Advertisement

Conformational Change of DNA in Specific Recognition Complexes between DNA and Protein

  • Rosalind Kim
  • Sung-Hou Kim
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 98)

Abstract

Specific recognition between protein and DNA is one of the most fundamental interactions in the cell. Many experiments suggest that in such recognition systems, a protein binds to DNA “non-specifically” first, then searches for the cognate DNA sequence by sliding, short hopping and/or inter-strand jumping. When it finds the target site, it may “passively” stop, or “interactively” binds to DNA, resulting in conformational changes of DNA and/or protein in forming the complex. Our study with two “specific recognition” systems shows that DNA in the specific complexes is bent and/or unwound, but no measurable DNA distortion is revealed in non-specific interaction.

The small magnitude of the DNA distortion suggests a mechanism of the active recognition, whereby a population of thermally fluctuating DNA structures (compatible to formation of a specific recognition complex) is “captured”, thus freezing the distorted DNA structure in the complex, rather than the protein twisting DNA into a structure normally absent in a free state. This mechanism also provides an explanation for the effect of the flanking sequence around the recognition site on DNA because the flexibility of DNA is likely to be a function of the DNA sequence on and around the recognized sequence.

Keywords

Active Recognition Specific Recognition EcoRI Site EcoRI Restriction EcoRI Restriction Enzyme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Modrich, Studies on sequence recognition by type II restriction and modification enzymes, CRC Critical Reviews in Biochemistry 13:287 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Bourgeois and M. Pfahl, Repressors, Adv. Protein Chem. 30:1 (1976).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. G. Berg, R. B. Winter, and P. H. von Hippel, Biochemistry 20:6929 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. L. Bresloff and D. M. Crothers, DNA-ethidium reaction kinetics: Demonstration of direct ligand transfer between DNA binding sites, J. Mol. Biol. 95:103 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. H. von Hippel, A. Revzin, C. A. Gross, and A. C. Wang, Protein-ligand interactions, in: “Protein-ligand Interactions”, H. Sund and G. Blauer, eds., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Keller and I. Wendell, Stepwise relaxation of supercoiled SV40 DNA, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 39:199 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Bauer, F. H. C. Crick, and H. White, Supercoiled DNA, Scientific American 118 (1980).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. C. Wang, L. J. Peck, and K. Becherer, DNA supercoiling and its effects on DNA structure and function, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 47:85 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. R. Sadler, M. Tecklenburg, and L. L. Betz, Plasmids containing many tandem copies of a synthetic lactose operator, Gene 8:279 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Kim and S.-H. Kim, Direct measurement of DNA unwinding angle in specific interaction between lac operator and repressor, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 47:451 (1983).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. C. Wang, M. D. Barkely, and S. Bourgeois, Measurements of unwinding of lac operator by repressor, Nature 251:247 (1974).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Gierer, Model for DNA and protein interactions and the function of the operator, Nature 212:1480 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. M. Sobell, Molecular mechanism for genetic recombination, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69:2483 (1972).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. I. Lim and A. L. Mazanov, Tertiary structure for palindromic regions of DNA, FEBS Lett. 88:118 (1978).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Stasiak and T. Klopotowski, Four-stranded DNA structure and DNA base methylation in the mechanism of action of restriction endonucleases, J. Theor. Biol. 80:65 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. B. Clewell, Nature of ColE: Plasmid replication in Escherichia coli in the presence of chloramphenicol, J. Bacteriol. 110:667 (1972).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Modrich and D. Zabel, EcoRI endonuclease: Physical and catalytic properties of the homogeneous enzyme, J. Biol. Chem. 251:5866 (1976).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Fried and D. Crothers, Equilibria and kinetics of the repressor-operator interactions by Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Nucl. Acids Res. 9:6505 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. F. Pulleyblank, M. Shure, D. Tang, J. Vinograd, and H.-P. Vosberg, Action of nicking-closing enzyme on supercoiled and nonsupercoiled closed circular DNA: Formation of a Boltzmann distribution of topological isomers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:4280 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Depew and J. C. Wang, Conformational fluctuations of DNA helix, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:4275 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. R. Drew, S. Samson, and R. E. Dickerson, Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer at 16 K°, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:4040 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. R. Holbrook and S.-H. Kim, The local mobility of nucleic acids as determined from crystallographic data. I. RNA and B-form DNA, J. Mol. Biol. 173:361 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosalind Kim
    • 2
  • Sung-Hou Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Melvin Calvin LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations