20:75–95. (mainly static defenses)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harper, J. L., 1969, The role of prédation in vegetational diversity, Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 22:48–62. (forest stability)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Haukioja, E., 1980, On the role of plant defenses in the fluctuation of herbivore populations, Oikos 35:202–213. (delayed induced defense and cycles)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kobayashi, F., Yamane, A., and Ikeda, T., 1984, The Japanese pine sawyer beetle as the vector of pine wilt disease, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29:115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuć, J., 1982, Induced immunity to plant disease, BioScience 32:854–860.(immunization)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mattson, W. J., Jr., 1980, Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 11:119–161. (importance of nitrogen)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mattson, W. J., Jr., and Addy, N. D., 1975, Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production, Science 190:515–522. (forest productivity)Google Scholar
  16. Mullick, D. B., 1977, The non-specific nature of defense in bark and wood during wounding, insect and pathogen attack, Recent Adv. Phytochem. 11:395–441 (induced defenses)Google Scholar
  17. Peterman, R. M., 1978, The ecological role of mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests, in: Theory and Practice of Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Lodgepole Pine Forests (A. A. Berryman, G. D. Amman, R. W. Stark, and D. L. Kibbee, eds.), pp. 16–26, Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow, (coadaptation between insects and trees)Google Scholar
  18. Price, P. W., 1975, Insect Ecology, Wiley (Interscience), New York, (community structure and coevolution)Google Scholar
  19. Rhoades, D. F., 1979, Evolution of plant defense against herbivores, pp. 3–54 in: Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites (G. A. Rosenthal and D. H. Jansen, eds.), Academic Press, New York, (plant defenses)Google Scholar
  20. Rhoades, D. F., 1983, Responses of alder and willow to attack by tent caterpillars and webworms: Evidence of pheromonal sensitivity of willows, in: Plant Resistance to Insects. (P. A. Hedlin, ed.), pp. 55–68, ACS Symposium Series No. 208, American Chemical Society, (defense communication)Google Scholar
  21. Rhoades, D. F., 1985, Offensive-defensive interactions between herbivores and plants: Their relevance in herbivore population dynamics and ecological theory, Am. Nat. 125:205–238. (plant defense and herbivore attack strategies)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rhoades, D. F., and Cates, R. G., 1976, Towards a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry, Recent Adv. Phytochem. 10:168–213. (theory of plant defense)Google Scholar
  23. Safranyik, L. (ed.), 1985, The Role of the Host in the Population Dynamics of Forest Insects, Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference, Banff, Alberta, Pacific Forest Research Center, Victoria, B.C.Google Scholar
  24. Schoeneweiss, D. F., 1975, Predispostion, stress, and plant disease, Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 13:193–211. (stress and defense)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schultz, J. C., and Baldwin, I. T., 1982, Oak leaf quality declines in response to defoliation by gypsy moth larvae, Science 217:149–151. (induced defense)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. White, T. C. R., 1978, The importance of a relative shortage of food in animal ecology, Oecologia (Berl.) 33:71–86. (particularly the role of nitrogen)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan A. Berryman
    • 1
  1. 1.Washington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations