Skip to main content

Justice as Fair and Equal Treatment before the Law

The Role of Individual Versus Group Decision Making

  • Chapter
Justice in Social Relations

Part of the book series: Critical Issues in Social Justice ((CISJ))

Abstract

Previous research on the psychology of justice has taught us a great deal about various aspects of justice in interpersonal relationships; it has elaborated the guiding principles of justice considerations for small social units, such as dyads and small groups, and for the system as a whole (Brickman, Folger, Goode, & Schul, 1981). It has been concerned primarily with perceptions of fairness, both of participants and outside observers, in a great variety of conditions under which resources may be distributed (i.e., distributive justice; Homans, 1961). Although most researchers have restricted themselves to the study of positive outcomes, some others have brought the allocation of negative outcomes (e.g., in the form of punishment reactions; Miller & Vidmar, 1981) to our attention (see also Hogan & Emler, 1981, on retributive justice).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle. (1962). The politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter, H., Bleckwenn, M., & Kette, G. (1984). Decision making of industrial tribunals as described by professional and lay judges. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., & Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 173–202). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, J. D. (1978). Having their day in court: Defendant evaluations of the fairness of their treatment. Law and Society Review, 12, 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S. S., & Zeisel, H. (1975). Sentencing councils: A study of sentence disparity and its reduction. University of Chicago Law Review, 43, 109–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, G. A. (1976). Statistical analysis in psychology and education (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, M. E. (1972). Criminal sentences. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans, V. P., & Doob, A. N. (1976). S.12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the deliberations of simulated juries. Criminal Law Quarterly, 18, 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, A. v. (1976). Doing justice. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstätter, P. R. (1971). Gruppendynamik [Group dynamics]. Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 125–143). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, I. A., & Willging, T. E. (1984). The Psychology of law: Integrations and applications. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L., & Bray, R. M. (1982). The Psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm, H., & Myers, D. G. (1978). Group-induced polarization of attitudes and behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 145–195). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBon, G. (1960). The crowd. New York: Viking Compass Edition. (Original work published 1895)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovegrove, A. (1984). An empirical study of sentencing disparity among judges in an Australian criminal court. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & Vidmar, N. (1981). The social psychology of punishment reactions. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 145–170). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G., & Kaplan, M. F. (1976). Group-induced polarization in simulated juries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulos, J. W. (1976). The anatomy of criminal justice. New York: Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, B. D. (1981). The trial process. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M. J. (1977). fury verdicts: The role of group size and social decision rule. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M. J. (1982). Innovation and change in the courtroom. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 325–352). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, M. J., & Hastie, R. (1978). Social psychology in court. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, A. (1977). Studying legal culture: An assessment of survey evidence. Law and Society Review, 11, 427–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöch, H. (1983). Experimente in Strafverfahren und ihre Auswirkungen auf strafrechtliche Sanktionen [Experiments in criminal proceedings and their effects on criminal sanctions]. In H. J. Kerner, H. Kury, & K. Sessar (Eds.), Deutsche Forschungen zur Kriminalitätsentstehung und Kriminalitätskontrolle (Vol. 6, pp. 1083–1108). Köln: Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schünemann, B. (1983). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Reform der Hauptverhandlung in Strafsachen [Experiments on the reform of the trial in penal matters]. In H. J. Kerner, H. Kury, & K. Sessar (Eds.), Deutsche Forschungen zur Kriminalitätsentstehung und Kriminalitätskontrolle (Vol. 6, pp. 1109–1151). Köln: Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R., & Skolnick, J. (1962). A study of legal stigma. Social Problems, 10, 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G., Gilbert, M. A., & Williams, M. C. (1975). Social psychology, criminal justice, and the principle of discretion: A selective review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporer, S. L. (1978). Legal and extra-legal factors in judicial sentencing. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporer, S. L. (1982). Reducing disparity in judicial sentencing: A social-psychological approach. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporer, S. L. (1985). Rechtspsychologie vs. Forensische Psychologie [Legal psychology vs. forensic psychology]. In F. J. Hehl, V. Ebel, W. Ruch (Eds.), Bericht über den Kongress der angewandten Psychologie. Bonn: Deutscher Psychologenverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience. Law and Society Review, 18, 52–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, S. E. (1976). Sentencing councils: A study by simulation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 1819A (University Microfilms No. 76–19, 290).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sporer, S.L. (1986). Justice as Fair and Equal Treatment before the Law. In: Bierhoff, H.W., Cohen, R.L., Greenberg, J. (eds) Justice in Social Relations. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5059-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5059-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5061-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5059-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics