Advertisement

Power and Justice in Intergroup Relations

  • Ronald L. Cohen
Part of the Critical Issues in Social Justice book series (CISJ)

Abstract

Why do victims of injustice seem so rarely to challenge, rebel against, or press for systematic change in the factors responsible for their condition? This chapter explores certain aspects of this question, employing a wide variety of evidence from the social psychological literature on justice and revolutionary coalitions. Before proceeding, two potential objections to the perspective taken here must be mentioned.

Keywords

Collective Action Procedural Justice Distributive Justice Political Arena Intergroup Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen, R. L. (1982, June). Distributive justice and power: Preliminary considerations. Paper presented at the Conference on New Directions in Psychological Aspects of Justice, Nags Head, NC.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, R. L. (1985). Procedural justice and participation. Human Relations, 38(7), 643–663.Google Scholar
  3. deCarufel, A., & Schopler, J. (1979). Evaluation of outcome improvement resulting from threats and appeals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 662–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dinnerstein, D. (1977). The mermaid and the minotaur: Sexual arrangements and human malaise. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
  5. Dornbusch, S. M., & Scott, W. R. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Edelman, M. (1977). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253–2261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gamson, W. A., Fireman, B., & Rytina, S. (1982). Encounters with unjust authority. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  10. Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian valley. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, E. (1952). On cooling the mark out. Psychiatry, 15(4), 451–463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hochschild, J. H. (1981). What’s fair? American beliefs about distributive justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 125–143). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kovel, J. (1971). White racism: A psychohistory. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  16. LaTour, S. (1978). Determinants of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1531–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawler, E. J. (1975). An experimental study of factors affecting the mobilization of revolutionary coalitions. Sociometry, 38, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawler, E. J. (1983). Cooptation and threats as “divide and rule” tactics. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawler, E. J., Youngs, G. A., & Lesh, M. (1978). Cooptation and coalition mobilization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,8, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., Jr., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167–218). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Leventhal, G. S., Michaels, J. W., & Sanford, L. (1972). Inequity and interpersonal conflict: Reward allocation and secrecy about reward as methods of preventing conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 88–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lineweber, D., Barr-Bryan, D., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1980). Effects of a legitimate authority’s justification of inequality on the mobilization of revolutionary coalitions. Unpublished manuscript, Laboratory for Social Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  23. Lukes, S. (1975). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Michener, H. A., & Lyons, M. (1972). Perceived support and upward-mobility as determinants of revolutionary coalition behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychlogy, 8, 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mikula, G. (1980). On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 127–166). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Moore, B., Jr. (1978). Injustice: The social bases of obedience and revolt. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  27. Pitkin, H. F. (1981). Justice: On relating private and public. Political Theory, 9(3), 327–352.Google Scholar
  28. Rivera, A. N., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1976). Public versus private reactions to positive inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 895–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ross, M., Thibaut, J., & Evenbeck, S. (1971). Some determinants of the intensity of social protest. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sommer, R. (1982). The district attorney’s dilemma: Experimental games and the real world of plea bargaining. American Psychologist, 37, 526–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review, 18(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice upon satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walker, L., LaTour, S., Lind, E. A., & Thibaut, J. (1974). Reactions of participants and observers to modes of adjudication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 295–310.Google Scholar
  37. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  38. Webster, M., Jr., & Smith, J. E., Jr. (1978). Justice and revolutionary coalitions. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zelditch, M., Jr., Harris, W., Thomas, G. M., & Walker, H. A. (1981). Decisions, nondecisions, and metadecisions (Technical Report No. 78). Stanford, CA: Laboratory for Social Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald L. Cohen
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Science DivisionBennington CollegeBenningtonUSA

Personalised recommendations