Influence of Training Strength on Long-Term Retention of a Conditioned Saccharin Aversion in Rats

  • G. Schmaltz
  • P. Marcant
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 28)


The retention of a conditioned taste aversion was tested under two training strengths, over a 14-day period. On training day, water was replaced by a 0.1 % saccharin solution (novel taste). Thirty minutes later, the rats received an i.p. injection of saline or were poisoned with LiCl (110 mg/kg). Fourteen independent groups (7 saline and 7 LiCl groups) were tested for retention either 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10 or 14 days following training. On retention day, each rat was submitted to a two-bottle choice procedure (saccharin vs water). Preference for saccharin was evaluated through the following ratio: 100 × (saccharin intake/total intake). When 30 minutes elapsed between saccharin (CS) and LiCl (US), the animals developed a significant aversion thereafter (p at least < 0.05): the grand mean saccharin preference index was 5.3 % within the LiCl groups and 64,4 % within the saline groups. No significant fluctuations in the magnitude of aversion appeared between different retention intervals. A previous work (Biederman et al., 1974) showed that memory of a conditioned saccharin aversion followed a U-shaped function. However, the authors used a one-bottle procedure which does not seem to be the most appropriate to investigate the memory of aversion. In a second experiment, our general procedure was employed except that a 3-hour CS-US delay was used in order to decrease the strength of training.


Retention Interval Training Strength Saline Group Preference Score Significant Fluctuation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Biederman, G.B., Milgram, N.W., Heighington, G.A., Stockman, S.M., and O’Neill, W., 1974, Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 26: 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Logue, A.W., 1979, Psychol. Bull., 86: 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Schmaltz
    • 1
  • P. Marcant
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de PsychophysiologieUniversité de Lille IVilleneuve d’Ascq cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations