Advertisement

Fertility Rates and Aging

  • Jane Menken
  • Ulla Larsen

Abstract

How much does the capacity to reproduce decline with age? Until quite recently, it was believed that fecundity declined slightly from age 20 to the early thirties, but more sharply after 35. Then a French study (Federation CECOS, 1982) published in February, 1982, reported results from a group of women who had undergone artificial insemination (Table I). Approximately 74% of women who were not over 30 conceived within 12 menstrual cycles. The percentage fell to only 62 for women 31–35, and to 56 for women 36–40. An accompanying editorial and many later newspaper and magazine articles suggested that risks of infertility rose sharply starting as early as age 30. The purpose of this chapter is to review evidence of the level and age pattern of decline in fecundity for women and for men and then to focus on delayed childbearing.

Keywords

Married Woman Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Artificial Insemination Marital Fertility Marital Duration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bongaarts, J., 1982, Infertility after age 30: A false alarm, Fam. Plann. Perspect. 14(2):75–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coale, A., and Trussell, J., 1974, Model fertility schedules: Variation in the age structure of childbearing in human populations, Popul. Index 40:185–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins, J. A., Wrixon, W., Janes, L. B., and Wilson, E. H., 1983, Treatment-independent pregnancy among infertile couples, New Engl. J. Med. 309:1201–1206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Curran, J. W., 1980, Economic consequences of pelvic inflammatory disease in the United States, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 138 (7, Part 2): 848–851.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eighth Census of Canada, 1946, Vol. 3, Ages of the population, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  6. Federation CECOS, Schwartz, D., and Mayaux, H. J., 1982, Female fecundity as a function of age, New Engl. J. Med. 307:404–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flinn, M., 1981, The European Demographic System, 1500–1820, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  8. Hajnal, J., 1965, European marriage patterns in perspective, in: Population in History (D.V. Glass and D.E.C. Eversley, eds.), Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  9. Hendershot, G. E., Mosher, W. D., and Pratt, W. F., 1982, Infertiltiy and age: An unresolved issue, Fam. Plann. Perspect. 14(5):287–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henry, L., 1961, Some data on natural fertility, Eugenics Q. 8:81–91.Google Scholar
  11. Heuser, R. L., 1976, Fertility tables for birth cohorts by color, DHEW publication No. (HRA) 76-1152, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Hogue, C. J. R., Cates, W., and Tietze, C., 1982, The effects of induced abortion on subsequent reproduction, Epidemiol. Rev. 4:66–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hogue, C. J. R., Cates, W. and Tietze, C., 1983, Impact of vacuum aspiration abortion on future childbearing: A review, Fam. Plann. Perspect. 15:119–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [Ireland], Great Britain Parliament House of Commons, 1913, Parliamentary papers, accounts and papers, Vol. 118, 1912-1913. “Census of Ireland, 1911. General report, with tables and appendix.” H.M. Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
  15. McFalls, J., 1979, Frustrated Fertility: A Population Paradox, Popul. Bull. 34, No. 2.Google Scholar
  16. Menken, J., and Larsen, U., 1984, Age and fertility: How late can you wait? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America; 1984 May, 3-5; Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  17. Mineau, G., and J. Trussell, 1982, A specification of marital fertility by parents’ age, age at marriage, and marital duration, Demography 19(3):335–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosher, W. D., 1982, Infertility trends among U.S. couples: 1965–1976, Fam. Plann. Perspect. 14(1):22–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mosher, W. D., and Pratt, W. F., 1982, Reproductive impairments among married couples, United States, Vital and Health Statistics. Series 23, No. 11. National Center for Health Statistics. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar
  20. National Center for Health Statistics, December, 1983a, Advance report of final natality statistics, 1981, Monthly Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 32, No. 9.Google Scholar
  21. National Center for Health Statistics, 1983b, Unpublished data.Google Scholar
  22. Page, H., 1977, Patterns underlying fertility schedules: A decomposition by both age and marriage duration, Popul. Stud. 31:85–106.Google Scholar
  23. [Scotland], Great Britain, Parliament House of Commons, 1914, Parliamentary papers, accounts and papers, Vol. 44, 1914. Census of Scotland, 1911. Report on the Twelfth Decennial Census of Scotland. H.M. Stationery Office: London.Google Scholar
  24. Senanayake, P., and Kramer, D. G., 1980, Contraception and the etiology of pelvic inflammatory disease: New perspectives, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 138(7, Part 2):852–860.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Trussell, J., and Wilson, C., 1985, Sterility in a population with natural fertility, Popul. Stud. 39: 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tukey, J. W., 1977, Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading.Google Scholar
  27. Ventura, S., 1982, Trends in first births to older mothers, 1970-79, National Center for Health Statistics, Monthly Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 31, No. 2 Supp. (2).Google Scholar
  28. Vessey, M. P., Wright, N. H., McPherson, K. and Wiggens, P., 1978, Fertility after stopping different methods of contraception, Br. Med. J. 1(4 Feb.):265–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1976, Vol. 1, Natality, Hyattsville, Maryland, NCHS, 1980.Google Scholar
  30. Weström, L., 1980, Incidence, prevalence and trends of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in industrialized countries. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 138(7, Part 2):880–892.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane Menken
    • 1
  • Ulla Larsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Population ResearchPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations